-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency and predictors of stent thrombosis (ST) after stenting for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Stent thrombosis remains a major concern with STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Consecutive patients (N = 1,640) undergoing stenting for STEMI were prospectively enrolled in our database and followed for 1 to 15 years. Bare-metal stents were implanted from 1995 to 2002, and drug-eluting and bare-metal stents were implanted from 2003 to 2009. Stent thrombosis was defined as definite or probable.
Our population had a high risk profile, including a high incidence of Killip class III to IV (11.5%) and STEMI due to ST (10.2%). Stent thrombosis occurred in 124 patients, including 42 with early ST (0 to 30 days), 35 with late ST (31 days to 1 year), and 47 with very late ST (>1 year). The frequency of ST was 2.7% at 30 days, 5.2% at 1 year, and 8.3% at 5 years. Independent predictors of early or late ST were STEMI due to ST (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.27 to 8.45), small stent size (HR: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.49 to 4.00), Killip class III to IV (HR: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.30 to 4.40), and reperfusion time ≤2 h (HR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.03 to 4.24). Drug-eluting stent was the only independent predictor of very late ST (HR: 3.73, 95% CI: 1.81 to 7.88).
Stent thrombosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention is relatively frequent and continues to increase out to 5 years. New strategies are needed to prevent ST in STEMI patients, and targeted therapies are needed in patients identified at highest risk.
10/2012; 5(10):1043-51. · 1.07 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency of very late stent thrombosis (VLST) after stenting with bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Stent thrombosis occurs more frequently after stenting for STEMI than after elective stenting, but there are little data regarding VLST.
Consecutive patients (n = 1,463) who underwent stenting for STEMI were prospectively enrolled in our database. BMS were implanted exclusively from 1995 to 2002, and DES and BMS were implanted from 2003 to 2009. Follow-up was obtained at 1 to 15 years.
BMS patients (n = 1,095) were older and had more shock, whereas DES patients (n = 368) had more diabetes and smaller vessels. Stent thrombosis occurred in 107 patients, of which 42 were VLST (>1 year). Stent thrombosis continued to increase to at least 11 years with BMS and to at least 4.5 years with DES. Stent thrombosis rates with BMS versus DES were similar at 1 year (5.1% and 4.0%, respectively) but increased more with DES after the first year (1.9%/year vs. 0.6%/year, respectively). Landmark analysis (>1 year) found DES had a higher frequency of VLST (p < 0.001) and reinfarction (p = 0.003). DES was the only significant independent predictor of VLST (hazard ratio: 3.79, 95% confidence interval: 1.64 to 8.79, p = 0.002).
VLST after primary PCI for STEMI occurs with relatively high frequency to at least 11 years with BMS and to at least 4.5 years with DES. Very late stent thrombosis and reinfarction (>1 year) were more frequent with DES. New strategies are needed to manage this problem.
01/2011; 4(1):30-8. · 1.07 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study compared late survival after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with cardiogenic shock due to right ventricular (RV) infarction versus left ventricular (LV) pump failure. Consecutive patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary PCI (n = 2,496) were prospectively enrolled in a registry from 1984 to 2004. Cardiogenic shock occurred before PCI in 189 patients (7.6%). Shock was attributed to predominant RV infarction when there was right coronary artery occlusion with preserved LV function and increased right atrial pressure. Patients with shock due to RV infarction (n = 30) versus LV pump failure (n = 136) had fewer previous infarctions (10% vs 29%, p = 0.03), less multivessel disease (20% vs 47%, p = 0.007), higher right atrial pressure (21 vs 16 mm, p = 0.003), and better LV ejection fraction (57% vs 32%, p <0.001). In-hospital mortality was lower with shock due to RV infarction (23% vs 50%, p = 0.01), and shock due to RV infarction was a significant independent predictor of late cardiac survival (hazard ratio 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.62, p = 0.002). In conclusion, survival after primary PCI in patients with shock due to RV infarction is better than that in patients with shock due to LV pump failure. This is in contrast to most previous reports. Improved survival is likely related to lower risk profile and previously documented substantial recovery of RV function after primary PCI.
The American Journal of Cardiology 03/2007; 99(4):431-5. · 3.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of door-to-balloon time with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on late cardiac mortality.
The impact of door-to-balloon time on outcomes is controversial, and the impact on late mortality has not been studied.
Consecutive patients (n = 2,322) treated with primary PCI from 1984 to 2003 were prospectively identified and followed up for a median of 83 months.
