-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Computed tomography (CT) is the standard to screen blunt trauma patients for cervical spine (c-spine) fractures, yet there remains a reluctance to scan all trauma team activations because of radiation exposure and cost. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of positive CT in an effort to decrease future CT use without compromising patient care.
We performed a prospective study in which we documented 18 combined NEXUS and Canadian c-spine criteria on 5,182 patients before CT comparing those with and without fractures to identify predictors of injury. Clinical examination was considered positive if any of the 18 criteria were positive.
There were 324 patients with a fracture, for an incidence rate of 6.25%. Fracture patients were older (43.89 ± 18.83 years vs. 38.42 ± 17.45 years, p <; 0.0001), with a lower GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale) score (13.49 ± 3.49 vs. 14.32 ± 2.34, p < 0.0001), than nonfracture patients. Clinical examination had a 100% (324 of 324) sensitivity, 0.62% (30 of 4,858) specificity, 6.29% (324 of 5,152) positive predictive value, and 100% (30 of 30) negative predictive value. A total of 77.8% (14 of 18) criteria were significantly associated with fracture by univariate analysis, seven of which were independent predictors of fracture by logistic regression (midline tenderness, GCS score < 15, age ≥65 years, paresthesias, rollover motor vehicle collision, ejected, never in sitting position in emergency department). Evaluation of these seven factors demonstrated a sensitivity of 99.07% (321 of 324), positive predictive value of 6.95% (321 of 4,617), specificity of 11.57% (562 of 4,858), and negative predictive value of 99.47% (562 of 565).
Although sensitive, the standard clinical criteria used to determine patients who need radiographs lack specificity. Based on these results, more narrow criteria should be validated in an effort to limit the number of c-spine CTs while not compromising patient care.
Prognostic study, level II; diagnostic study, level II.
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 04/2013; 74(2):1098-101.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this trial was to determine if using a closed technique for bladder pressure measurements (BPMs) would eliminate them as a risk factor for urinary tract infection (UTI) in trauma patients, as was shown previously using an open technique.
Data were collected prospectively from January 2006 until December 2009 by a dedicated epidemiology nurse and combined with trauma registry data at our Level 1 trauma center. All trauma patients admitted to the surgical trauma intensive care unit (STICU) with and without UTIs were compared for demographic and epidemiologic data. A closed system was used in which the urinary drainage catheter (UDC) remained connected to the bag and 45 mL of saline was injected through a two-way valved sideport, with subsequent measurements through the sideport.
There were 1,641 patients in the trial. The UTI group was sicker (Injury Severity Score [ISS] 18.7±11.9 no UTI vs. 28±10.7 UTI; p<0.0001), with longer stays (11.4±12.4 days no UTI vs. 37.9±20.3 days UTI; p<0.0001) and more UDC days (4.3±6.6 no UTI vs. 23.9±16.6 UTI; p<0.0001). The BPM group had more UDC days (15.6 days±16.0 BPM vs. 5.4 days±7.3 no BPM; p<0.0001), yet no difference in UTI rate/1,000 UDC days (5.7 no BPM vs. 8.0 BPM; p=0.5291). Logistic regression demonstrated only UDC days to be a predictor of UTI (1.125; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.097-1.154; p<0.0001), whereas ISS (1.083, 95% CI 1.063-1.104; p<0.0001) and age (1.051, 95% CI 1.037-1.065; p<0.0001) were the only predictors of death.
Although patients undergoing BPM have more UTIs than patients without BPM, the measurements are not an independent predictor of UTI when done by the closed technique. These findings emphasize the judicious use of BPM with a closed system and, more importantly, the need for early removal of catheters.
Surgical Infections 02/2012; 13(2):85-7. · 1.80 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The Canadian cervical spine rule (CCS) has been found to be an effective tool to determine the need for radiographic evaluation of the cervical spine (c-spine) incorporating both clinical findings and mechanism. Previously, it has been validated only through clinical follow-up or selective use of X-rays. The purpose of this study was to validate it using computed tomography (CT) as the gold standard to identify fractures.
Prospective evaluation was performed on 3,201 blunt trauma patients who were screened by CCS and were compared with a complete c-spine CT. CSS positive indicated at least one positive clinical or mechanism finding, whereas CT positive indicated presence of a fracture.
