-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Drug development is a high-risk and high failure enterprise, and studies that provide an early read on the pharmacodynamic activity of novel compounds could save time and money, increasing the efficiency of the drug development process.
Preclinical and clinical experiments were designed to examine the utility of the scopolamine-induced cognitive impairment model in predicting pharmacodynamic signals of putatively procognitive compounds, utilizing the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor donepezil for illustration.
In normal healthy rats, scopolamine (0.3 mg/kg) significantly impaired performance on the two-platform water maze and on the T-maze. The deficits in water maze performance were reversed by donepezil at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg. There was a trend towards reversal of scopolamine-induced deficits in performance on the T-maze with 1.0 mg/kg donepezil. In normal healthy humans, scopolamine (0.3 and 0.5 mg) reliably impaired performance on the Cognitive Drug Research test battery composite scores (power of attention, continuity of attention, quality of working memory, quality of episodic secondary memory, and speed of memory) in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Donepezil (10 mg) significantly attenuated the scopolamine-induced impairment in cognition on power of attention, continuity of attention, quality of working memory, and speed of memory.
These findings suggest that reversal of scopolamine-induced cognitive impairment is a viable model for predicting pharmacodynamic signals of procognitive compounds in both animals and humans. The utility of the scopolamine-induced cognitive impairment model is discussed and illustrated at various decision points in drug development, with a focus on Go/No Go decisions.
Psychopharmacologia 09/2011; 220(1):97-107. · 4.08 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Extended-release divalproex sodium (divalproex-ER) biopharmaceutics after every-12-hour (q12h) administration was compared with that of once-daily divalproex-ER and conventional divalproex given every 6 hours (q6h) in a multiple-dose (14-day), randomized, three-period crossover design study in 24 patients with epilepsy concomitantly receiving enzyme-inducing antiepileptic medication(s). Plasma valproic acid (VPA) minimum concentration (Cmin) for divalproex-ER q12h was higher than the once-daily divalproex-ER Cmin (P=0.043). Once-daily divalproex-ER Cmin values were not different from those for divalproex q6h, suggesting that adequate trough steady-state concentrations are maintained with once daily dosing, despite enzyme-inducing comedication. The degree of peak-trough fluctuation (DFL, calculated as (Cmax-Cmin)/Cavg) in VPA concentration was less with both q12h (35.2% less) and once-daily (16.9% less) divalproex-ER regimens compared with q6h divalproex (P0.024). The DFL for divalproex-ER dosed as a q12h regimen was 22% less than that for once-daily divalproex-ER (P=0.02). The DFL in VPA concentration with divalproex-ER can be minimized with once-daily administration and more so with q12h administration, compared with conventional enteric-coated divalproex taken q6h.
Epilepsy & Behavior 04/2006; 8(2):391-6. · 2.34 Impact Factor
-
Chetan S Karyekar,
Rajendra S Pradhan,
Tony Freeney,
Qin Ji,
Timi Edeki,
Wenzi Chiu,
Walid M Awni, Charles Locke,
Lewis B Schwartz,
Richard G Granneman,
Robert O'Dea
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: ABT-578, a sirolimus analog, is being developed for administration from drug-eluting stents to prevent postimplantation neointimal hyperplasia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of multiple doses of ABT-578. Healthy subjects randomly received placebo or ABT-578 (200, 400, or 800 microg) as daily intravenous infusions for 14 days. ABT-578 blood pharmacokinetics and urine excretion on days 1 and 14 were determined. The effect of ABT-578 on mitogen-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation was assessed. ABT-578 pharmacokinetics was described by a 3-compartment open model. The mean CL, V(ss), and t(1/2) ranges were 4.0 to 4.6 L/h, 92.5 to 118.0 L, and 24.7 to 31.0 hours, respectively. ABT-578 pharmacokinetics was dose and time invariant. Approximately 0.1% of ABT-578 was excreted in the urine. ABT-578 was well tolerated, and no systemic changes were observed in the mitogen-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation. ABT-578 was shown to be safe over a wide range of systemic exposures.
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 09/2005; 45(8):910-8. · 2.91 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Levothyroxine (LT4) has a narrow therapeutic index. Consequently, precise standards for assessing the bioequivalence of different LT4 products are vital. We examined the methodology that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends for comparing the bioavailability of LT4 products, as well as three modifications to correct for endogenous, thyroxine (T4) levels, to determine if the methodology could distinguish LT4 products that differ by 12.5%, 25%, or 33%. With no baseline correction for the endogenous T4 pool, differences in administered LT4 doses that differed by 25%-33% could not be detected (450 microg and 400 microg doses versus 600 microg dose, respectively). The three mathematical correction methods could distinguish the doses that differed by 25% and 33%. None of the correction methods could distinguish dosage strengths that differed by 12.5% (450 microg versus 400 microg). Dose differences within this range are known to result in clinically relevant differences in safety and effectiveness. Methods of analysis of bioequivalence data that do not consider endogenous T4 concentrations confound accurate quantitation and interpretation of LT4 bioavailability. As a result, products inappropriately deemed bioequivalent may put patients at risk for iatrogenic hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism. More precise methods for defining bioequivalence are required in order to ensure that LT4 products accepted as bioequivalent will perform equivalently in patients without the need for further monitoring and retitration of their dose.
Thyroid 04/2004; 14(3):191-200. · 4.79 Impact Factor
