Janet Winston

Publications (9)28.81 Total impact

• Article: Alcohol consumption in relation to aberrant DNA methylation in breast tumors.

  Meng Hua Tao, Catalin Marian, Peter G Shields, Jing Nie, Susan E McCann, Amy Millen, Christine Ambrosone, Alan Hutson, Stephen B Edge, Shiva S Krishnan, Bin Xie, Janet Winston, Dominica Vito, Marcia Russell, Thomas H Nochajski, Maurizio Trevisan, Jo L Freudenheim
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: The mechanism for the observed association of alcohol consumption breast cancer risk is not known; understanding that mechanism could improve understanding of breast carcinogenesis and optimize prevention strategies. Alcohol may impact breast malignancies or tumor progression by altering DNA methylation. We examined promoter methylation of three genes, the E-cadherin, p16, and retinoic acid-binding receptor-β2 (RAR-β2) genes in archived breast tumor tissues from participants in a population-based case-control study. Real time methylation-specific PCR was performed on 803 paraffin-embedded samples, and lifetime alcohol consumption was queried. Unordered polytomous and unconditional logistic regression were used to derive adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RAR-β2 methylation was not associated with drinking. Among premenopausal women, alcohol consumption was also not associated with promoter methylation for E-cadherin and p16 genes. In case-case comparisons of postmenopausal breast cancer, compared with lifetime never drinkers, promoter methylation likelihood was increased for higher alcohol intake for E-cadherin (OR=2.39; 95% CI, 1.15-4.96), in particular for those with estrogen receptor-negative tumors (OR=4.13; 95% CI, 1.16-14.72), and decreased for p16 (OR=0.52; 95% CI, 0.29-0.92). There were indications that the association with p16 was stronger for drinking at younger ages. Methylation was also associated with drinking intensity independent of total consumption for both genes. We found alcohol consumption was associated with DNA methylation in postmenopausal breast tumors, suggesting that the association of alcohol and breast cancer may be related, at least in part, to altered methylation, and may differ by drinking pattern.
  Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.) 12/2010; 45(7):689-99. · 2.41 Impact Factor
• Article: Alcohol consumption and breast tumor mitochondrial DNA mutations.

  Mary E Platek, Peter G Shields, Duanjun Tan, Catalin Marian, Matthew R Bonner, Susan E McCann, Jing Nie, Gregory E Wilding, Christine Ambrosone, Amy E Millen, Maurizio Trevisan, Marcia Russell, Thomas H Nochajski, Stephen B Edge, Janet Winston, Jo L Freudenheim
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations are frequent in breast tumors, but the etiology of these mutations is unknown. We hypothesized that these mutations are associated with exposures that affect oxidative stress such as alcohol metabolism. Using archived tumor blocks from incident breast cancer cases in a case control study, the Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer (WEB) study, analysis of mtDNA mutations was conducted on 128 breast cancer cases selected based on extremes of alcohol intake. Temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TTGE) was used to screen the entire mtDNA genome and sequencing was completed for all TTGE positive samples. Case-case comparisons were completed using unconditional logistic regression to determine the relative prevalence of the mutations by exposures including alcohol consumption, manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) genotype, nutrient intake related to oxidative stress and established breast cancer risk factors. Somatic mtDNA mutations were found in 60 of the 128 tumors examined. There were no differences in the prevalence of mtDNA mutations by alcohol consumption, MnSOD genotype or dietary intake. The likelihood of mtDNA mutations was reduced among those with a positive family history for breast cancer (OR = 0.33, CI = 0.12-0.92), among postmenopausal women who used hormone replacement therapy (OR = 0.46, CI = 0.19-1.08, P = 0.08) and was increased for ER negative tumors (OR = 2.05, CI = 0.95-4.43, P = 0.07). Consistent with previous studies, we found that mtDNA mutations are a frequent occurrence in breast tumors. An understanding of the etiology of mtDNA mutations may provide insight into breast carcinogenesis.
  Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 10/2009; 121(2):453-60. · 4.43 Impact Factor
• Article: DNA promoter methylation in breast tumors: no association with genetic polymorphisms in MTHFR and MTR.

