Publications (2)3.02 Total impact
-
Article: [Concordance between two methods of bronchoalveolar lavage for the microbiological diagnosis of pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients].
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Microbiological diagnosis of pneumonia allows the optimal use of antibiotics in mechanically ventilated patients. That is why samples of bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage had been quantitatively cultivated, but this procedure is not always possible. To evaluate the microbiological concordance between respiratory samples obtained by non-bronchoscopic protected bronchoalveolar lavage compared to the bronchoscopic ones, and to find out whether concordance was affected by previous use of antibiotics or the time of pneumonia onset. Prospective study conducted at Hospital Universitario San Vicente de Paúl, in 38 patients with suspected pneumonia in mechanical ventilation. Bronchoalveolar lavage specimens were taken by two methods, the traditional one and non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage, using a telescoping preformed tip catheter (Balcath). All samples were processed using conventional microbiologic protocols. Considering flexible bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage as the gold standard, cultures allowed the identification of at least one respiratory pathogen in 60.5% of cases. Diagnostic agreement was achieved in 82% of patients and 79% of microbiologic isolates. Using the Cohen's kappa coefficient, general concordance between both methods was 0.76 [0.60-0.93]; but in those who received previously antibiotics was 0.26 [0.05-0.48], versus 1.0 in those who did not (p<0.0001). Concordance did not differ significantly when cases of early or late pneumonia were compared. Concordance between non-bronchoscopic and bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage is good in mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia. However, the use of antibiotics previously, but not the time of pneumonia presentation, significantly decreases that concordance.Biomédica: revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud 12/2008; 28(4):551-61. · 0.55 Impact Factor -
Article: Diagnostic accuracy of bronchoalveolar lavage samples in immunosuppressed patients with suspected pneumonia: analysis of a protocol.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Fast and accurate etiologic diagnosis of pneumonia in immunocompromised patients is essential for a good outcome. Utility of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples has already been established, but studies about them are scarce and limited to few countries. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a diagnostic protocol, emphasizing on local epidemiology, rapidity, and yield of different techniques. One year prospective study of 101 consecutive immunosuppressed patients admitted with suspected pneumonia to a university hospital. They all had bronchoscopic BAL (n=109) and respiratory sampling. Conventional microbiological studies, cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia and transbronchial biopsy (TBB), whenever considered pertinent, were done. Results were analyzed along with other diagnostic procedures, clinical course and final outcome. HIV/AIDS infection was the most frequent cause of inclusion (n=80). Infections accounted for 79 out of 122 final diagnoses (64.8%). Our protocol identified 60 infectious and 3 noninfectious pathologies (general yield: 51.6%). Sensitivity in pulmonary infections was 75.9% (IC95%: 64.8-84.6%), specificity 86.0% (72.6-93.7%), positive predictive value 89.6% (79.1-95.3%), negative predictive value 69.4% (56.2-80.1%), accuracy 79.8% (71.7-86.2%). Mycobacterium spp. (n=27), bacteria (n=19), Pneumocystis jirovecii (n=18) and other fungi (histoplasmosis: 6, aspergillosis: 5, cryptococosis: 3) were the most common infectious pathogens. Direct microscopy allowed an early definite/presumptive diagnosis in 36/49 fungal and mycobacterial infections (73.5%). Up to 30% of mycobacterial infections were missed. Systematical study of BAL samples has a high diagnostic yield in our immunocompromised patients with suspected pneumonia. As economical and epidemiological conditions of regions are different, it should be tried everywhere.Respiratory Medicine 11/2007; 101(10):2160-7. · 2.47 Impact Factor