There were 192 patients with c-spine fractures versus 3,009 without fracture on CT. The fracture group was older (42.7 ± 19.0 years vs. 37.8 ± 17.5 years, p = 0.0006), had a lower Glasgow Coma Scale score (13.8 ± 4.2 vs. 14.4 ± 4.3, p < 0.0001), and lower systolic blood pressure (133.3 ± 23.8 mm Hg vs. 139.5 ± 23.1 mm Hg, p = 0.0023). The sensitivity of CCS was 100% (192/192), specificity was 0.60% (18/3009), positive predictive value was 6.03% (192/3183), and negative predictive value was 100% (18/18). Logistic regression identified only 8 of the 19 factors included in the CCS to be independent predictors of c-spine fracture.
CCS is very sensitive but not very specific to determine the need for radiographic evaluation after blunt trauma. Based on this study, the rule should be streamlined to improve specificity while maintaining sensitivity.
The Journal of trauma 08/2011; 71(2):352-5; discussion 355-7. · 2.48 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study evaluated a program designed to test and enhance residents' knowledge of geriatrics. A 2-year prospective interventional trial was conducted. Surgical residents underwent pretesting (pre) in three areas: polypharmacy, delirium, and end of life. They then received educational materials and completed a posttest within 1 month and a patient simulation examination graded by a physician observer and the patient on his or her satisfaction. Forty-nine residents (51% interns, 55% general surgery residents) participated. Seventy per cent had no prior geriatrics education. Test scores significantly improved from pretest to posttest (12.9 ± 3.1 vs 13.78 ± 3.12, P = 0.01). The scores were consistently better on poly topics and consistently worse on end-of-life topics: pretest per cent correct: polypharmacy 60, end of life 46, P = 0.007; posttest percent correct: polypharmacy 63, end of life 49, P = 0.0014. By Pearson correlation, the pretest and posttest scores did not correlate with either the observer (R = -0.16, P = 0.27 pre, R = -0.08, P = 0.59 post) or subscores (R = -0.27, P = 0.11 pre, R = -0.13, P = 0.45 post), although the observer and subscore correlated with each other (R = 0.35, P = 0.036). Performance was poor and did not correlate with better patient care by simulation. Other options for geriatric education need to be considered and evaluated.
The American surgeon 07/2011; 77(7):826-31. · 1.28 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: EAST guidelines now recommend computed tomography (CT) to evaluate cervical spine (c-spine) fractures after blunt trauma in patients who do not meet National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study criteria (NC), yet no imaging is required in those patients who do meet these criteria. NC are based on patients with both minor and severe (trauma team activation [TTA]) trauma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the NC using CT as the gold standard in TTA patients.
We prospectively evaluated 2,606 blunt TTA patients at our Level I trauma center. NC defined as alertness (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score = 15), evidence of intoxication, clinically distracting injury, midline c-spine tenderness, or neurologic deficits were documented. CT was used to determine the accuracy of these criteria.
There were 157 patients with c-spine fractures and 2,449 patients without c-spine fractures. The fracture group was older (age, 43.4 years ± 19.3 years fracture group vs. 37.7 years ± 17.5 years no fracture group, p = 0.0003) with a lower GCS score (fracture group 13.7 ± 4.5 vs. no fracture group 14.4 ± 3.6, p = 0.0001) and initial systolic blood pressure (132.5 mm Hg ± 23.4 mm Hg vs. 139.9 mm Hg vs. 23.5 mm Hg, p = 0.0009). The sensitivity and specificity of clinical examination for all patients were 82.8% (130 of 157) and 45.7% (1,118 of 2,449), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 8.9% (130 of 1,461) and 97.6% (1,118 of 1,145), respectively. Patients with a GCS score of 15 had a sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 52.3%, PPV of 8.5%, and NPV of 97.5% for clinical examination. In those patients with the GCS score of 15, no intoxication or distracting injury, clinical examination had a sensitivity of 59.4%, specificity of 79.5%, PPV of 12.5%, and NPV of 97.5%. Of 26 patients with missed injuries based on NC, 19 (73.1%) required further intervention (16 collars, 2 OR, 1 Halo).
As in our previous trial, NC is inaccurate compared with CT to diagnose c-spine fractures in TTA patients. CT should be used in all blunt TTA patients regardless of whether they meet NC.