  Meng Hua Tao, Peter G Shields, Jing Nie, Catalin Marian, Christine B Ambrosone, Susan E McCann, Mary Platek, Shiva S Krishnan, Bin Xie, Stephen B Edge, Janet Winston, Dominica Vito, Maurizio Trevisan, Jo L Freudenheim
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Aberrant promoter methylation is recognized as an important feature of breast carcinogenesis. We hypothesized that genetic variation of genes for methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and methionine synthase (MTR), two critical enzymes in the one-carbon metabolism, may alter DNA methylation levels and thus influence DNA methylation in breast cancer. We evaluated case-control association of MTHFR C677T, A1298C, and MTR A2756G polymorphisms for cases strata-defined by promoter methylation status for each of three genes, E-cadherin, p16, and RAR-beta2 in breast cancer; in addition, we evaluated case-case comparisons of the likelihood of promoter methylation in relation to genotypes using a population-based case-control study conducted in Western New York State. Methylation was evaluated with real-time methylation-specific PCRs for 803 paraffin-embedded breast tumor tissues from women with primary, incident breast cancer. We applied unordered polytomous regression and unconditional logistic regression to derive adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We did not find any association of MTHFR and MTR polymorphisms with breast cancer risk stratified by methylation status nor between polymorphisms and likelihood of promoter methylation of any of the genes. There was no evidence of difference within strata defined by menopausal status, estrogen receptor status, folate intake, and lifetime alcohol consumption. Overall, we found no evidence that these common polymorphisms of the MTHFR and MTR genes are associated with promoter methylation of E-cadherin, p16, and RAR-beta2 genes in breast cancer.
  Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers &amp Prevention 03/2009; 18(3):998-1002. · 4.12 Impact Factor
• Article: DNA hypermethylation and clinicopathological features in breast cancer: the Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer (WEB) Study

  Meng Hua Tao, Peter G. Shields, Jing Nie, Amy Millen, Christine B. Ambrosone, Stephen B. Edge, Shiva S. Krishnan, Catalin Marian, Bin Xie, Janet Winston, Dominica Vito, Maurizio Trevisan, Jo L. Freudenheim
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Aberrant DNA hypermethylation of gene promoter regions has been increasingly recognized as a common molecular alteration in carcinogenesis. We evaluated the association between major clinicopathological features and hypermethylation of genes in tumors among 803 incidence breast cancer cases from a large population-based case–control study conducted in Western New York State. DNA samples were isolated from archive paraffin embedded tumor tissue and were analyzed for hypermethylation status of the E-cadherin, p16, and RAR-β 2 genes using real time methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. The frequencies of hypermethylation were 20.0% for E-cadherin, 25.9% for p16, and 27.5% for RAR-β 2 genes. For postmenopausal women, hypermethylation of E-cadherin tended to be more likely in progesterone receptor (PR) negative than in PR-positive tumors (odds ratio (OR), 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.91–2.18). Hypermethylation of p16 tended to be more frequent among estrogen receptor (ER) negative cases than ER-positive cases (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.01–2.32). Hypermethylation of RAR-β 2 gene was inversely associated with histological and nuclear grade of breast cancer.
  Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 01/2009; 114(3):559-568. · 4.43 Impact Factor
• Article: Plasminogen activator system localization in 60 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ.

