Jukka T Randell

Publications (3)13.02 Total impact

• Article: Health risk assessment of indoor air pollution in Finnish ice arenas.

  Raimo O Salonen, Arto S Pennanen, Mikko Vahteristo, Petri Korkeila, Sari Alm, Jukka T Randell
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Poor indoor air quality and epidemic carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)) poisonings due to exhaust emissions from ice resurfacers have been continuously reported from enclosed ice arenas for over 30 years. The health risks in users of Finnish ice arenas were analysed in three ways: (1) evaluation of four cases of epidemic CO poisonings, (2) modelling the association between NO(2) exposure and respiratory symptoms among junior ice hockey players, and (3) estimation of the number of arena users at risk of breathing poor quality air due to non-compliance of ice arenas with recommended abatement measures. The common causes for the CO poisonings involving over 300 subjects were large emissions from propane-fuelled ice resurfacer, small arena volume, negligible ventilation, and very recent opening of the arena. Rhinitis (prevalence 18.3%) and cough (13.7%) during or after training or game were significantly associated with the estimated personal NO(2) exposure of young hockey players (n=793) to average concentrations ranging from 21 to 1176 microg/m(3) in their home arena. During a 6-year follow-up of an intensive information campaign the portion of electric resurfacers increased from 9% to 27%, and that of emission control technology on propane-fuelled resurfacers increased from 13% to 84%. The portion of inadequately ventilated arenas decreased from 34% to 25%. However, 48% of the investigated Finnish ice arenas (n=125) did not fully comply with the non-regulatory recommendations. Consequently, 20000 daily users of ice arenas were estimated to remain in 2001 at risk of breathing poor quality air. Modern small and inadequately ventilated ice arenas pose their users (mostly children and young adults) at risk of breathing poor quality air and suffering from acute adverse health effects. Governmental regulations are needed worldwide to ensure safe sports in enclosed ice arenas.
  Environment International 02/2008; 34(1):51-7. · 5.30 Impact Factor
• Article: Interpretation of cough provoked by airway challenges.

  Heikki O Koskela, Kirsi M Kontra, Minna K Purokivi, Jukka T Randell
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: To analyze the cough response to three airway challenges in order to clarify whether the recording of the provoked coughs would be beneficial in the management of asthma. A prospective study. University hospital. Fifteen healthy subjects, 16 steroid-naïve subjects with asthma, and 16 subjects with steroid-treated asthma. Inhalation challenges with isotonic histamine, hypertonic saline solution, and hypertonic histamine, using an ultrasonic nebulizer and 2-min tidal breathing method. Airflow parameters were measured with a spirometer, and the coughs were recorded manually. Coughing during the isotonic histamine challenge was associated with the degree of the bronchoconstriction induced. When this was taken into account, the healthy subjects coughed as frequently as the asthmatic subjects. During the two hypertonic challenges, the asthmatic subjects coughed more frequently than did the healthy subjects when the induced bronchoconstriction had not yet developed. At that stage of the hypertonic saline solution challenge, the mean coughing frequency was 0.7 coughs per minute (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 1.3 coughs per minute) for the healthy subjects, 2.7 coughs per minute (95% CI, 0.8 to 4.5 coughs per minute) for the steroid-naïve asthmatic subjects, and 1.3 coughs per minute (95% CI, 0.6 to 1.9 coughs per minute) for the steroid-treated asthmatic subjects (p = 0.018). For the hypertonic histamine challenge, the respective values were 0.8 coughs per minute (95% CI, 0.4 to 1.2 coughs per minute), 3.6 coughs per minute (95% CI, 2.4 to 4.9 coughs per minute), and 2.1 coughs per minute (95% CI, 1.0 to 3.1 coughs per minute; p = 0.001). This cough did not correlate with airway hyperresponsiveness. Coughing during isotonic histamine challenge seems to be a manifestation of bronchoconstriction, and recording of the coughs may not provide additional information to airflow measurements. Frequent coughing during hypertonic saline solution and hypertonic histamine challenges in the absence of bronchoconstriction is a pathologic phenomenon. Sensitivity to the cough-provoking effect of hypertonic challenges seems to be enhanced in patients with asthma but unrelated to airway hyperresponsiveness. Therefore, the recording of the provoked coughs during these challenges may add to the information obtained from airflow measurements.
  Chest 12/2005; 128(5):3329-35. · 5.25 Impact Factor
• Article: Hypertonicity of the challenge solution may increase the diagnostic accuracy of histamine challenge.

  Heikki O Koskela, Kirsi M Kontra, Minna K Purokivi, Jukka T Randell
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: There is significant overlap in the responsiveness to direct airway challenges, such as the histamine challenge, between asthmatic and non-asthmatic subjects, which decreases their accuracy in the diagnosis of asthma. To minimise this overlap, a new test, hypertonic histamine challenge, was developed. Fifteen healthy subjects, 16 subjects with steroid-naive asthma, and 16 asthmatic subjects undergoing inhaled corticosteroid treatment underwent inhalation challenges with hypertonic saline, isotonic histamine, and hypertonic histamine, using an ultrasonic nebuliser and 2-min tidal breathing method. The increase in histamine solution tonicity decreased the histamine PC20 values only in the steroid-naive asthmatic subjects (1.1 (0.5-2.7) vs. 0.5 (0.2-1.2) mg/ml, P = 0.047). Using 1mg/ml as the cut-off value, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the hypertonic histamine challenge to detect steroid-naive asthma was 81%, 100%, and 90%. The respective values for the isotonic histamine challenge were 56%, 100%, and 77%. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference in the hypertonic histamine PC20 between steroid-naive and steroid-treated asthmatic subjects, which could not be detected in the isotonic histamine PC20. The hypertonic histamine PC20 was highly repeatable, with a single determination 95% range of +/-1.35 doubling concentrations. The hypertonic histamine challenge was safe but provoked more cough and throat irritation than the other two challenges. In conclusion, compared with a conventional, isotonic histamine challenge, hypertonic histamine challenge may be more accurate in the diagnosis of asthma and also, more capable to detect the effects of inhaled corticosteroid treatment.
  Respiratory Medicine 07/2005; 99(6):726-34. · 2.47 Impact Factor