-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Dofetilide is currently recommended as second-tier therapy to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and normal left ventricular function, yet limited data support this recommendation. We examined the safety and efficacy of dofetilide in this setting through a retrospective chart review. We evaluated patients who had symptomatic PAF, normal left ventricular function, and no significant valvular disease. The end points were complete suppression of symptomatic PAF and subjective symptomatic improvement with dofetilide treatment. Over a 3-year period, 34 patients who had failed previous antiarrhythmic therapy were included. Of these, 3 discontinued dofetilide treatment before discharge. Of the remaining 31 who continued treatment after discharge, it was eventually discontinued in 13. At 12 months, symptomatic improvement was observed in 18 of 31 patients, 6 of whom remained asymptomatic. Treatment with dofetilide in this study was successful in less than 1 in 5 patients. Despite careful precautions, serious proarrhythmias, the major limiting side effect of dofetilide, still occurred during long-term follow-up.
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics 04/2007; 12(1):36-43. · 1.75 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a new alternative which affords symptomatic improvement in two-thirds of patients who exhibit medically refractory congestive heart failure (CHF) as well as significant prolongation of the QRS duration (>135 msec). As more experience with CRT accrues, unexpected complications of this promising therapy may become apparent. Herein, we describe a patient with severe ischemic cardiomyopathy and refractory CHF who developed incessant ventricular tachycardia (VT) after the initiation of biventricular pacing. The patient is a 75-year-old man who suffered an inferior myocardial infarction 6 years before presenting for CRT. He underwent a three-vessel CABG in 1997. Subsequently, episodes of near syncopal sustained VT developed, for which he received a dual chamber ICD. In 2001 he developed refractory CHF and ECG revealed LBBB with a QRS duration of 195 msec. Shortly after the initiation of biventricular pacing, the patient developed multiple episodes of drug resistant monomorphic VT that could be terminated only transiently by ICD therapies. Ultimately, the only intervention, which proved to be effective in eliminating VT episodes, was inactivation of LV pacing. Despite subsequent therapeutic regimen of sotalol, lidocaine, tocainide, and quinidine all subsequent attempts to reactivate LV pacing resulted in prompt VT recurrence. CONCLUSION: This case represents a clear example of CRT induced proarrhythmia, which required inactivation of LV pacing for effective acute management. Such an intervention should be considered in CRT patients who exhibit a notable increase in drug refractory VT episodes.
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 07/2005; 16(6):655-8. · 3.06 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study examined the risk of proarrhythmic events in patients receiving antiarrhythmic drugs for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) according to present-day safety guidelines.
Advances in understanding the proarrhythmic risk of antiarrhythmic drugs has led to development of safety guidelines for these agents. Such guidelines were used in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study.
This study was an analysis of the risk of arrhythmic events (arrhythmic death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), and torsade de pointes VT) in the antiarrhythmic drug arm of the AFFIRM study. Each time an antiarrhythmic drug was begun, it was counted as an exposure to that drug and the risk of an arrhythmic event was calculated.
A total of 2,033 patients received 3,030 exposures to antiarrhythmic drugs. Ninety-six arrhythmic events occurred by six years. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction <40% had more arrhythmic events. Twelve documented cases of torsade de pointes VT were noted. The incidence of torsade de pointes was 0.6% at five years (95% confidence interval 0.32 to 1.07).
The overall risk of adverse arrhythmic events upon exposure to antiarrhythmic drugs in the AFFIRM study was reasonably low. Strict criteria for the safe use of antiarrhythmic drugs were successful in minimizing proarrhythmic events.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 09/2004; 44(6):1276-82. · 14.16 Impact Factor