M C Appleby

World Society for the Protection of Animals, Londinium, England, United Kingdom

Are you M C Appleby?

Claim your profile

Publications (54)60.11 Total impact

  • Michael C Appleby, Tonya Stokes
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Incentives to care for nonhuman animals derive in part from the extent to which people depend on animals for food, for livelihood, and for cultural and psychological reasons as well as from the duty to protect animals in their care. When attention is turned to solving and preventing animal welfare problems at times of crisis, it becomes clear that those problems are also associated with problems for human welfare and environmental impact. The incidence and spread of animal diseases is affected by how animals are treated, and this can have very important effects. Similarly, during disasters caused by either natural or human-made events, outcomes for animals are important both in themselves and for their effects on humans and the environment. The need to plan and prepare to care for animals in advance of disease pandemics and disasters - and then to provide coordinated, measured management in response when such crises occur - requires collaboration between all agencies involved as well as increasing attention and resources.
    Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 01/2008; 11(2):90-7. · 0.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 12/2005; 227(10):1580-90. · 1.72 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Michael C Appleby
    Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 05/2005; 226(8):1334-6. · 1.72 Impact Factor
  • Michael C. Appleby
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Procedures that increase the sustainability of agriculture often result in animals being treated more humanely:both livestock in animal and mixed farming and wildlife in arable farming. Equally, procedures ensuring humane treatment of farm animals often increase sustainability, for example in disease control and manure management. This overlap between sustainability and humaneness is not coincidental. Both approaches can be said to be animal centered, to be based on the fact that animal production is primarily a biological process. Proponents of both will gain from recognition of commonality and development of cooperation. A collaborative approach to humane sustainable agriculture will benefit animals, people, and the environment.
    Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 01/2005; 18(3):293-303. · 1.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Currently not available
    Iowa State University, Department of Economics, Staff General Research Papers. 01/2005;
  • Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association - JAVMA-J AM VET MED ASSOC. 01/2005; 226(8):1324-1344.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper is the report of a meetingthat gathered many of the UK's most senioranimal scientists with representatives of thefarming industry, consumer groups, animalwelfare groups, and environmentalists. Therewas strong consensus that the current economicstructure of agriculture cannot adequatelyaddress major issues of concern to society:farm incomes, food security and safety, theneeds of developing countries, animal welfare,and the environment. This economic structure isbased primarily on competition betweenproducers and between retailers, driving foodprices down, combined with externalization ofmany costs. These issues must be addressed by acombination of legislation, restructuring ofthe market, and use of public funds. Themeeting included workshops that made otherrecommendations for research and education. Themost urgent requirement is recognition thatchange is needed and development of a visionfor what that change must achieve.
    Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 06/2003; 16(4):395-408. · 1.30 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Michael C Appleby
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since the publication of Animal Machines (Harrison, 1964), there has been widespread public pressure in Europe--supported by European institutions--to "ban the battery cage." The European Union (EU) and national governments (particularly in Northern Europe) funded research on noncage systems for egg production and enriched cages. In 1986, the EU passed a Directive specifying a minimum size for cages, but public opinion--again particularly in the North--continued to require more. A market sector emerged that would pay more for noncage eggs. Denmark, Sweden, and Switzerland passed more stringent legislation than the rest of Europe. A 1999 Directive with details based on advice from the EU's Scientific Veterinary Committee will phase out conventional laying cages but allow enriched cages. Implementation depends on various factors, including negotiations in the World Trade Organization. In the next 10 years, however, major changes to the housing of most laying hens in Europe almost certainly will occur. Similar changes in other countries will follow. As in Europe, change probably will be piecemeal, affected both by public pressure and by all sectors of society: producers, retailers, consumers, legislators, and the media.
    Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 02/2003; 6(2):103-21. · 0.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Michael C. Appleby
