Maryanne Brown

Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Are you Maryanne Brown?

Claim your profile

Publications (3)2.79 Total impact

  • Article: The relationship between care providers' relational behaviors and residents mood and behavior in long-term care settings.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Care providers' interactions with residents are an important element in long-term care settings. This study aimed at examining the association between care providers' relational behaviors and affect and mood of residents with dementia over different caregiving situations and with different residents. This study utilized a repeated-measures design. Thirty-eight residents with a diagnosis of dementia and 35 care providers from three nursing homes in Ontario, Canada, participated in the study. Care providers' relational behaviors and residents' mood and affect were assessed using direct observation methods and self-rating scales. The care providers' relational behavior varied according to the caregiving situation, with the most effective relational behaviors observed during interpersonal interactions and the least effective during mealtimes. Less effective relational behaviors were observed between care providers and residents that were perceived as more resistive to care. In addition, effective relational behaviors were associated with positive mood and affect of the residents. These findings emphasize the importance of acknowledging and enhancing care providers' relational behaviors when caring for persons with dementia living in long-term care settings.
    Aging and Mental Health 11/2011; 16(4):507-15. · 1.37 Impact Factor
  • Article: Effects of director of care support on job stress and job satisfaction among long-term care nurse supervisors.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The provision of care for frail older adults in Long-term care settings is challenging. It requires not only specialized knowledge and skills, but also supportive commitment on the part of directors of care to their nurse supervisors (registered nurses and registered practical nurses) and unregulated healthcare staff. In these complex work environments, communication and leadership are critical to staff job satisfaction. Therefore, it is essential that directors of care represent a source of support for their nurse supervisors. The purpose of this multi-site study was to examine the relationships among perceived support from directors of care, and nurse supervisors' job stress and job satisfaction. Forty-five per cent of the total variance in job satisfaction of nurse supervisors was explained by supervisory support, stress and job category (registered nurse vs. registered practical nurse). Greater supervisory support was also associated with reduced job stress. These findings are essential in developing strategies to improve the nurse supervisory role in long-term care settings.
    Nursing leadership (Toronto, Ont.) 02/2007; 20(3):52-66.
  • Article: Enhancing the quality of supportive supervisory behavior in long-term care facilities.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The practices of managers and registered nurses (RNs) in long-term care facilities are frequently ineffective in assisting the licensed practical nurses (LPNs) and healthcare aides (HCAs) whom they supervise. Little research exists that examines the area of supportive relationships between nursing staff and supervisors in these settings. The purpose of this study was to gather data that could improve management practices in long-term care residential facilities and enhance the quality of the supervisory relationships between supervisors (nurse managers and RNs) and care providers (HCAs and LPNs) in these settings. The study also identified factors that influence the supervisors' ability to establish supportive relationships with care providers. The challenges and barriers to nurse managers and leaders related to enacting supportive behaviors are discussed as well as their implications for long-term care settings.
    JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration 05/2005; 35(4):181-7. · 1.42 Impact Factor