Publications (3)6.88 Total impact
-
Article: Steroids with a carbamate function at C-17, a novel class of inhibitors for human and hamster steroid 5alpha-reductase.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In order to study the biological activity of the two novel steroidal carbamates derivatives: 8a and 8b, we determined the concentration of both compounds that inhibit the 50% of the activity of human prostate 5alpha-reductase enzyme, as well as the in vivo effect of these compounds in the weight of hamster prostate and flank organs diameter size. We determined also, the capacity of these steroids to bind to the androgen receptors present in the rat prostate cytosol. Furthermore the activity of these compounds on the mRNA expression of glycerol 3-phosphate acyl transferase (GPAT) in flank organs was analyzed by RT-PCR. This enzyme induces the triglycerides synthesis, which is increased by T in flank organs. The results from this study indicated that steroids 8a and 8b inhibited the human 5alpha-reductase activity. Compound 8b, which contains a bromine atom in the molecule, decreased the inhibitory effect of the human 5alpha-reductase activity, whereas steroid 8a, which lacks a halogen atom did not show any decrease in the activity of this enzyme. The competition studies demonstrated that 8a and 8b did not inhibit mibolerone binding to the androgen receptor present in the rat prostate cytosol. However, the in vivo activity of both steroids was similar; steroids 8a and 8b had a tendency to decrease the weight of the hamster prostate although this parameter was not statistically significant. These compounds also significantly reduced the diameter of the pigmented spot of hamster flank organs, which are androgen dependent skin's pilosebaceous structures. Steroids 8a and 8b, decreased the transcription of mRNA encoding for GPAT in intact hamster's flank organs topically treated in a similar way as in gonadectomized non-treated animals. These results suggest that mRNA encoding for GPAT is induced by DHT in this tissue.The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 11/2007; 107(1-2):48-56. · 3.05 Impact Factor -
Article: Gene conversion tracts associated with crossovers in Rhizobium etli.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Gene conversion has been defined as the nonreciprocal transfer of information between homologous sequences. Despite its broad interest for genome evolution, the occurrence of this mechanism in bacteria has been difficult to ascertain due to the possible occurrence of multiple crossover events that would mimic gene conversion. In this work, we employ a novel system, based on cointegrate formation, to isolate gene conversion events associated with crossovers in the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Rhizobium etli. In this system, selection is applied only for cointegrate formation, with gene conversions being detected as unselected events. This minimizes the likelihood of multiple crossovers. To track the extent and architecture of gene conversions, evenly spaced nucleotide changes were made in one of the nitrogenase structural genes (nifH), introducing unique sites for different restriction endonucleases. Our results show that (i) crossover events were almost invariably accompanied by a gene conversion event occurring nearby; (ii) gene conversion events ranged in size from 150 bp to 800 bp; (iii) gene conversion events displayed a strong bias, favoring the preservation of incoming sequences; (iv) even small amounts of sequence divergence had a strong effect on recombination frequency; and (v) the MutS mismatch repair system plays an important role in determining the length of gene conversion segments. A detailed analysis of the architecture of the conversion events suggests that multiple crossovers are an unlikely alternative for their generation. Our results are better explained as the product of true gene conversions occurring under the double-strand break repair model for recombination.Journal of Bacteriology 07/2005; 187(12):4116-26. · 3.83 Impact Factor -
Chapter: DNA Reiteration in Rhizobial Genomes: How Unusual is it?
12/2001: pages 277-278;