    01/2003;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 1. A 3-year trial was carried out of cages for laying hens, occupying a full laying house. The main cage designs used were 5000 cm2 in area, 50 cm high at the rear and furnished with nests and perches. F cages had a front rollaway nest at the side, lined with artificial turf. FD cages also had a dust bath containing sand over the nest. H cages had two nest hollows at the side, one in front of the other. They were compared with conventional cages 2500 cm2 in area and 38 cm high at the rear. 2. Cages were stocked with from 4 to 8 ISA Brown hens per cage, resulting in varied allowances of area, feeder and perch per bird. No birds were beak trimmed. In F and FD cages two further treatments were applied: nests and dust baths were sometimes fitted with gates to exclude birds from dust baths in the morning and from both at night; elevated food troughs, with a lip 33 cm above the cage floor, were compared with standard troughs. 3. Management of the house was generally highly successful, with temperature control achieved by ventilation. Egg production was above breeders' standards and not significantly affected by cage design. More eggs per bird were collected when there were fewer birds per cage but food consumption also then tended to be higher. 4. The number of downgraded eggs was variable, with some tendency for more in furnished cages. Eggs laid in dust baths were often downgraded. Those laid at the back of the cage were frequently dirty because of accumulation of droppings. H nests were unsuccessful, with less than 50% of eggs laid in the nest hollows. However, up to 93% of eggs were laid in front rollaways, and few of these were downgraded. 5. Feather and foot damage were generally less in furnished than in conventional cages, greater where there were more birds per cage. With an elevated food trough there was less feather damage but more overgrowth of claws. In year 2, mortality was greater in cages with more birds. 6. Pre-laying behaviour was mostly settled in front rollaway nests. Dust baths were used more for pecking and scratching than for dust bathing. Comfort behaviour was more frequent in furnished cages than conventional, although still not frequent. Locomotion was strongly affected by number of birds per cage or by space per bird, being reduced by crowding. Most birds perched at night except in one treatment providing only 10.7 cm perch per bird. 7. Behaviour was more unrestricted and varied, and physical condition was better, in furnished than in conventional cages. However, egg production will cost more in furnished cages, partly because more eggs are downgraded. Dust baths must be fitted with gates that the birds cannot open from outside, but gates for nest boxes were found unnecessary. If a low perch is fitted it must be far enough from the back of the cage for birds to walk there. 8. Where there was less space per bird (more birds per cage) than the requirements in the 1999 European Commission Directive on laying hens, there were: fewer eggs per hen, but still above the breeders' target; lower food consumption; more feather and foot damage, but less than in conventional cages; higher mortality in one trial out of three; less freedom of movement. However, the results were still very good even with 8 birds per cage, and support the principle that furnished cages provide an acceptable way of protecting the welfare of laying hens.
    British Poultry Science 10/2002; 43(4):489-500. · 1.15 Impact Factor
  • T J Thomas, D M Weary, M C Appleby
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dairy calves are commonly vocal after separation from the cow and during the following weeks while they are fed milk. This study examined the functional and motivational basis for such vocalizations. In one experiment, we found that 14 newborn calves called on average (±S.E.M.) 31.4 (±7.0) times per day when fed according to conventional management (i.e. twice daily for a total of 5l during 24h). In contrast, when calves were fed every 4h and received 8l of milk per day they called only 5.0 (±3.4) times over that period. Calls were also higher in fundamental frequency when calves were fed conventionally than when fed more milk, more often (120.6±2.2 versus 109.0±3.1Hz). In a second experiment, we found that 19 five-week-old calves deprived of milk called on average 9.9 (±2.1) times during a 3h period compared to 0.3 (±0.5) times when they had ad libitum access to milk. These results indicate that the vocalizations of milk-fed calves are related to milk feeding practices and that vocal behaviour may be useful in developing methods of separation and weaning that are less distressing for the calf. Analysis of call duration, fundamental frequency and frequency of maximum amplitude indicated that calls of calves in both experiments were individually distinctive, providing a potential basis for recognition of calves by cows.
    Applied Animal Behaviour Science 01/2001; 74(3):165-173. · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • M C Appleby, D M Weary, B Chua
