Publications (4)2.15 Total impact
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Excision of cutaneous lesions in the lower limb often results in defects that cannot be closed primarily. In comparison to split-skin grafts, full-thickness skin grafts achieve a better cosmetic outcome but take with more difficulty. We aimed to study the outcome of full-thickness graft resurfacing of such defects. This study included 28 patients who underwent excision of a total of 30 lesions with full-thickness skin grafts. The data gathered included site and size of the lesion, level of excision, method of fixation of the graft, histology results, graft take and presence of donor and recipient complications. The median age of the patients was 87 years. The mean size of the defect was 18.03 cm(2) (roughly 6 x 4 cm(2)). The graft take was good (>80%) in 18 full-thickness skin grafts, while it was partial (50-75%) in 7 patients and was poor (25% or less) in 5 patients. All excision wounds healed without any need for further surgery. Donor site complications occurred in 2 patients. We conclude that, following excision of lower limb lesions, primary full-thickness skin grafting is an effective and safe method of resurfacing defects in the lower limbs with a very low incidence of donor site complications.Dermatology online journal 02/2008; 14(2):4.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) is commonly required for limb salvage in bone malignancies. Endoprosthetic failure is a term used to denote mechanical failure or infection usually requiring removal of the prosthesis. Treatment of infection consists of EPR revision with or without placement of a temporary spacer. Flap cover (either local or free) may be required if the overlying soft tissues are of concern. It is claimed that the investment of the endoprosthesis in well-vacularised soft tissue facilitates the eradication of infection. This series included nine patients with endoprosthetic failure due to chronic infection who needed flap cover. These patients underwent revision of the EPR in two stages. The first stage of revision included removal of the endoprosthesis, insertion of a spacer and soft tissue reconstruction. If serial sampling of the periprosthetic space failed to demonstrate microbial growth, the spacer was exchanged for an endoprosthesis. A total of nine patients underwent staged revision of endoprosthesis. In five patients cover was provided by a local pedicled flap and in four by a free flap. Patients undergoing cover by a broad flat musculocutaneous flap (i.e. free/pedicled latissimus dorsi) performed better. This study reports the results of attempted limb salvage in endoprosthetic failure due to infection in nine cases. Initial findings in this small series indicate that staged revision and soft tissue reconstruction in the form of muscle flap investment of the endoprosthesis carries a higher rate of successful limb salvage.International Orthopaedics 01/2007; 30(6):473-7. DOI:10.1007/s00264-006-0103-1 · 2.11 Impact Factor
- The Journal of Hand Surgery British & European Volume 01/2007; 31(6):694-5. DOI:10.1016/j.jhsb.2006.06.007 · 0.04 Impact Factor
- Dermatology online journal 02/2006; 12(1):21.
Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustChorley, England, United Kingdom