Jörg Schmidt

Publications of Jörg Schmidt

• Carvedilol versus metoprolol in patients undergoing direct percutaneous coronary interventions for myocardial infarction: effects on QT dynamicity.

  Authors: Hendrik Bonnemeier, Jasmin Ortak, Ralph Tölg, Maren Witt, Jörg Schmidt, Uwe K H Wiegand, Frank Bode, Heribert Schunkert, Gert Richardt

  Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE. 02/2005; 28 Suppl 1:S217-21.

  Beta-adrenergic blockers exert significant antiarrhythmic activity during ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the beneficial effects conferred by alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on ventricularBeta-adrenergic blockers exert significant antiarrhythmic activity during ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the beneficial effects conferred by alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on ventricular repolarization dynamicity in the acute phase of myocardial infarction (AMI), we compared carvedilol with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomized to metoprolol 200 mg/day versus carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram recorded upon hospital admission. Slopes of the linear QT/RR regression were determined before and after reperfusion. A total of 38 recordings of patients treated with metoprolol and 34 recordings of patients with carvedilol were eligible for analysis of QT/RR slopes. The two study groups were similar with respect to age, gender, TIMI perfusion grades, ventricular function, duration of ischemia, and site and size of infarction. Mean RR- and QT-intervals were similar to the metoprolol and carvedilol groups, before and after PCI. Likewise, there was no significant difference in QT/RR slopes between the metoprolol and carvedilol groups before PCI. In contrast, after PCI, there was a trend toward lower QT/RR slopes in the metoprolol group (from 0.18 +/- 0.07 to 0.17 +/- 0.08), and a significant decrease in QT/RR slopes in the carvedilol group (from 0.17 +/- 0.07 to 0.14 +/- 0.09). In patients undergoing successful direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a significant decrease in QT-RR slopes, suggesting greater cardiac electrical stability.

• Carvedilol versus metoprolol in the acute phase of myocardial infarction:.

  Authors: Hendrik Bonnemeier, Jasmin Ortak, Ralph Tölg, Maren Witt, Jörg Schmidt, Uwe K H Wiegand, Frank Bode, Heribert Schunkert, Gert Richardt

  Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE. 02/2005; 28 Suppl 1:S222-6.

  Beta-adrenergic blockers provide significant cardioprotection during acute ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the effects of additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on autonomic modulationBeta-adrenergic blockers provide significant cardioprotection during acute ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the effects of additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on autonomic modulation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), carvedilol was compared with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients (61.1 +/- 11 years; 23 females) undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomly assigned to metoprolol 200 mg/day vs carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered upon hospital admission, and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was recorded. A total of 40 recordings of patients assigned to metoprolol and 39 of patients assigned to carvedilol were eligible for analysis of heart rate turbulence. Turbulence onset (TO), turbulence slope (TS), and turbulence timing were measured after ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The mean value of the 10 preceding RR intervals (mean RR) before VPBs was also measured. There were no significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, TIMI perfusion grades, left ventricular ejection fraction, site and size of infarction, duration of ischemia, and mean 24-hour heart rate between the two groups. Though the mean RR were not significantly different (metoprolol 863.1 +/- 157 ms; carvedilol 839.6 +/- 151 ms), there was a trend toward lower values of TO in the carvedilol group (-0.015 +/- 0.016 vs -0.012 +/- 0.023%; P = NS) and significantly higher values for TS in the metoprolol group (6.96 +/- 5.8 vs 5.6 +/- 4.22; P < 0.05). Turbulence timing was similar in both groups (metoprolol 5.8 +/- 2.4 vs carvedilol 6.1 +/- 2.1). In patients undergoing direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a higher early acceleration and a lower deceleration of heart rate after VPBs, indicating differing effects on baroreceptor response due to additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade. These data offer new insights into effects of a broader antiadrenergic therapy on autonomic reflexes in the acute phase of AMI.