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Weight gain, milk intake, starter intake and number of days with diarrhoea were measured for individually housed Holstein calves offered milk twice daily by bucket at 5% of body weight per feeding (n=11) or ad libitum from a teat (n=12) from birth until 4 weeks of age. Mean weight gains during the first 2 weeks were 0.36 and 0.85kg/day and during the next 2 weeks were 0.58 and 0.79kg/day respectively. These differences were probably the result of higher milk consumption by teat-fed versus bucket-fed calves, which occurred in all 4 weeks. Starter consumption was negligible until 3 weeks of age for both groups, but the bucket-fed calves consumed more than teat-fed calves (0.25 versus 0.11kg/day) during week 4. Milk drinking behaviour was studied in detail for eight teat-fed calves over 24h. Total feeding time was 47min. All individuals took their largest meals after new milk was provided in the morning (4.7kg at 6.4g/s) and after milk was added in the afternoon (3.2kg at 5.0g/s); 74% of total daily intake was consumed in these two meals. Calves that drank more also drank faster (r=0.78 for morning meals, 0.90 for afternoon meals). Intake rate varied little over the course of large meals, although it tended to decelerate towards the end of the meal. Calves consumed the first meal of the day in 13min, during which they were attached to the teat for 80% of the time. These meals comprised, on average, 25 individual sucking events of 25s duration, interspersed by gaps of 7s. Calves occasionally butted the teat, normally during the middle of the meal, and the frequency of butting correlated positively with intake rate (r=0.80). Feeding calves ad libitum from teats allows them to determine their own intake patterns while improving performance compared to conventional bucket feeding.
    Applied Animal Behaviour Science 01/2001; 74(3):191-201. · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Vocalizations during competition among nursing piglets were studied to investigate their possible effects, functions and implications for welfare. In Expt 1, two experimental piglets in each of 14 litters were temporarily deprived of milk by covering their preferred teats on the sow’s udder. These piglets spent more time away from their teats than two control piglets, and vocalized frequently in the 2 min before milk ejection. Frequency of vocalization showed no consistent change over time within nursings; nor did it change in successive nursings despite the fact that hunger presumably increased. In Expt 2, tape recordings of intense vocalizations (screams) produced by piglets competing at the udder were played to 22 litters while they were nursing; each litter was played its own recording, a recording from another litter and silence as a control. Of 51 nursings analysed, 14 were terminated without milk ejection, all during playbacks. When the sow did nurse successfully during a playback, nursing was shorter (138 s) than during the silent controls (179 s). Both these responses by the sow might be expected to advance the next nursing. Piglets rarely showed any apparent response to screaming either from their littermates or from the loudspeaker. These results suggest that the calls function mainly as a signal to the sow that some piglets are being excluded from the current nursing episode.
    Ethology 09/1999; 105(10):881 - 892. · 1.95 Impact Factor
  • D M Weary, M C Appleby, D Fraser
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two experiments examined the effect of age and diet on behavioural responses of piglets to separation from the sow. In Experiment 1, the vocalizations of piglets were recorded during short term (10 min) isolation from the sow and litter-mates at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks of age. From each of 10 litters, two piglets were assigned to each of the four age groups. Piglets of all ages vocalized intensely during isolation, but call rate was lower with older piglets, especially for high-frequency calls (>500 Hz). When returned to the sow, piglets made distinctive `quacking' vocalizations, and older piglets produced fewer of these calls than younger piglets. Experiment 2 involved two treatments: weaning age and diet quality. Piglets were weaned at either 2 weeks of age and onto a diet formulated for piglets of this age, or at 4 weeks of age and fed either a diet typically provided for piglets of this age or a more palatable and nutritionally complex diet. Three piglets from each of 16 litters were assigned to each of the three treatment groups. We monitored vocalizations over the first 3 days after weaning, and measured the incidence of belly-nosing during the subsequent week. Piglets weaned onto the standard diet at 4 weeks produced high-frequency calls (>500 Hz) at a significantly higher rate than those weaned onto the more complex diet, but there was no effect of diet on the incidence of belly-nosing. Piglets weaned at 2 weeks produced more high-frequency calls and performed more belly-nosing than piglets weaned at 4 weeks onto either diet. Thus the behavioural response to separation is greater at younger ages both when the period of separation is too short for diet to be a factor (Experiment 1) and when younger piglets are provided with a specialized diet that allows them to achieve acceptable weight gain after weaning (Experiment 2). These results indicate that separation distress and frustration of suckling motivation are significant problems when piglets are weaned at less than 4 weeks of age.
    Applied Animal Behaviour Science 01/1999; 63(4):289-300. · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    M C Appleby
