Randy Lieberman

Harper University Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, United States

Are you Randy Lieberman?

Claim your profile

Publications (20)105.66 Total impact

  • Randy A Lieberman
    Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 07/2011; 34(7):783-4. · 1.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a cost-effective tool with a high diagnostic yield in the evaluation of unexplained recurrent syncope. The Sleuth ILR (Transoma Medical, St. Paul MN, USA) is a new-generation ILR with wireless transmission capability approved by the Food and Drug Administration. We report the feasibility of achieving appropriate sensing over 1-year follow-up at the traditional midclavicular and alternative inframammary implantation sites without preimplant electrocardiogram (ECG) mapping. We studied 32 patients with unexplained syncope, aged 58.4+/-18.44 years, with an ILR implanted at the left midclavicular location (n = 17) or the left inframammary site (n = 15) over 1-year post implant. No preimplant electrocardiogram (ECG) mapping was performed. The highest R-wave amplitudes were observed at the inframammary site, but over the entire follow-up period, amplitudes were not significantly different from those at the midclavicular site. At both sites, R-wave amplitudes at the 6-month follow-up were significantly higher than those measured at 1 week. P-waves were visible in 80-90% of the patients. There was no discernible difference in P-waves (amplitude) relative to implant location. Body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, and age did not significantly influence the R-wave amplitude or the ability to discern P-waves. Our findings show that the Sleuth ILR implanted at both the midclavicular and inframammary locations without preimplant ECG mapping achieves acceptable "R" waves. This may simplify implantation procedures and improve patient satisfaction.
    Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 07/2010; 33(7):834-40. · 1.75 Impact Factor
  • Sony Jacob, Randy A Lieberman
    Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 04/2010; 3(2):214-7. · 5.95 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy is the standard of care for prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD), its underutilization is a clinical concern. We performed a retrospective study on patients who underwent cardiac catheterization at a tertiary medical center to identify those who were eligible for ICD therapy as per the guidelines and those who actually received it as a part of treatment. Surprisingly, only 4.4% of eligible patients received ICD for SCD prevention. Assuming that the major cause of this underutilization of ICD therapy was low referral, we performed a structured survey among the referring physicians to assess specialists' availability, primary care physicians' role in ICD referral, patient management concerns, familiarity with ICD guidelines, and economics of ICD implantation. Physician response rate of the survey was 51% (35/68). Survey results showed that the common reasons for underreferral included nonavailability of electrophysiologists (34%), poor quality of life of patients (25.7%), patients not being on optimal therapy (25.7%), and low awareness (22.85%). Subsequently, a Monte Carlo simulation was used to assess a hypothetical survival of the study cohort, which showed that in an "ideal scenario" of ICD implantation, the mortality in the study cohort was decreased by 6.9% and 12.3% at 2- and 5-year follow-up, respectively. This study highlights the underutilization of ICDs and the referring physicians' approach to this therapy.
    American journal of therapeutics 03/2010; 18(5):350-4. · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • Anupama Kottam, Sony Jacob, Randy A Lieberman
    Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 03/2009; 20(9):1070. · 3.48 Impact Factor
  • Journal of Cardiac Failure 08/2008; 14(6). · 3.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a totally subcutaneous, anteroposterior defibrillation shock pathway using a long time-constant shock waveform that emulates a proposed device having approximately twice the capacitance and thus twice the available energy of traditional transvenous devices. A non-transvenous defibrillation system potentially offers advantages over a transvenous system including simplification of the implant procedure and reduction of the impact of device complications by eliminating the need to place a lead within the heart. Previous non-transvenous defibrillation efficacy studies have been reported using anterolateral and anterior-anterior shock vectors. An external anteroposterior shock vector has demonstrated superior efficacy compared to anterolateral shock vectors but a prospective study on an anteroposterior shock vector with implanted electrodes has not been previously reported. The non-transvenous shock vector consisted of an anterior low pectorally-placed active can emulator electrode and a posterior subcutaneous coil electrode. The shock waveform was a biphasic with 50% tilt per phase and a time constant of decay of 12 ms. Defibrillation efficacy was characterized using a step-down defibrillation threshold protocol (35 J, 25 J, 15 J). A total of 33 patients with standard ICD indications were enrolled in the study with 32 fully completing the protocol. The patient population was 69% male, with a mean age of 59 +/- 12 years. Mean ejection fraction was 27 +/- 12%. Of the 32 patients tested, 26 patients (81%) were successfully defibrillated at 35 J or less, 18 patients were defibrillated at 25 J or less and 9 patients were successfully defibrillated at 15 J. Defibrillation using a long time-constant waveform delivered through an anteroposterior non-transvenous pathway including a pectoral active can emulator electrode and a posterior subcutaneous coil electrode is feasible with over 80% of patients defibrillated successfully using 35 J or less.