  Thelma C Hurd, Sheila Sait, Shin Kohga, Janet Winston, Maisie Martinick, Rakhee Saxena, Heather Lankes, Gabor Markus, Shashi Harvey, John F Gibbs
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: The lack of prognostic factors in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) that reliably identifies biologically aggressive tumors adversely affects optimal management. The urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) system, comprised of its receptor, uPAR, and its inhibitor (PAI-1), are critical elements for tumor invasion and their expression in invasive breast cancer can predict clinical outcome. Expression of the uPA system in DCIS may be relevant in defining histological subsets of DCIS with invasive potential. Localization of uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 was investigated immunohistochemically in 60 DCIS tumors. FISH experiments were performed to determine whether uPA was present in cancer cells themselves or derived from stromal elements. uPA was ubiquitously expressed in the malignant ductal epithelium of 95% (57/60) of DCIS tumors studied. uPA-mRNA was detected in the malignant ductal epithelium but not the adjacent normal ductal epithelium and stromal elements. uPAR was expressed in 27% (6/22) of high-grade and 24% (9/38) of non-high-grade DCIS. In comparing coexpression, uPA and uPAR were coexpressed in only 25% (15/60) of tumors. PAI-1 was infrequently expressed in high grade (3/22) and absent in non-high-grade DCIS. This study identifies the presence of uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 in both high-grade and non-high-grade DCIS. It may be speculated that coexpression of uPA and its receptor may identify subsets of DCIS with an increased risk for progression to invasive disease. If so, then expression of uPA system components may have prognostic and therapeutic significance in DCIS.
  Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2007; 14(11):3117-24. · 4.17 Impact Factor
• Article: Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the mandible with cytogenetic and molecular biology aberrations.

  Sadir J Alrawi, Dongfeng Tan, Maureen Sullivan, Janet Winston, Thom Loree, Wesley Hicks, Nestor Rigual
  Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 09/2005; 63(8):1216-21. · 1.64 Impact Factor
• Article: Prostate derived Ets transcription factor shows better tumor-association than other cancer-associated molecules.

  Ali Ghadersohi, Kunle Odunsi, Shashikant Lele, Yvonne Collins, William R Greco, Janet Winston, Ping Liang, Ashwani K Sood
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: We previously reported that prostate derived Ets transcription factor (PDEF) is a breast tumor-associated molecule. To obtain further insights into PDEF expression in other human tumor types, a cDNA library database from human adult normal and tumor tissues was compiled and searched for PDEF distribution. The results showed that PDEF is present at relative higher frequencies in the cDNA libraries from brain, breast, lung and ovarian tumors in comparison to those from the corresponding normal tissues. RT/PCR analysis of PDEF expression in ovarian tumors confirmed that PDEF is expressed in 36 out of 51 (71%) ovarian tumors. Further comparison of the distribution of PDEF with other widely recognized cancer-associated molecules showed that PDEF has more restricted distributions than Her-2/neu, Bcl-2, survivin or telomerase in cDNA libraries from normal human tissues and more increased distribution than Her-2/neu, CA-125, Bcl-2, survivin and telomerase in cDNA libraries from brain (except survivin), breast, lung and ovarian tumors. These data together show a better tumor-association for PDEF and suggest that PDEF is a more suitable target for developing specific cancer therapies.
  Oncology Reports 03/2004; 11(2):453-8. · 1.84 Impact Factor
• Article: HER-2/neu protein expression and gene alteration in stage I-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer: a study of 140 cases using a combination of high throughput tissue microarray, immunohistochemistry, and fluorescent in situ hybridization.

