Sarah N Casserley-Feeney

Publications (3)5.97 Total impact

• Article: The access randomized clinical trial of public versus private physiotherapy for low back pain.

  Sarah N Casserley-Feeney, Leslie Daly, Deirdre A Hurley
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Pragmatic randomized clinical trial. This study investigated differences in the clinical outcomes of public physiotherapy (public PT) versus private physiotherapy (private PT) for general practitioner-referred patients with acute and chronic low back pain (LBP). Health care setting (i.e., public or private) has been found to influence the course and clinical outcome of common diseases. Despite the international burden of LBP, the effect of health care setting on clinical outcomes has not been investigated in this population. One hundred sixty consenting patients, who were referred for physiotherapy for LBP by their general practitioner, completed the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (primary outcome), Short-Form 36 v2, Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, Back Beliefs Questionnaire, EuroQol EQ5D, and Patient Satisfaction Questionnaires. The patients were stratified (acute LBP: ≤ 3 months, n = 55; chronic LBP: > 3 months, n = 105), randomly allocated to receive public PT (n = 3 hospitals) or private PT (n = 12 clinics), and followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months postrandomization. Repeated measures analysis of variance showed significant improvement over time for 9 predominantly biomedical outcomes: (i) Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire at 3 and 6 months, (ii) Short-Form 36 v2 Physical Component Score, Bodily Pain, Role Physical, General Health, Vitality, EQ5D visual analogue scale, and weighted health index scores at 3 months, and (iii) the Back Beliefs Questionnaire at 6 months. The remaining 7 biopsychosocial outcomes showed no change over time, and the "between within" repeated measures analysis of variance showed no significant differences between groups over time for any outcome measures (P > 0.05). Independent samples t tests found no significant differences between groups in the mean changes in outcome measures from baseline at 12 months, apart from SF-36 v2 Role Physical (mean difference, 95% CI = 5.64 [0.860-10.428]; t = 2.337; P = 0.021) in favor of the private PT group. There were significantly higher levels of satisfaction with outcome of treatment in the private PT group (median [IQR]: public PT: 5.0 [2.0]; private PT: 6.0 [2.0]; Mann-Whitney U test = 1324.50; P = 0.020), but no differences in satisfaction with treatment or global perceived improvement (P > 0.05). The private PT group had a significantly shorter waiting time (mean difference = 39.79 days; 95% CI: 26.88-52.69; t = 6.121; P < 0.001) and treatment duration (mean difference: 23.48 days; 95% CI: 7.43-39.52; t = 2.909; P = 0.005) than public PT. Participants in both groups were treated with advice/education, manipulative therapy, and exercise therapy, with minimal use of cognitive behavioral approaches in either group. Physiotherapists in the private PT group had significantly more experience and more postgraduate qualifications than the public PT group (P < 0.005). Despite differences between public and private PT regarding waiting times for treatment and therapist experience, there were no significant differences between groups in the majority of clinical outcome measure scores at follow-up, apart from SF-36 Role Physical and satisfaction with treatment outcome in favor of the private PT group.
  Spine 02/2011; 37(2):85-96. · 2.08 Impact Factor
• Source

  Available from: Deirdre A Hurley

  Article: Patient satisfaction with private physiotherapy for musculoskeletal pain.

  Sarah N Casserley-Feeney, Martin Phelan, Fionnuala Duffy, Susan Roush, Melinda C Cairns, Deirdre A Hurley
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Despite emphasis on patient centred healthcare, healthcare professionals have been slow to use validated measurements of patient satisfaction in physiotherapy practice. The aim of this cross sectional survey was to measure patient satisfaction with private physiotherapy in Ireland, for patients with musculoskeletal pain, using a previously validated survey instrument. A multidimensional patient satisfaction questionnaire 'PTOPS', which assesses patient satisfaction with outpatient physiotherapy treatment, was translated from American English to European English, and relevant demographic and global satisfaction items were included. This was then circulated to patients with musculoskeletal pain (n = 240) for anonymous completion and return to the research team. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, v.12). In total 55% (n = 131/240) of questionnaires were returned. Just over half of the respondents were male (53.4%, n = 70), with a mean age (SD) of 37.7 years (12.4), and had previous experience of physiotherapy (65.6%, n = 86). The most common site of musculoskeletal pain was spinal (51.5% n = 66). The mean (SD) number of treatments was 8.3 (8.3), at a mean total cost (SD) of 350.2 euros (322.8 euros). The 'PTOPS' questionnaire categorised and scored satisfaction items under four domains, Enhancer, Detractor, Location and Cost. The mean score (SD), optimum score, and scoring range for each domain were: 'Enhancer' 41.2 (3.8), 50, 10-50; 'Detractor' 19.4 (4.4), 10, 10-50; 'Location' 28.0 (4.1), 35, 7-35; 'Cost' 18.9 (2.8), 7, 7-35. "Overall satisfaction with physiotherapy experience" was scored on a five-point scale "excellent to poor", with a modal response of "Very Good" (42%; n = 55). This study measured patient satisfaction with private physiotherapy treatment for musculoskeletal pain in Ireland using a previously validated outcome measure and provides a template for future studies of this increasingly important topic. Results demonstrated high levels of satisfaction with all components of physiotherapy treatment, except cost, and provided valuable patient feedback regarding their physiotherapy treatment for musculoskeletal pain. Results can be used by physiotherapists to improve future patient experiences with a view to improving patient attendance and compliance with physiotherapy treatment protocols for patients with musculoskeletal pain.
  BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 02/2008; 9:50. · 1.58 Impact Factor
• Article: Physiotherapy for low back pain: differences between public and private healthcare sectors in Ireland--a retrospective survey.

  Sarah N Casserley-Feeney, Gerard Bury, Leslie Daly, Deirdre A Hurley
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: European clinical guidelines for low back pain (LBP) recommend early referral of appropriate patients to health services such as physiotherapy. The current study aimed to investigate any differences between the physiotherapy management of LBP, and the physiotherapist and patient profiles in public and private health settings in Ireland. A retrospective chart survey of all LBP patients referred for physiotherapy to one Dublin City hospital and three neighbouring private practices in 2003 was conducted. In total, 249 physiotherapy charts (hospital [H] n=93; private practice [Pr] n=156) were identified and demographic, LBP, and management details analysed. Only charts containing full LBP duration and physiotherapy treatment data were included in the analysis of these parameters (LBP duration: H=84, Pr=130; physiotherapy treatment: H=79, Pr=155). There were significantly higher percentages of female (H=66%; Pr=50%: p=0.017), older (H=46 years; Pr=36 years: p<0.001), and chronic LBP patients (>12 weeks; H=50%; Pr=2%: p<0.001) in the public setting. Public patients had significantly longer waiting times for physiotherapy (median H=10 weeks; Pr=0; p<0.001), and more treatment (H=5.1; Pr=2.5: p0.001) than private patients. While treatment approaches were similar for both settings, there was a significantly higher use of advice and spinal stabilisation exercises in the public setting. However, there was minimal difference in the management of acute or chronic LBP in both setting suggesting poor adherence to European guidelines. Findings showed longer waiting times, and a higher number and duration of physiotherapy treatments for acute and chronic LBP in the public setting suggesting the need to develop publicly funded primary healthcare in Ireland.
  Manual therapy 07/2007; 13(5):441-9. · 2.32 Impact Factor