    Heart Rhythm 02/2008; 5(1):28-34. · 5.05 Impact Factor
  • Journal of Cardiac Failure - J CARD FAIL. 01/2008; 14(6).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dual-chamber pacing with His bundle pacing has theoretical advantages over conventional right ventricular (RV) apical pacing. We compared indexes of left ventricular (LV) function during acute dual-chamber pacing from the His bundle and other RV and LV pacing sites. Twelve patients (6 men; 63 +/- 11 years) with a standard indication for electrophysiologic study were included. Average QRS duration was 100 +/- 19 ms. Ejection fraction was 48 +/- 15%. A pressure-volume catheter was positioned in the left ventricle through the femoral arterial access. Pressure-volume loops were collected during atrial (AAI) and dual-chamber overdrive pacing at 82 +/- 15 beats/min after 2 minutes of hemodynamic stabilization. Ventricular pacing catheter position was randomized between the RV apex, RV septal, and free wall portions of the outflow tract, LV free wall, and His bundle. His bundle capture was verified from surface electrocardiographic morphometry using standard criteria. Atrioventricular delay was set to the P wave-His duration -10 ms to minimize the effects of fusion (96 +/- 22 ms). LV only pacing, but not His pacing, resulted in improved stroke work and stroke volume compared with alternate site RV pacing. No changes in +dP/dt, LV end-systolic pressure. LV end-diastolic pressure, or cycle efficiency, were observed between RV pacing sites. In conclusion, acute His bundle pacing did not improve LV function compared with alternate site RV pacing and may be inferior to LV pacing.
    The American Journal of Cardiology 12/2007; 100(10):1556-60. · 3.21 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Right ventricular (RV) apical pacing impairs left ventricular function by inducing dys-synchronous contraction and relaxation. Chronic RV apical pacing is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, morbidity, and even mortality. These observations have raised questions regarding the appropriate pacing mode and site, leading to the introduction of algorithms and new pacing modes to reduce the ventricular pacing burden in dual chamber devices, and a shift of the pacing site away from the RV apex. However, further investigations are required to assess the long-term results of pacing from alternative sites in the right ventricle, because long-term results so far are equivocal. The potential benefit of prophylactic biventricular, mono-chamber left ventricular, and bifocal RV pacing should be explored in selected patients with a narrow QRS complex, especially those with impaired left ventricular function. His bundle pacing is a promising and evolving technique that requires improvements in lead technology.
    Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 01/2007; 29 Suppl 2:S73-7. · 1.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We compared left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function during right ventricular (RV), LV, and biventricular (BiV) pacing in patients with narrow QRS duration with and without LV dysfunction. The optimal RV pacing lead location for patients with a standard indication for ventricular pacing remains controversial. Left ventricular pressure and volume data were determined via conductance catheter during electrophysiology study in 31 patients divided into groups with ejection fraction (EF) > or =40% (n = 17) or EF <40% (n = 14). QRS duration was 91 +/- 18 versus 106 +/- 25 ms, respectively (p = NS). Hemodynamic data were recorded during atrial and dual chamber pacing from the RV apex, RV free wall, RV septum, LV free wall, and BiV. In patients with EF > or =40%, RV pacing at 1 or more sites, but not LV free wall or BiV pacing, significantly (p < 0.05) impaired cardiac output (CO), stroke work (SW), EF, and LV relaxation compared with atrial overdrive pacing. Right ventricular pacing also impaired hemodynamics and LV function in patients with EF <40%. However, LV and BiV pacing increased CO, SW, EF, and LV +dP/dt(MAX) in patients with LV dysfunction. Left ventricular and BiV pacing enhanced an index of global LV cycle efficiency in patients with depressed EF. The detrimental hemodynamic effects of RV pacing were attenuated by selecting the optimal RV pacing site. Right ventricular pacing worsens LV function in patients with and without LV dysfunction unless the RV pacing site is optimized. Left ventricular and BiV pacing preserve LV function in patients with EF >40% and improve function in patients with EF <40% despite no clinical indication for BiV pacing.