  Dongfeng Tan, George Deeb, Jianmin Wang, Harry K Slocum, Janet Winston, Sam Wiseman, Amy Beck, Sheila Sait, Timothy Anderson, Chukwumere Nwogu, Nithya Ramnath, Gregory Loewen
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Regarding HER-2/neu expression (gene or protein level) in lung cancer, several studies with inconsistent results have been recently reported, partially due to variable techniques used and/or heterogeneous populations examined. The objective of this study was to examine HER-2/neu expression in a well-defined cohort of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and in nonneoplastic lung tissue utilizing a combination of high-density tissue microarray, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) under uniform test conditions. One hundred forty stage I-IIIA primary NSCLCs and 38 non-neoplastic lung samples were examined. IHC, using an FDA-approved Hercept monoclonal antibody kit, was performed and HER-2/neu gene alteration was assessed by FISH. The association of expression of HER-2/neu with clinicopathologic parameters was analyzed. Ninety-four percent of tumor samples (131/140) were fully interpretable after tissue processing. Twenty-five of them (19%) overexpressed (2+, 3+) HER-2/neu, while 106 (81%) had no or weak expression. All thirty-four interpretable non-neoplastic lung samples were negative for HER-2/neu alteration at protein and gene level. HER-2/neu protein overexpression correlated well with HER-2/neu gene amplification (r =.83, P < 0.001). HER-2/neu overexpression was significantly associated with histologic subtype: 19 adenocarcinomas (19/82, 23%) versus 4 squamous cell carcinomas (4/44, 9%) overexpressed Her-2/neu (P = 0.04). Statistical significance was observed between HER-2/neu expression and tumor differentiation, with strong positive (3+) expression observed more frequently in poorly differentiated tumors (P = 0.01). Patients with HER-2/neu abnormalities, particularly HER-2/neu gene amplification, exhibited a shorter survival (P = 0.043). The statistically significant difference (P < 0.005) between HER-2/neu alteration in tumor samples(25/131, 19%) and in the nonneoplastic tissue (0/34, 0%) implies that HER-2/neu may have a role in the carcinogenesis of NSCLC. The findings provide evidence supporting the hypothesis that the HER-2/neu receptor may represent a useful molecular target in the treatment of NSCLC. The significant association of HER-2/neu expression and gene amplification with poorly differentiated carcinoma compared with well differentiated carcinoma suggests that HER-2/neu may be involved in NSCLC tumor evolution. Patients with HER-2/neu gene amplification and strong positive expression of HER-2/neu protein showed a strong tendency toward shorter survival.
  Diagnostic Molecular Pathology 12/2003; 12(4):201-11. · 2.26 Impact Factor
• Article: Tumor antigens and markers for breast and ovarian cancers.

  Ali Ghadersohi, Kasyapa Chitta, William R Greco, Shashi Harvey, Janet Winston, Harry Slocum, Kunle Odunsi, Ashwani K Sood
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Use of vaccines to prevent and treat breast and ovarian cancer is a highly attractive approach because of the expected minimal side effects and the potential to predict individuals likely to benefit from vaccination. To fully harness the capacity of the immune system for this purpose, it is necessary to characterize tumor antigens for these cancers so that purified antigens can be tested for their immunogenicity in individual patients and for their suitability as targets of vaccine-induced immunity. Discovery of novel breast and ovarian tumor antigens is also necessary for developing multi-antigen vaccines composed of multiple tumor antigens. Such vaccines are expected to induce diverse immune responses and minimize emergence of antigen-loss variant tumors that are resistant to vaccine-induced immunity. With the exception of melanomas, for most human cancers including breast and ovarian cancers the repertoire of known tumor antigens remains relatively small. In this review we will discuss the importance of characterizing tumor antigens for use in vaccination against cancer and then summarize antigens that have been characterized for human breast and ovarian cancers. We will also emphasize that identification of a novel tumor antigen, while an important first step, needs to be followed by a multi-step process of validation of that antigen. The steps in this validation process are i) to demonstrate that a tumor antigen is over-expressed at a reasonable frequency in primary tumors and in metastases; ii) to demonstrate the immunogenicity of a tumor antigen in an appropriate animal model; iii) to demonstrate its immunogenicity and safety in humans. Additional considerations in this review include: i) discussion of the potential of breast and ovarian tumor antigens as markers for early detection and for monitoring tumor burden in cancer patients; ii) discussion of their potential as prognostic markers of breast and ovarian cancers; and iii) discussion of a unique class of tumor antigens and markers that induce expression of multiple other tumor antigens and markers. Finally, we will discuss the present evidence for potential for autoimmunity that might accompany antitumor vaccination.
  Frontiers in Bioscience 03/2002; 7:e48-57. · 3.52 Impact Factor