Are you Sébastien Hapdey?

Claim your profile

Publications (4)19.16 Total impact

  • Article: Reproducibility of the adaptive thresholding calibration procedure for the delineation of 18F-FDG-PET-positive lesions.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the robustness of the calibration procedure against the counting statistics and lesion volumes when using an adaptive thresholding method for the delineation of 2-[F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (F-FDG)-PET-positive tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three data sets obtained from physical and simulated images of a phantom containing hot spheres of known volume and contrast were used to study the robustness of the calibration procedure against the counting statistics and range of volumes and contrasts for a given PET model. The mathematical expression of the adaptive thresholding method used corresponds to a linear relationship between the optimal threshold value and the inverse of the local contrast. Robustness was evaluated by testing whether the slopes and intercepts of the linear expression found under two experimental conditions were significantly different (P<0.05). RESULTS: It was found that the calibration step was not sensitive to the PET device for the studied PET model, nor to the counting statistics for a signal-to-noise ratio higher than 5.7. No statistical difference was found in the calibration step when using a wide range of volumes (0.2-200 ml) and contrasts (2.0-20.6) or more restricted ones (0.43-97.3 ml and 2.0-7.7, respectively). Therefore, a calibration procedure using limited experimental conditions can be applied to a wider range of volumes and contrasts. CONCLUSION: These results show that the manufacturer could propose simulated or experimental raw data corresponding to a given PET model with high counting statistics, allowing each clinical center to reconstruct calibration images according to the algorithm parameters used in the clinic.
    Nuclear Medicine Communications 03/2013; · 1.40 Impact Factor
  • Article: Comparative assessment of methods for estimating tumor volume and standardized uptake value in (18)F-FDG PET.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In (18)F-FDG PET, tumors are often characterized by their metabolically active volume and standardized uptake value (SUV). However, many approaches have been proposed to estimate tumor volume and SUV from (18)F-FDG PET images, none of them being widely agreed upon. We assessed the accuracy and robustness of 5 methods for tumor volume estimates and of 10 methods for SUV estimates in a large variety of configurations. PET acquisitions of an anthropomorphic phantom containing 17 spheres (volumes between 0.43 and 97 mL, sphere-to-surrounding-activity concentration ratios between 2 and 68) were used. Forty-one nonspheric tumors (volumes between 0.6 and 92 mL, SUV of 2, 4, and 8) were also simulated and inserted in a real patient (18)F-FDG PET scan. Four threshold-based methods (including one, T(bgd), accounting for background activity) and a model-based method (Fit) described in the literature were used for tumor volume measurements. The mean SUV in the resulting volumes were calculated, without and with partial-volume effect (PVE) correction, as well as the maximum SUV (SUV(max)). The parameters involved in the tumor segmentation and SUV estimation methods were optimized using 3 approaches, corresponding to getting the best of each method or testing each method in more realistic situations in which the parameters cannot be perfectly optimized. In the phantom and simulated data, the T(bgd) and Fit methods yielded the most accurate volume estimates, with mean errors of 2% +/- 11% and -8% +/- 21% in the most realistic situations. Considering the simulated data, all SUV not corrected for PVE had a mean bias between -31% and -46%, much larger than the bias observed with SUV(max) (-11% +/- 23%) or with the PVE-corrected SUV based on T(bgd) and Fit (-2% +/- 10% and 3% +/- 24%). The method used to estimate tumor volume and SUV greatly affects the reliability of the estimates. The T(bgd) and Fit methods yielded low errors in volume estimates in a broad range of situations. The PVE-corrected SUV based on T(bgd) and Fit were more accurate and reproducible than SUV(max).
    Journal of Nuclear Medicine 02/2010; 51(2):268-76. · 6.38 Impact Factor
  • Article: Does chemotherapy influence the quantification of SUV when contrast-enhanced CT is used in PET/CT in lymphoma?
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In patients with lymphoma, we investigated the impact of contrast-enhanced CT on PET attenuation correction in lesions and normal tissues, particularly when PET/CT was performed after chemotherapy. Fifty patients (51+/-18 years) with Hodgkin's disease (n=17) or non-Hodgkin lymphomas (n=33) were studied before and after chemotherapy. PET/CT scans were performed 60 min after injection of FDG. Iopamiron 300 (iopamidol, 1.5 cc/kg) was injected immediately afterwards, followed 50 s later by a second craniocaudal CT (CT+). PET images were successively reconstructed using the unenhanced CT (PET-) and the CT+ (PET+) for attenuation correction, using iterative reconstruction (4 iterations, 8 subsets, 5 mm post-filtering). HU(mean), SUV(max) and SUV(mean) were measured before and after chemotherapy in ten non-tumoural ROIs [aorta, femur, kidney, lung, iliopsoas muscle, occipital cortex, T12 vertebra, liver, spleen and inferior vena cava (IVC)] and in tumoural lymphadenopathies or malignant tissues (n=397 and 51 VOIs respectively before and after chemotherapy) using a 3D-thresholding method (identical threshold for PET- and PET+). ROIs were defined on the PET- and automatically applied on the unenhanced CT (CT-), the CT+ and the PET+. In the non-tumoural tissues, HU(mean) increased significantly in the CT+ compared with the CT- in the vessels and the highly vascularised organs, and slight increases were observed in the occipital cortex (+11%), the iliopsoas muscle (+6%) and the femur (+3%). SUV(max) increased significantly in the PET+ compared with the PET- in the aorta (+14%), the liver (+10%), the spleen (+10%) and the IVC (+12%). SUV(mean) increased significantly in the PET+ compared with the PET- in the aorta (+15%), the kidney (+13%), the liver (+11%), the spleen (10%) and the IVC (+12%). In the lesions, HU(mean) was not significantly different before and after chemotherapy, whatever the normal region considered. SUV(max) increased significantly after treatment in the T12 vertebra (+12%). SUV(mean) increased significantly after treatment in the T12 vertebra (+13%) and in the liver (+12%). HU(mean) increased significantly in the CT+ compared with the CT- in the lesions (+55%) before chemotherapy. SUV(max) and SUV(mean) increased significantly in the PET+ compared with the PET- in the lesions (+4%) only before chemotherapy. No significant difference was seen in measurements (HU(mean), SUV(max) and SUV(mean)) after chemotherapy. Our study demonstrates that use of enhanced CT for attenuation correction has a negligible effect on quantification at staging and after chemotherapy. A "single-shot" enhanced PET/CT may thus be performed in the evaluation of patients with lymphoma at staging, during treatment and at follow-up.
    European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 01/2008; 34(12):1943-52. · 4.99 Impact Factor
  • Article: Quantitative accuracy of dopaminergic neurotransmission imaging with (123)I SPECT.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 123I-Labeled radiotracers are suitable for in vivo imaging of the dopaminergic system by SPECT. However, precise measurement of striatal uptake is limited by scatter, attenuation, and the finite spatial resolution of the camera. We studied the quantitative accuracy that can be achieved with (123)I SPECT of the dopaminergic neurotransmission system. Using a Monte Carlo simulation and brain phantom experiments, we studied the biases in brain and striatal absolute uptake estimates and in binding potential (BP) values for different processing schemes with corrections for attenuation, scatter, and the partial-volume effect. Without any correction, brain activity was underestimated by at least 65%, and absolute striatal activity measured in regions corresponding to the anatomic contours of the striata was underestimated by about 90%. With scatter and attenuation corrections only, estimated brain activity was accurate within 10%; however, striatal activity remained underestimated by about 50%, and BP values were underestimated by more than 50%. When combined with attenuation and scatter corrections, anatomically guided partial-volume effect correction (PVC) reduced the biases in striatal activity estimates and in BP values to about 10%. PVC reliability was affected by errors in registering SPECT with anatomic images, in segmenting anatomic images, and in estimating the spatial resolution. With registration errors of 1 voxel (2.1 x 2.1 x 3.6 mm(3)) in all directions and of 15 degrees around the axial direction, PVC still improved the accuracy of striatal activity and BP estimates compared with scatter and attenuation corrections alone, the errors being within 25%. A 50% overestimation of the striatal volume yielded an approximate 30% change in striatal activity estimates with respect to no overestimation but still provided striatal activity estimates that were more accurate than those obtained without PVC (average errors +/- 1 SD were -22.5% +/- 1.0% with PVC and -49.0% +/- 5.5% without PVC). A 2-mm error in the spatial resolution estimate changed the striatal activity and BP estimates by no more than 10%. Accurate estimates of striatal uptake and BP in (123)I brain SPECT are feasible with PVC, even with small errors in registering SPECT with anatomic data or in segmenting the striata.
    Journal of Nuclear Medicine 08/2003; 44(7):1184-93. · 6.38 Impact Factor