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology 11/2006; 48(8):1634-41. · 14.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reduced lead diameter and reliability can be designed into transvenous permanent pacing leads through use of redundant insulation and removal of the stylet lumen. The model 3830 lead (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) is a bipolar, fixed-screw, steroid-eluting, lumenless, 4.1-Fr pacing lead. Implantation can be performed in a variety of right heart sites using a deflectable catheter (Model 10600, Medtronic). Lead performance and safety were studied. Two prospective trials of 338 implanted subjects from 56 global sites were conducted. Electrical and safety data were obtained at implant, pre-discharge, and up to 18 months post-implant. Leads were implanted at traditional and alternate right heart sites. The study enrolled 338 subjects (204 males, 70.6 +/- 11.6 years) followed-up for a mean of 10.2 months (range, 0-21.6). Mean P-wave amplitudes ranged from 3.2 mV at 3 months to 2.9 mV at 18 months, while mean atrial pulse width thresholds at 2.5 V ranged from 0.07 ms at 3 months to 0.09 ms at 18 months. Mean R-wave amplitudes ranged from 11.3 mV to 11.1 mV and mean ventricular pulse width thresholds at 2.5 V ranged from 0.10 ms to 0.14 ms. There were 22 ventricular and 12 atrial lead complications within 3 months post-implant. Survival from lead-related complications improved to a clinically acceptable rate in the cohort of patients when revised implant techniques were employed. With the use of recommended implant techniques, the study results support the electrical efficacy and safety of a catheter-delivered, lumenless lead in traditional or alternate right atrium or right ventricle sites through 18 months post-implant.
    Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 09/2006; 29(8):858-65. · 1.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of implanting a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) system. Clinicians and patients require data on the safety of the CRT implant procedure to estimate procedural risk. We evaluated outcomes of transvenous CRT system implantation in 2,078 patients from the Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation (MIRACLE) study, the MIRACLE Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) study, and the InSync III study. We compared the MIRACLE study to the InSync III study and the MIRACLE ICD study randomized phase to its general phase to evaluate the effect of new technologies. The implant attempt succeeded in 1,903 of 2,078 (91.6%) patients. Implant time decreased from 2.7 h in the MIRACLE study to 2.3 h in the InSync III study (p < 0.001), and from 2.8 h in the MIRACLE ICD study randomized phase to 2.4 h in the general phase (p < 0.001). The implant procedure produced 62 perioperative complications in 53 (9.3%) MIRACLE trial patients; 159 in 135 (21.1%) MIRACLE ICD study randomized phase patients and 71 in 62 (13.9%) general phase patients (p < 0.05 vs. randomized); and 41 in 37 (8.8%) InSync III study patients (p = NS vs. the MIRACLE study). We observed 73 postoperative complications in 62 (11.7%) MIRACLE trial patients, 77 in 68 (11.9%) MIRACLE ICD study randomized phase patients and 56 in 45 (11.0%) general phase patients (p = NS), and 37 in 34 (8.6%) InSync III study patients (p = NS). A total of 8% of patients required reoperation to treat lead dislodgement, extracardiac stimulation, or infection during follow-up. Transvenous CRT system implantation appears safe, well-tolerated, has a high success rate, and improves with operator experience and the addition of new technologies.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology 12/2005; 46(12):2348-56. · 14.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure have not been fully elucidated. The Multicenter InSync ICD Randomized Clinical Evaluation II (MIRACLE ICD II) was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled clinical trial of CRT in NYHA class II heart failure patients on optimal medical therapy with a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction < or =35%, a QRS > or =130 ms, and a class I indication for an ICD. One hundred eighty-six patients were randomized: 101 to the control group (ICD activated, CRT off) and 85 to the CRT group (ICD activated, CRT on). End points included peak VO2, VE/CO2, NYHA class, quality of life, 6-minute walk distance, LV volumes and ejection fraction, and composite clinical response. Compared with the control group at 6 months, no significant improvement was noted in peak VO2, yet there were significant improvements in ventricular remodeling indexes, specifically LV diastolic and systolic volumes (P=0.04 and P=0.01, respectively), and LV ejection fraction (P=0.02). CRT patients showed statistically significant improvement in VE/CO2 (P=0.01), NYHA class (P=0.05), and clinical composite response (P=0.01). No significant differences were noted in 6-minute walk distance or quality of life scores. In patients with mild heart failure symptoms on optimal medical therapy with a wide QRS complex and an ICD indication, CRT did not alter exercise capacity but did result in significant improvement in cardiac structure and function and composite clinical response over 6 months.