The Journal of trauma 04/2011; 70(4):829-31. · 2.48 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We hypothesized that flexion extension (FE) films do not facilitate the diagnosis or treatment of ligamentous injury of the cervical spine after blunt trauma. From January 2000 to December 2008 we reviewed all patients who underwent FE films and compared five-view plain films (5 view) and cervical spine CTC with FE in the diagnosis of ligamentous injury. There were 22,929 patients with blunt trauma and of these, 271 patients underwent 303 FE films. Average age was 39.6 years, Injury Severity Score was 10.8, Glasgow Coma Score was 14.1, lactate was 2.6 mmol/L, and hospital length of stay was 6 days. Compared with FE, 5 view and CTC had a sensitivity of 80 per cent (8 of 10), positive predictive value of 47.1 per cent (8 of 17), specificity of 96.55 per cent (252 of 261), and negative predictive value of 99.21 per cent (252 of 254). For purposes of analysis, incomplete and ambiguous FE films were listed as negative; however, 20.5 per cent (62 of 303) were incomplete and 9.2 per cent (28 of 303) were ambiguous. Management did not change for the 2 patients with missed ligament injuries. The 303 studies cost $162,105.00 to obtain. FEs are often incomplete and unreliable making it difficult to use them to base management decisions. They do not facilitate treatment and may lead to increased cost and prolonged cervical collars.
The American surgeon 12/2010; 76(12):1351-4. · 1.28 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to compare flexion-extension (FE) plain films with MRI as the gold standard in the diagnosis of ligamentous injury (LI) of the cervical spine after trauma. A retrospective review of patients sustaining blunt trauma from January 2000 to December 2008 (n = 22929) who had both FE and MRI of the cervical spine was performed. Two hundred seventy-one patients had 303 FE films. Forty-nine also had MRI. The average Injury Severity Score was 15.6 +/- 10.2, Glasgow Coma Scale was 13.8 +/- 3.5, lactate 2.2 +/- 1.7 mmol/L, and hospital stay of 8 +/- 11.2 days. FE failed to identify all eight LIs seen on MRI. FE film sensitivity was 0 per cent (zero of eight), specificity 98 per cent (40 of 41), positive predictive value 0 per cent (zero of one), and negative predictive value 83 per cent (40 of 48). Although classified as negative for purposes of analysis, FE was incomplete 20.5 per cent (62 of 303) and ambiguous 9.2 per cent (28 of 303) of the time. The charge of FE is $535 so $48150 (90 incomplete/ambiguous films) could have been saved by eliminating these films. FE should no longer be used to diagnose LI. Given the rare incidence of these injuries, MRI should be used when there is high clinical suspicion of injury.
The American surgeon 06/2010; 76(6):595-8. · 1.28 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to determine if anemia in isolated head trauma patients results in a higher mortality rate that would justify a more liberal use of blood transfusions.
A retrospective review of isolated blunt head trauma patients was performed between January 2001 and December 2006. Comparisons were made between survivors and nonsurvivors regarding demographics, laboratory values, transfusions received, and lengths of stay.
There were 788 patients with 735 survivors who were significantly younger (46.3 y +/- 21.5 survivors versus 68.9 y +/- 18.8 nonsurvivors, P < 0.0001) and less injured [(ISS: 14.7 +/- 5.2 survivors versus 23.2 +/- 4.7 nonsurvivors, P < 0.0001), (head abbreviated injury severity: 3.7 +/- 0.7 survivors versus 4.7 +/- 0.5 nonsurvivors, P < 0.0001)] than those who died (n = 53). The survivors also had shorter lengths of stay (days) [(ICU: 2.4 +/- 4.2 versus 5.6 +/- 11.7, P = 0.03), (hospital: 6.3 +/- 9.8 versus 7.8 +/- 14.8, P = 0.02)]. Multivariate logistic regression showed age (OR 1.063, CI 1.042-1.084), ISS (OR 1.376, CI 1.270-1.491), minimum hemoglobin (OR 0.855, CI 0.732-1.000), and total blood products transfused (OR 1.073, CI 1.008-1.142) to be independent predictors of mortality with an ROC of 0.942. Outcome was independent of the operative procedures, hematocrit and packed red blood cells transfused at 24, 48, and 72 h. Hemoglobin levels of <8 mg/dL were more predictive of death than >8 mg/dL (P = 0.01).
This study supports the need to balance mild anemia with judicious blood product use in the head trauma patient. Given the risk with blood product use, each transfusion should be carefully considered and the patient re-evaluated regularly to determine the need for further intervention.
Journal of Surgical Research 06/2008; 147(2):163-7. · 2.25 Impact Factor