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although they have many disadvantages for welfare, including for behavior, laying hen cages also have advantages. For example, aggression and cannibalism (or the need for beak trimming to prevent these) are usually less than in other systems, benefiting both the birds and the producer. There have been three approaches to reducing other behavioral problems. First, the design of conventional cages has been improved, which has had favorable effects on some aspects of behavior, such as feeding. Second, cages for larger groups of birds have been tested; for example, the getaway cage has increased behavioral freedom but has also increased problems such as aggression and cannibalism. Third, novel cages have been designed for conventional group sizes. Many of the behavioral problems-for producers, birds, or both--occurring in conventional cages can be reduced or prevented by increasing cage area (including width) and height and by providing a nest box, dust bath, and perch. Some of these modifications could be implemented at negligible cost to the producer. Others will be commercially viable if premium prices are available for eggs or if legislation on housing of laying hens changes.
    Poultry Science 01/1999; 77(12):1828-32. · 1.52 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 1. Three experiments were carried out with ISA Brown laying hens housed in individual cages with softwood perches of rectangular cross section fitted across the width of each cage, to investigate factors affecting the tendency of hens to lay their eggs from the perches and to use perches at other times. These factors were perch width and angle and method of perch introduction. 2. In experiment 1 there were 4 treatments. Perches were 38 or 60 mm wide; half of each width were flat and half were fixed at 8 degrees, parallel to the slope of the floor. In 2 similar trials (with 48 and 44 birds respectively, equally divided between treatments) birds were moved to experimental cages already fitted with perches. Birds with 38 mm, sloping perches laid less than one third of their eggs from the perch (31% and 9% in the two trials) while those with the other designs laid more than 80% from the perch. Narrow sloping perches were not otherwise aversive and there was no consistent variation between treatments in total time perching. 3. In experiment 2, 32 birds were allowed to start laying on the floor of the experimental cages then perches were introduced at 24 weeks with 8 birds on each of 4 treatments: 50 mm perches fixed flat and 38 mm perches fixed flat, and at 5 and 10 degrees respectively. Only 27% of eggs were laid from the perches with no variation between treatments either in this behaviour or in total time perching. 4. Experiment 3 provided 24 of the birds from experiment 2 with double-length perches to determine whether they showed preferences for the design features under consideration. Either half the perch length was flat and half sloping at 10 degrees or half was 38 and half 50 mm wide. Again a relatively low proportion of eggs was laid from the perches (18%) and birds showed no significant preference for different perch designs as indicated by either how much they perched or where they perched. 5. These results suggest that both perch design and the way pullets are introduced to perches influence the proportion of perch-laid eggs. They confirm that in some circumstances laying from perches can be a serious problem, but that in other circumstances incidence can be reduced to a manageable frequency. Perches may therefore be practical in commercial production without increasing the number of cracked eggs. The results are also likely to be applicable in cages with other facilities including nest boxes.
    British Poultry Science 06/1998; 39(2):186-90. · 1.15 Impact Factor
  • Rafael Freire, Michael C. Appleby, Barry O. Hughes
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aims of this study were to investigate the effects of social interactions on access to the nest site and pre-laying behaviour of hens in small groups. Nine groups of four hens were placed in a littered round pen. Aggressive pecks, together with the identity of the individuals involved, were recorded for 8 h of the day. Behaviour in the hour prior to oviposition was also recorded at 15 s intervals using a video camera and VCR. Records of pre-laying behaviour were divided into three categories: (1) dominant category, for hens whose pre-laying behaviour overlapped with that of subordinate pen-mates; (2) subordinate category, for hens whose pre-laying behaviour overlapped with that of dominant pen-mates; and (3) undisturbed category, for hens that showed pre-laying behaviour when no other hens were showing it. Dominant hens showed a pre-oviposition increase (median) interquartile range 13.0 (3.0–30.0)) in the number of pecks given in the hour before oviposition when compared to the hour after (1.0 (0.0–10.0), P < 0.05). Subordinate hens however, received more aggressive pecks in the hour before oviposition (21.5 (10.0–37.0)) than in the hour after (0.0 (0.0–5.0), P < 0.05). Undisturbed hens showed no changes in aggressive pecks either received or given between pre and post-oviposition time periods. Subordinate hens were also displaced more times from the nest (7.0 (4.3–12.5)) in the 30 min prior to oviposition than undisturbed hens (1.5 (0.8-2.3), P < 0.05). In the period 60-25 min before oviposition, subordinate hens walked more (163.5 (112.5–174.7) steps) than dominant (85.0 (43.0–221.5)) and undisturbed hens (59.0 (18.5–74.5)), P < 0.05). Subordinate hens also walked more (113.5 (50.3–281.2) steps) than dominant (14.0 (9.0–15.0)) and undisturbed hens (43.0 (20.0–59.5), P < 0.05) in the last 25 min before oviposition. For this time period, differences in the time spent sitting were also observed (subordinate 10.0 (4.1–14.6), dominant 19.3 (12.6–20.9) and undisturbed 13.8 (10.5–18.9) min, P < 0.05). Results suggested that hens compete for access to the nest site. Variations in pre-laying behaviour owing to social interactions were observed in both directions: subordinate hens showed an increased searching phase, whereas dominant hens remained nearer the nest site.