    Circulation 12/2004; 110(18):2864-8. · 15.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Selective site right ventricular pacing has been suggested as an approach to reduce the incidence of ventricular dysfunction and hopefully influence the morbidity resulting from traditional right ventricular apical pacing. Pacing from the right ventricular apex allows a stable ventricular rate, and together with atrial pacing and sensing, helps maintain atrioventricular synchrony but does not allow physiological activation of the left ventricle. Traditional atrial pacing sites like the right atrial appendage may encourage atrial tachyarrhythmias, whereas lead placement in right atrial septal sites may reduce the frequency of symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia episodes, especially when combined with prevention algorithms. Researchers attempting to pace the heart from these selective sites have been hindered by the lack of uniform definitions of where these sites actually lie and the inadequacy of tools to consistently reach these locations and verify correct placement. This lack of definition consensus may have contributed to the apparent conflict of data, particularly in the right ventricle. There is an urgent need for a standardization of terms and identifying measures for selective pacing sites.
    Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 07/2004; 27(6 Pt 2):883-6. · 1.75 Impact Factor
  • Nicholas Z Kerin, Randy A Lieberman
    American Journal of Therapeutics - AM J THER. 01/2004; 11(6).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) through biventricular pacing is an effective treatment for heart failure (HF) with a wide QRS; however, the outcomes of patients requiring CRT and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy are unknown. To examine the efficacy and safety of combined CRT and ICD therapy in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV congestive HF despite appropriate medical management. Randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled trial conducted from October 1, 1999, to August 31, 2001, of 369 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or less, QRS duration of 130 ms, at high risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, and in NYHA class III (n = 328) or IV (n = 41) despite optimized medical treatment. Of 369 randomized patients who received devices with combined CRT and ICD capabilities, 182 were controls (ICD activated, CRT off) and 187 were in the CRT group (ICD activated, CRT on). The primary double-blind study end points were changes between baseline and 6 months in quality of life, functional class, and distance covered during a 6-minute walk. Additional outcome measures included changes in exercise capacity, plasma neurohormones, left ventricular function, and overall HF status. Survival, incidence of ventricular arrhythmias, and rates of hospitalization were also compared. At 6 months, patients assigned to CRT had a greater improvement in median (95% confidence interval) quality of life score (-17.5 [-21 to -14] vs -11.0 [-16 to -7], P =.02) and functional class (-1 [-1 to -1] vs 0 [-1 to 0], P =.007) than controls but were no different in the change in distance walked in 6 minutes (55 m [44-79] vs 53 m [43-75], P =.36). Peak oxygen consumption increased by 1.1 mL/kg per minute (0.7-1.6) in the CRT group vs 0.1 mL/kg per minute (-0.1 to 0.8) in controls (P =.04), although treadmill exercise duration increased by 56 seconds (30-79) in the CRT group and decreased by 11 seconds (-55 to 12) in controls (P<.001). No significant differences were observed in changes in left ventricular size or function, overall HF status, survival, and rates of hospitalization. No proarrhythmia was observed and arrhythmia termination capabilities were not impaired. Cardiac resynchronization improved quality of life, functional status, and exercise capacity in patients with moderate to severe HF, a wide QRS interval, and life-threatening arrhythmias. These improvements occurred in the context of underlying appropriate medical management without proarrhythmia or compromised ICD function.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 05/2003; 289(20):2685-94. · 29.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    01/2003;
  • Nicholas Z Kerin, Randy A Lieberman
    American Journal of Therapeutics 11(6):489-93. · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • Tamam Mohamad, Shalini Modi, Randy Lieberman
    Heart Rhythm. 3(5):S9.

Publication Stats

1k Citations
105.66 Total Impact Points

Institutions

  • 2004–2011
    • Harper University Hospital
      Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • 2009
    • Wayne State University
      • Division of Cardiology
      Detroit, MI, United States
  • 2007
    • University of Florence
      • Dipartimento di Chirurgia e Medicina Traslazionale (DCMT)
      Florence, Tuscany, Italy