Yun Yang

Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Sheng, China

Are you Yun Yang?

Claim your profile

Publications (7)49.9 Total impact

  • Article: An RNA architectural locus control region involved in Dscam mutually exclusive splicing.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The most striking example of alternative splicing in a Drosophila melanogaster gene is observed in the Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule, which can generate 38,016 different isoforms. RNA secondary structures are thought to direct the mutually exclusive splicing of Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we describe a locus control region that can activate the exon 6 cluster and specifically allow for the selection of only one exon variant in combination with docking site selector sequence interactions. Combining comparative genomic studies of 63 species with mutational analysis reveals that intricate, tandem multi-'subunit' RNA structures within the locus control region activate species-appropriate alternative variants. Importantly, strengthening the weak splice sites of the target exon can remove the locus control region dependence. Our findings not only provide a locus control region-dependent mechanism for mutually exclusive splicing, but also suggest a model for the evolution of increased complexity in a long-range RNA molecular machine.
    Nature Communications 12/2012; 3:1255. · 7.40 Impact Factor
  • Article: Conservation and regulation of alternative splicing by dynamic inter- and intra-intron base pairings in Lepidoptera 14-3-3z pre-mRNAs.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Alternative splicing of pre-mRNAs greatly contributes to diversity in products generated from a single gene. However, the underlying regulatory mechanisms are poorly understood. In the present study, we describe evolutionarily conserved intra-intronic and inter-intronic RNA secondary structures. Mutation experiments revealed that intra-intronic RNA secondary structure causes steric hindrance to enforce mutual splicing exclusivity, while inter-intronic RNA pairing largely functions through a looped-out mechanism. Moreover, mutually exclusive splicing may be regulated by RNA pairing competition between intra- and inter-introns. Importantly, the resulting dynamic RNA architecture largely controls mutually exclusive splicing, although cis-acting regulatory sequences may fine-tune this process. Our results emphasize the importance of dynamic RNA architecture in alternative splicing.
    RNA biology 05/2012; 9(5):691-700. · 5.56 Impact Factor
  • Article: New insights into RNA secondary structure in the alternative splicing of pre-mRNAs.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Alternative splicing is an important mechanism in generating proteomic diversity, and RNA secondary structure is an important element in splicing regulation. The use of high-throughput sequencing and other approaches has increased the number of known pre-mRNA secondary structures by several orders of magnitude, and we now have new insights into the role of RNA secondary structure in alternative splicing and the mechanisms involved (e.g., physical competition, long-range RNA pairing, the structural splicing code, and co-transcriptional splicing). Furthermore, an RNA pairing-based mechanism ensures the selection of only one of several available exons (e.g., Dscam splicing). Here we review several recent discoveries related to the role of RNA secondary structure in alternative splicing and the underlying mechanisms.
    RNA biology 05/2011; 8(3):450-7. · 5.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: A structural determinant required for RNA editing.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RNA editing by adenosine deaminases acting on RNAs (ADARs) can be both specific and non-specific, depending on the substrate. Specific editing of particular adenosines may depend on the overall sequence and structural context. However, the detailed mechanisms underlying these preferences are not fully understood. Here, we show that duplex structures mimicking an editing site in the Gabra3 pre-mRNA unexpectedly fail to support RNA editing at the Gabra3 I/M site, although phylogenetic analysis suggest an evolutionarily conserved duplex structure essential for efficient RNA editing. These unusual results led us to revisit the structural requirement for this editing by mutagenesis analysis. In vivo nuclear injection experiments of mutated editing substrates demonstrate that a non-conserved structure is a determinant for editing. This structure contains bulges either on the same or the strand opposing the edited adenosine. The position of these bulges and the distance to the edited base regulate editing. Moreover, elevated folding temperature can lead to a switch in RNA editing suggesting an RNA structural change. Our results indicate the importance of RNA tertiary structure in determining RNA editing.
    Nucleic Acids Research 03/2011; 39(13):5669-81. · 8.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: RNA secondary structure in mutually exclusive splicing.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mutually exclusive splicing is a regulated means to generate protein diversity, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Here comparative genome analysis revealed the built-in intronic elements for controlling mutually exclusive splicing of the 14-3-3ΞΎ pre-mRNA. These elements are clade specific but are evolutionarily conserved at the secondary structure level. Combined evidence revealed the triple functions of these inter-intronic RNA pairings in synergistically ensuring the selection of only one of multiple exons, through activation of the proximal variable exon outside the loop by the approximation of cis elements, and simultaneous repression of the exon within the loop, in combination with the physical competition of RNA pairing. Additionally, under this model, we also deciphered a similar structural code in exon clusters 4 and 9 of Dscam (38,016 isoforms) and Mhc (480 isoforms). Our findings suggest a broadly applicable mechanism to ensure mutually exclusive splicing.
    Nature Structural &#38 Molecular Biology 02/2011; 18(2):159-68. · 12.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Molecular determinants and evolutionary dynamics of wobble splicing.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Alternative splicing at tandem splice sites (wobble splicing) is widespread in many species, but the mechanisms specifying the tandem sites remain poorly understood. Here, we used synaptotagmin I as a model to analyze the phylogeny of wobble splicing spanning more than 300 My of insect evolution. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the occurrence of species-specific wobble splicing was related to synonymous variation at tandem splice sites. Further mutagenesis experiments demonstrated that wobble splicing could be lost by artificially induced synonymous point mutations due to destruction of splice acceptor sites. In contrast, wobble splicing could not be correctly restored through mimicking an ancestral tandem acceptor by artificial synonymous mutation in in vivo splicing assays, which suggests that artificial tandem splice sites might be incompatible with normal wobble splicing. Moreover, combining comparative genomics with hybrid minigene analysis revealed that alternative splicing has evolved from the 3' tandem donor to the 5' tandem acceptor in Culex pipiens, as a result of an evolutionary shift of cis element sequences from 3' to 5' splice sites. These data collectively suggest that the selection of tandem splice sites might not simply be an accident of history but rather in large part the result of coevolution between splice site and cis element sequences as a basis for wobble splicing. An evolutionary model of wobble splicing is proposed.
    Molecular Biology and Evolution 03/2009; 26(5):1081-92. · 5.55 Impact Factor
  • Article: A-to-I RNA editing alters less-conserved residues of highly conserved coding regions: implications for dual functions in evolution.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The molecular mechanism and physiological function of recoding by A-to-I RNA editing is well known, but its evolutionary significance remains a mystery. We analyzed the RNA editing of the Kv2 K(+) channel from different insects spanning more than 300 million years of evolution: Drosophila melanogaster, Culex pipiens (Diptera), Pulex irritans (Siphonaptera), Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera), Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera), Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera), Pediculus humanus (Phthiraptera), and Myzus persicae (Homoptera). RNA editing was detected across all Kv2 orthologs, representing the most highly conserved RNA editing event yet reported in invertebrates. Surprisingly, five of these editing sites were conserved in squid (Mollusca) and were possibly of independent origin, suggesting phylogenetic conservation of editing between mollusks and insects. Based on this result, we predicted and experimentally verified two novel A-to-I editing sites in squid synaptotagmin I transcript. In addition, comparative analysis indicated that RNA editing usually occurred within highly conserved coding regions, but mostly altered less-conserved coding positions of these regions. Moreover, more than half of these edited amino acids are genomically encoded in the orthologs of other species; an example of a conversion model of the nonconservative edited site is addressed. Therefore, these data imply that RNA editing might play dual roles in evolution by extending protein diversity and maintaining phylogenetic conservation.
    RNA 07/2008; 14(8):1516-25. · 5.09 Impact Factor