Preeti K Parhar

Publications (2)8.57 Total impact

• Article: Decreasing temporal lobe dose with five-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy for treatment of pituitary macroadenomas.

  Preeti K Parhar, Tamara Duckworth, Parinda Shah, J Keith DeWyngaert, Ashwatha Narayana, Silvia C Formenti, Jinesh N Shah
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: To compare temporal lobe dose delivered by three pituitary macroadenoma irradiation techniques: three-field three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), three-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (3F IMRT), and a proposed novel alternative of five-field IMRT (5F IMRT). Computed tomography-based external beam radiotherapy planning was performed for 15 pituitary macroadenoma patients treated at New York University between 2002 and 2007 using: 3D-CRT (two lateral, one midline superior anterior oblique [SAO] beams), 3F IMRT (same beam angles), and 5F IMRT (same beam angles with additional right SAO and left SAO beams). Prescription dose was 45 Gy. Target volumes were: gross tumor volume (GTV) = macroadenoma, clinical target volume (CTV) = GTV, and planning target volume = CTV + 0.5 cm. Structure contouring was performed by two radiation oncologists guided by an expert neuroradiologist. Five-field IMRT yielded significantly decreased temporal lobe dose delivery compared with 3D-CRT and 3F IMRT. Temporal lobe sparing with 5F IMRT was most pronounced at intermediate doses: mean V25Gy (% of total temporal lobe volume receiving ≥25 Gy) of 13% vs. 28% vs. 29% for right temporal lobe and 14% vs. 29% vs. 30% for left temporal lobe for 5F IMRT, 3D-CRT, and 3F IMRT, respectively (p < 10(-7) for 5F IMRT vs. 3D-CRT and 5F IMRT vs. 3F IMRT). Five-field IMRT plans did not compromise target coverage, exceed normal tissue dose constraints, or increase estimated brain integral dose. Five-field IMRT irradiation technique results in a statistically significant decrease in the dose to the temporal lobes and may thus help prevent neurocognitive sequelae in irradiated pituitary macroadenoma patients.
  International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 12/2009; 78(2):379-84. · 4.59 Impact Factor
• Article: Pharmacogenomics and breast cancer.

  Stella C Lymberis, Preeti K Parhar, Evangelia Katsoulakis, Silvia C Formenti
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Germline variants can be used to study breast cancer susceptibility as well as the variable response to both drug and radiation therapy used in the treatment of breast cancer. In addition to germline high-penetrance mutations important in familial and hereditary breast cancer, a substantial component of breast cancer risk can be attributed to the combined effect of many low-risk germline polymorphisms involved in relevant pathways like those of DNA repair, adhesion, carcinogen and estrogen metabolism. Additionally, the identification of sequence variants in genes involved in response to chemotherapy and radiation treatment, has created the opportunity to apply genomics to individualized treatment. The continued insight into the molecular pathways involved in drug and radiation response has enabled progress in tailoring therapies in such a way as to both maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity. Polymorphisms in genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters and drug targets can be used to predict toxicity and response to pharmacologic agents used in breast cancer treatment. Similarly, germline variants in genes involved in DNA repair, radiation-induced fibrosis and reactive oxygen species may be used to predict response to radiation therapy. As a result, pharmacogenomics is rapidly evolving to affect the entire spectrum of breast cancer management, influencing both prevention and treatment choices.
  Pharmacogenomics 02/2004; 5(1):31-55. · 3.97 Impact Factor