Prolonged door-to-balloon times (0 to 1.4 h vs. 1.5 to 1.9 h vs. 2.0 to 2.9 h vs. > or =3.0 h) were associated with higher in-hospital mortality (4.9% vs. 6.1% vs. 8.0% vs. 12.2%, p < 0.0001) and late mortality (12.6% vs. 16.4% vs. 20.4% vs. 27.1% at 7 years, p < 0.0001) and were an independent predictor of late mortality by Cox regression (p = 0.0004). Prolonged door-to-balloon times (> or =2 h vs. <2 h) were associated with higher late mortality in high-risk patients (32.5% vs. 21.5%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22 to 1.90; p = 0.0002) but not in low-risk patients (10.8% vs. 9.2%; HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.64; p = 0.53) and in patients presenting early (< or =3 h) (24.7% vs. 15.0%; HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.24 to 1.90; p = 0.0001) but not late (>3 h) (21.1% vs. 18.5%; HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.45; p = 0.80).
Delays in door-to-balloon time impact late survival in high-risk but not low-risk patients and in patients presenting early but not late after the onset of symptoms. These findings have implications for the triage of patients for primary PCI.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 02/2006; 47(2):289-95. · 14.16 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to saphenous vein graft (SVG) occlusion has been associated with poor procedural results and poor short-term outcomes, but long-term graft patency and patient survival have not been evaluated. Consecutive patients (n = 2,240) with STEMI treated with primary PCI from 1984 to 2003 were followed for 6.6 years (median). Follow-up angiography was obtained in 80% of hospital survivors following primary PCI for SVG occlusion at 2.3 years (median). Patients with primary PCI for SVG occlusion (n = 57) vs. native artery occlusion had more prior MI, advanced Killip class, and three-vessel coronary disease and lower acute ejection fraction (EF). Patients with SVG occlusion had lower rates of TIMI 3 flow post-PCI (80.7% vs. 93.6%; P = 0.0001), higher in-hospital mortality (21.1% vs. 8.0%; P = 0.0004), and lower follow-up EF (49.3% vs. 54.7%; P = 0.055). Culprit SVGs were patent in 64% of patients at 1 year and 56% at 5 years. Late survival was strikingly worse in patients with primary PCI for SVG occlusion vs. native vessel occlusion (49% vs. 76% at 10 years), and SVG occlusion was the second strongest predictor of late cardiac mortality by multivariate analysis (HR = 2.11; 95% CI = 1.38-3.23; P = 0.0006). Patients with STEMI due to SVG occlusion treated with primary PCI have poor acute procedural results, frequent late reocclusion, and very high late mortality. The introduction of new adjunctive therapies (distal protection, thrombectomy, and drug-eluting stents) may improve short-term outcomes, but improved long-term outcomes may require new and more durable revascularization strategies.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 09/2005; 65(4):504-9. · 2.29 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: ST-segment resolution (STR) is a surrogate end point in reperfusion trials of acute myocardial infarction, but there are few data regarding the optimum methods of measurement, clinical predictors, and correlation with late cardiac mortality. Consecutive patients (n = 1,005) who had acute myocardial infarction and >/=2 mm ST-segment elevation controlled with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) constituted our study group. Follow-up was obtained in 97% of patients at a median of 6.2 years. STR measured as maximum ST-segment elevation after PCI provided better discrimination of late cardiac mortality than did STR measured as percent resolution. Complete STR (<1.0 mm ST-segment elevation after PCI) was achieved in only 42% of patients. Anterior infarction, Killip's class 3 to 4, and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grades <2 before PCI and <3 after PCI were strong independent predictors of partial or poor STR. STR (complete [<1.0 mm] vs partial [1.0 to 2.0 mm] vs poor [>2.0 mm]) correlated with in-hospital mortality (4.0% vs 6.7% vs 11.6%, p = 0.005), reinfarction (1.4% vs 3.4% vs 6.1%, p = 0.01), and late cardiac mortality (17% vs 25% vs 44%, p <0.0001). Correlation with late mortality was stronger for nonanterior than for anterior infarction. Poor STR was a strong independent predictor of late mortality (hazard ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.50, p = 0.028), even after adjusting for Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow. These data support the use of STR as a simple method to stratify patients by risk after primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction and support the use of STR as a surrogate end point in reperfusion trials of acute myocardial infarction.
The American Journal of Cardiology 03/2005; 95(3):343-8. · 3.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The roles of reimbursement and other predictors that affect physicians’ willingness to accept publicly insured continuing
care patients were examined in a national survey. The response rate was 47%. Eighty-eight percent of the respondents were
accepting new patients. Forty-two percent of these physicians were willing to accept new continuing care patients insured
by Medicaid, 70% reported accepting those paying by Medicare assignment, and 85% said they accept patients covered by Medicare
plus balance-billing payments. Low reimbursement was the strongest predictor for lack of acceptance. The results suggest that
systems of multitiered reimbursement are associated with diminished access for patients insured in the lower tiers.
Journal of General Internal Medicine 04/1995; 10(6):345-348. · 2.83 Impact Factor
