Publications (2)5.8 Total impact
-
Article: Managing non-paraneoplastic Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome: clinical characteristics in 25 German patients.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In about 40% of patients LEMS is not a paraneoplastic phenomenon (NT-LEMS). Several clinical aspects important to these patients remain open, especially the question when a LEMS can definitely be diagnosed as NT-LEMS. Here we describe a series of 25 German NT-LEMS patients regarding their clinical characteristics, duration of symptoms, value of serological markers, paraneoplastic antibodies and FDG-PET/CT. Furthermore, we discuss the current diagnostic criteria of NT-LEMS.Journal of neuroimmunology 10/2009; 217(1-2):90-4. · 2.84 Impact Factor -
Article: Lambert-eaton myasthenic syndrome differential reactivity of tumor versus non-tumor patients to subunits of the voltage-gated calcium channel.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) is an autoimmune disease in which the transmission across the neuromuscular junction is disturbed by autoantibodies directed against the presynaptic P/Q-type voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC). LEMS is paraneoplastic (T-LEMS) in about 60% of patients mostly associated with a small cellular lung carcinoma (SCLC), but occurs spontaneously without a tumor in 40% (NT-LEMS). In most cases neurologic symptoms appear before tumor diagnosis, but there is as yet no clear specific serologic marker to distinguish between NT- and T-LEMS. To see whether antibodies from patients with NT- and T-LEMS differentially recognize antigenic sites of the alpha 1A subunit of P/Q-type VGCC, we studied serum samples from 22 T-LEMS and 24 NT-LEMS patients. Sera reactivity was tested by Western blot analysis to recombinant proteins corresponding to the extracellular S5-S6 linker region of three out of four domains forming the alpha 1 subunit of P/Q-type VGCC. Sera from 9/24 (37,5%) NT-LEMS patients, but only 1/22 (4,6%) T-LEMS patients recognized domain IV (p=0,011). Seroreactivity to domains I and III was similar for NT-LEMS and T-LEMS patients (domain I: 8%/14%; domain III: 46%/41%, not significant). These data suggest that an antibody response to domain IV is more common in LEMS without tumor than in paraneoplastic LEMS. This may have implications for diagnostic workup in LEMS patients without previously established diagnosis of a tumor. Additionally this could point towards a differential autoimmune pathogenesis between T-LEMS and NT-LEMS.Journal of Neuroimmunology 10/2008; 204(1-2):136-9. · 2.96 Impact Factor
