Claire F Young

London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada

Are you Claire F Young?

Claim your profile

Publications (7)3.33 Total impact

  • Article: Tibial tubercle osteotomy in total knee arthroplasty surgery.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) is a recognized technique for improving exposure when performing total knee arthroplasty surgery. Forty-two patients were reviewed at a mean of 8 years after TTO. Preoperatively, mean extension was 8 degrees +/- 14 degrees , mean flexion 74 degrees +/- 30 degrees , and Knee Society score 73 +/- 37. At latest follow-up, mean extension was 4 degrees +/- 15 degrees , mean flexion 91 degrees +/- 22 degrees , and Knee Society score 124 +/- 42.6 (P < or = .0001). Seventy-three percent of patients had an excellent/good score at latest follow-up. Twenty-five percent of patients experienced no extensor lag, and 66% of extensor lags had resolved within 6 months. Mean time for osteotomy union was 14 weeks. In this series, TTO performed to enhance surgical exposure did not adversely affect the outcome after total knee arthroplasty but resulted in serious complications in 5% of patients.
    The Journal of Arthroplasty 04/2008; 23(3):371-5. · 2.38 Impact Factor
  • Article: Principles of plaster application.
    Claire F Young, Fares Haddad
    British journal of hospital medicine (London, England: 2005) 02/2007; 68(1):M13-4. · 0.19 Impact Factor
  • Chapter: Minimally Invasive Hip Replacement: Separating Fact from Fiction
    Claire F. Young, Robert B. Bourne
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Total hip arthroplasty is one of the most successful procedures introduced in the twentieth century. Hip surgery performed through a small incision has been widely promoted [1]. Although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) total hip replacement has been greeted with enthusiasm by those wishing to embrace the technique; others have voiced concern or even scepticism. Those extolling the virtue of the minimally invasive approach tout the potential benefits, such as reduced soft tissue trauma, reduced postoperative pain, and quicker rehabilitation. Sceptics of minimally invasive hip arthroplasty are concerned by increased operative difficulty, reduced visualization of the operative landmarks, the increased risk of complications, and the obvious downside of a learning curve associated with the introduction of new techniques. The question remains “Are minimally invasive hip arthroplasties safe and as efficacious as conventional hip replacements?” To date, there has been widespread marketing both to surgeons and to the public about the proposed merits of MIS techniques, but few objective data have been published on this topic. This chapter reviews the technique and published literature to delineate the advantages and pitfalls of performing minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty surgery.
    12/2006: pages 183-193;
  • Article: Tibial and fibula fractures.
    Claire F Young, Fares Haddad
    British journal of hospital medicine (London, England: 2005) 07/2006; 67(6):M116-8. · 0.19 Impact Factor
  • Article: Fractures around the knee.
    Claire F Young, Fares Haddad
    British journal of hospital medicine (London, England: 2005) 06/2006; 67(5):M96-8. · 0.19 Impact Factor
  • Article: Femoral shaft fracture.
    Claire F Young, Fares Haddad
    British journal of hospital medicine (London, England: 2005) 05/2006; 67(4):M74-5. · 0.19 Impact Factor
  • Article: Injuries of the humeral shaft.
    Claire F Young
    British journal of hospital medicine (London, England: 2005) 12/2005; 66(11):M74-5. · 0.19 Impact Factor

Institutions

  • 2005–2008
    • London Health Sciences Centre
      • Division of Orthopaedic Surgery
      London, Ontario, Canada