    Applied Animal Behaviour Science - APPL ANIM BEHAV SCI. 01/1998; 56(1):47-57.
  • JJ Cooper, MC Appleby
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Laying hens, Gallus gallus domesticusshow individual variation in pre-laying behaviour including their ultimate choice of nest site. In housing systems with nestboxes, the majority of hens make a small number of long visits to nestboxes and lay their eggs therein, but some hens make many short visits and occasionally lay outside the nestbox. We investigated the motivational basis of this individual variation using six consistent hens which always laid in nestboxes and six inconsistent hens which sometimes laid outside nestboxes. Each hen was housed in a pen (containing either no nestbox, a semi-enclosed nestbox or an enclosed nestbox) with access to a ring-shaped tunnel which increased the opportunity to perform locomotor activity. Access to the tunnel could be restricted by narrowing the doorway to 140, 125, 110 or 95 mm (compared with a mean hen width of 114 mm). In trials with no nestbox, there was no difference in the pre-laying behaviour of consistent and inconsistent hens. Narrowing the doorway reduced the number of visits to the tunnel, but all hens persisted in visiting the tunnel and doorwidth had no effect on time spent therein. With both designs of nestbox, however, inconsistent hens visited the tunnel more often than consistent hens prior to oviposition, and continued to pass the narrowest doors to enter the tunnel, whilst consistent hens would not pass doors of 110 or 95 mm. After oviposition, there was no difference in the two groups' behaviour in any treatment and no hens would pass doors of either 110 or 95 mm to visit the tunnel. Individual variation in nest-site choice, therefore, appeared to result from different perception of nestboxes rather than lower nesting motivation. Inconsistent hens worked as hard as consistent hens to perform pre-laying locomotion, but appeared to be less responsive to the cues provided by nestboxes than consistent hens, because they persisted with pre-laying locomotion when provided with either design of nestbox.Copyright 1997 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour1997The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour
    Animal Behaviour 12/1997; 54(5):1245-53. · 3.07 Impact Factor
  • R Freire, MC Appleby, BO Hughes
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While much is known about the hormonal basis of pre-laying behaviour of domestic hens, Gallus gallus domesticuslittle is known about how the behaviour is initiated or how changes in this behaviour occur. An experiment was conducted in which hens had to overcome an aversive task, during the course of pre-laying behaviour, in order to reach a nest site. Twelve hens were tested in four treatments presented as a Latin square design. The test arena was arranged such that hens could approach the nestbox only along one corridor, and return to the home pen by another. The four treatments consisted of leaving the corridor leading to the nestbox empty, or placing a hen that was dominant, subordinate or unfamiliar to the test-bird in it. Hens took longer to enter the corridor leading to the nestbox when there was a dominant or unfamiliar stimulus-bird than with a subordinate or an empty corridor. They also made more attempts to find alternative routes to the nestbox during the searching phase of pre-laying behaviour when there was a dominant or unfamiliar stimulus-bird, than with a subordinate stimulus-bird or empty pen and made fewer entries into the corridor with an unfamiliar stimulus-bird, but not a dominant or subordinate stimulus-bird or an empty pen. We suggest that hens are weakly motivated to reach the nest site during the searching phase. However, the motivation to gain access to a nest site increases near the start of the sitting phase of pre-laying behaviour.
    Animal Behaviour 09/1997; 54(2):313-9. · 3.07 Impact Factor
  • Michael C. Appleby
    Applied Animal Behaviour Science 08/1997; 54(1):71–72. · 1.50 Impact Factor

Publication Stats

800 Citations
60.11 Total Impact Points

Institutions

  • 2008
    • World Society for the Protection of Animals
      Londinium, England, United Kingdom
  • 2003
    • James Hutton Institute
      Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom
  • 1991–2002
    • The University of Edinburgh
      Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
  • 2001
    • Higher School of Agriculture of Angers
      Angers, Pays de la Loire, France
  • 1999
    • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
      Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • 1996
    • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
      • Institutionen för husdjurens utfodring och vård
      Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden