Gerasimos Karvountzis

Publications (2)7.28 Total impact

• Article: Safety of extension of a previous endoscopic sphincterotomy: a prospective study.

  Christos Mavrogiannis, Christos Liatsos, Ioannis S Papanikolaou, Dimitris I Psilopoulos, Spyros S Goulas, Andreas Romanos, Gerasimos Karvountzis
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Data in the literature regarding complication risks after the extension of a previous endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (repeat endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy) are limited and controversial. To explore this issue, we prospectively studied complications after repeat sphincterotomy and compared them with those of biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy in consecutive patients with choledocholithiasis. A total of 250 patients underwent endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy and 81 underwent extension of a previous one. All patients had choledocholithiasis and were enrolled using specific criteria, excluding parameters predisposing to increased postsphincterotomy complications. The overall complication rate was 2.46% in the repeat sphincterotomy and 8.4% in the sphincterotomy group (p > 0.05). Complications for the repeat sphincterotomy and initial sphincterotomy groups, respectively, were as follows: bleeding, 2.46% and 2.8%; pancreatitis, 0% and 4.8% (p < 0.05); cholangitis, 0% and 0.4%; perforation, 0% and 0.4%; and hyperamylasemia, 3.7% and 12.8% (p < 0.05). There were no deaths. Bleeding episodes in the former group occurred when repeat sphincterotomy was performed early after the primary one. Repeat sphincterotomy is a safe technique for the treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis and seems to be as safe as initial sphincterotomy. It is not associated with increased hemorrhage risk. There is a trend toward a higher risk of hemorrhage when repeat sphincterotomy is performed early. Repeat sphincterotomy is safer than the initial sphincterotomy with respect to pancreatic complications.
  The American Journal of Gastroenterology 01/2003; 98(1):72-6. · 7.28 Impact Factor
• Article: Sump syndrome: endoscopic treatment and late recurrence

  Christos Mavrogiannis, Christos Liatsos, Andreas Romanos, Spyros Goulas, Spyros Dourakis, Antonios Nakos, Gerasimos Karvountzis
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:Biliary sump syndrome is a rare complication of biliary-enteric anastomosis. Classically, the distal bile duct becomes obstructed by food, stones, or debris after choledochoenterostomy. Endoscopic sphincterotomy has been recommended as the primary and definitive treatment modality. The aim of our study was to confirm the short and long term therapeutic efficacy of endoscopic treatment in a long follow-up period.METHODS:The series include 31 patients with characteristic clinical illness after choledochoduodenostomy. All of them were successfully treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy and bile duct clearance with a balloon catheter or basket. The follow-up period ranged from 18 to 84 months (median: 51 months).RESULTS:Clinical improvement was immediate in all patients. No complications were recorded. Recurrence of the syndrome, with restenosis of the sphincterotomy opening, was observed in six patients (19%) and was treated successfully and safely with a new papillotomy. Sump syndrome recurrence occurred 31–72 months (median: 58.5 months) after the initial treatment.CONCLUSIONS:We report a considerably high recurrence rate of sump syndrome after initially successful endoscopic management and its effective endoscopic treatment with a new papillotomy. We still believe that the primary therapeutic approach in patients with sump syndrome should be endoscopic.
  The American Journal of Gastroenterology.