Publications (4)26.7 Total impact
-
Article: Development and validation of a colon cancer risk assessment tool for patients undergoing colonoscopy.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Diagnostic criteria for hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) are complex. "Open-access" colonoscopy makes it challenging to identify who needs genetic evaluation, intensive surveillance, and screening for extracolonic tumors. Our aim was to develop a simple, preprocedural risk assessment tool to identify who may be at highest risk for CRC. A total of 631 outpatients undergoing colonoscopy at two academic practices completed a questionnaire assessing personal and family histories of CRC, polyps, and Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated malignancies. Subjects were considered to be high-risk if one of the nine prespecified characteristics of hereditary CRC syndromes was met. Through recursive partitioning analysis, an algorithm of fewest questions needed to capture the most high-risk individuals was developed. The results were validated in 5,335 individuals undergoing colonoscopy at five private endoscopy centers and tested in 285 carriers of mismatch repair mutations associated with LS. About 17.7% and 20.0% of individuals were classified as high-risk in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Recursive partitioning revealed three questions that were most informative for identifying high-risk patients: (i) "Do you have a first-degree relative with CRC or LS-related cancer diagnosed before age 50?" (ii) "Have you had CRC or polyps diagnosed before age 50?" (iii) "Do you have > or =3 relatives with CRC?" When asked successively, these questions identified 77% of high-risk individuals in both cohorts and 271 of 285 (95%) of mutation carriers. Approximately one in five individuals undergoing colonoscopy would benefit from further risk assessment. We developed a simple, three-question CRC Risk Assessment Tool to identify the majority of patients who require additional assessment and possible genetic evaluation.The American Journal of Gastroenterology 06/2009; 104(6):1508-18. · 7.28 Impact Factor -
Article: Development and Validation of a Colon Cancer Risk Assessment Tool for Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: Diagnostic criteria for hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) are complex. "Open-access" colonoscopy makes it challenging to identify who needs genetic evaluation, intensive surveillance, and screening for extracolonic tumors. Our aim was to develop a simple, preprocedural risk assessment tool to identify who may be at highest risk for CRC.The American Journal of Gastroenterology 04/2009; 104(6):1508-1518. · 7.28 Impact Factor -
Article: Validation of a clinical prediction rule for severe acute lower intestinal bleeding.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Acute lower intestinal bleeding is a heterogeneous disorder and identification of high-risk patients is challenging. We previously retrospectively identified predictors of severity in patients with acute lower intestinal bleeding. The aim of this study was to prospectively validate a clinical prediction rule for severe acute lower intestinal bleeding. This was a prospective, observational cohort study of consecutive patients admitted to an academic, tertiary care or a community-based teaching hospital for management of acute lower intestinal bleeding. Data were collected on seven previously identified predictors of severe bleeding: heart rate > or = 100/min, systolic blood pressure < or = 115 mmHg, syncope, nontender abdominal exam, rectal bleeding in the first 4 h of evaluation, aspirin use, and >2 comorbid conditions. Severe bleeding was defined as transfusion of > or =2 units of red blood cells, and/or a decrease in hematocrit of > or =20% in the first 24 h, and/or recurrent rectal bleeding after 24 h of stability (accompanied by a further decrease in hematocrit of > or =20%, and/or additional blood transfusions, and/or readmission for acute lower intestinal bleeding within 1 wk of discharge). Patients were stratified into 3 risk groups according to the previously developed prediction rule: low (no risk factors), moderate (1-3 risk factors), and high (>3 risk factors). A total of 275 patients with acute lower intestinal bleeding were identified. The risk of severe bleeding in each risk category was similar in the validation and derivation cohorts (p values >0.05): low risk 6%versus 9%, moderate risk 43%versus 43%, and high risk 79%versus 84%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.754 for the validation cohort and 0.761 for the derivation cohort. The magnitude of the risk score was significantly correlated with major clinical outcomes including surgery, death, blood transfusions, and length of stay. We have developed and prospectively validated a clinical prediction rule for acute severe lower intestinal bleeding. This prediction rule could improve the triage of patients to appropriate levels of care and interventions, and guide a more standardized approach to acute lower intestinal bleeding.The American Journal of Gastroenterology 08/2005; 100(8):1821-7. · 7.28 Impact Factor -
Article: The clinical significance of right-sided colonic inflammation in patients with left-sided chronic ulcerative colitis.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Rarely, patchy right colonic inflammation has been observed in patients with left sided chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC), but the clinical significance of this finding is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and pathologic features and natural history of CUC patients with left-sided colitis combined with patchy right colonic inflammation and to compare the clinical course to a control group of patients with isolated left-sided CUC. Twelve patients with clinically and pathologically confirmed left-sided CUC, but also with patchy right colonic inflammation, were identified from a cohort of 352 consecutive patients with CUC who underwent colonoscopy at the Brigham and Women's Hospital between 1996 and 2000. In this cohort, 127 patients had left-sided colitis. As the first study to use controls in this setting, 35 consecutive patients with left-sided CUC, but without patchy right colonic inflammation, were selected and evaluated during the same time period. In all patients, the medical records were reviewed for a wide variety of clinical, endoscopic, and pathologic features. The mean follow-up time for the study and control groups was 105 +/- 128 and 112 +/- 80 months, respectively. Patients in the study group were significantly older than the control group at the time of diagnosis (47 +/- 17 years vs 35 +/- 14 years, p = 0.048), but the two groups had a similar gender distribution (25% male vs 40% male), prevalence of extraintestinal manifestations (25% vs 11%), frequency of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (75% vs 50%), family history of colitis (27% vs 15%), current tobacco use (8% vs 3%), history of appendectomy (8% vs 0%), and overall severity of disease (33% vs 46%). None of the patients in the study group, and only one control patient, had disease progression to pancolitis. One study patient developed high-grade dysplasia in the rectum that required a colectomy. None of the study or control patients developed clinical or pathologic features of Crohn's disease. Rarely patients with left-sided CUC may have patchy right colonic inflammation. The clinical features and natural history of patients with left-sided CUC and patchy right colonic inflammation is similar to patients with isolated left-sided CUC.Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 06/2004; 10(3):215-9. · 4.86 Impact Factor -
Article: Clinical significance of right colonic inflammation in patients with left sided chronic ulcerative colitis: A study of 34 patients
Gastroenterology 01/2001; 120(5). · 11.68 Impact Factor
Top Journals
Institutions
-
2005–2009
-
Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Center for Brain Mind Medicine
Boston, MA, USA
-
-
2004
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, MA, USA
-