Publications (2)9.55 Total impact
-
Article: Impact of responder definition on the enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trial design for establishing proof of concept in neuropathic pain.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to evaluate how enrichment for responders increases assay sensitivity in an enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal (EERW) proof-of-concept (POC) study in neuropathic pain. Adults with moderate to severe peripheral neuropathic pain entered a 3- to 4-day screening period, followed by a 12-day titration to the highest tolerated dose that provided pain control (pregabalin 50-200mg t.i.d.), and then a 9-day maintenance period. Subjects were stratified as primary responders (⩾30%), secondary responders (⩾10% to <30%), or nonresponders (<10%) based on decrease in pain intensity and were randomized to placebo or pregabalin during the randomized withdrawal period. The primary endpoint was mean of average 24-h pain intensity during the last 3days of treatment period relative to the 3days before randomization. Time-to-efficacy-failure was the key secondary endpoint. Other features included not requiring discontinuation of current analgesic therapies and blinding investigators to study design elements that could contribute to non-treatment-related responses. Effect size (ES) (mean treatment difference/SD) was used to measure assay sensitivity. Pregabalin-treated subjects (n=52) had significantly less pain than those receiving placebo (n=51) (P⩽.003). Effect size of the primary endpoint was 0.72 for primary responders and decreased if secondary and nonresponders were included in the analysis. The highest ES (1.68) was demonstrated for the endpoint time-to-efficacy-failure seen in primary responders with painful diabetic neuropathy. The EERW trial design using time-to-efficacy-failure may provide a sensitive and efficient method to conduct POC studies of novel therapies in patients with neuropathic pain. Enriching a study population with patients who have achieved a 30% decrease in pain with an investigational therapy, and using time-to-efficacy-failure during the randomized withdrawal phase as the primary endpoint, can be used for a proof-of-concept study to optimize assay sensitivity and efficiently determine the analgesic potential of a new treatment for neuropathic pain.Pain 03/2011; 152(3):514-21. · 5.78 Impact Factor -
Article: Effect of morphine and pregabalin compared with diphenhydramine hydrochloride and placebo on hyperalgesia and allodynia induced by intradermal capsaicin in healthy male subjects.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Intradermal (ID) capsaicin injection in humans induces spontaneous pain, flare, primary hyperalgesia, secondary hyperalgesia, and allodynia. Secondary hyperalgesia and allodynia are a reflection of central sensitization. The effect of treatment of single doses of (1) pregabalin, 300 mg single oral dose, and (2) morphine, 10 mg IV, on the area of secondary hyperalgesia induced by ID capsaicin injection was studied by using a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, 4-period, cross-over design in 20 healthy men. Compared with active placebo diphenhydramine (50 mg oral dose), pregabalin and morphine significantly reduced the area of secondary hyperalgesia over 15 to 240 minutes after capsaicin injection (approximately 25%, P = .002 and approximately 33%, P < .001, respectively). A smaller reduction was observed when pregabalin and morphine were compared with true placebo (approximately 13%, P = .081 and approximately 24%, P = .009, respectively). Diphenhydramine, on the other hand, increased the area of secondary hyperalgesia in comparison with true placebo (approximately 16%, P = .061). The relationship between the baseline area of hyperalgesia and assay sensitivity suggests that establishing minimum entry criteria for the baseline area of hyperalgesia requirement increases the sensitivity of the assay. PERSPECTIVE: These results suggest that the minimally invasive intradermal capsaicin model, when it is compared with true placebo, can potentially be used for an early assessment of relevant pharmacology of novel analgesic compounds in healthy subjects. This platform may provide a means to rapidly assess new analgesics and enhance dose selection and decision-making during clinical development.The journal of pain: official journal of the American Pain Society 01/2009; 9(12):1088-95. · 3.78 Impact Factor
