Publications (3)3.56 Total impact
-
Article: Assessment of fetal lung development by quantitative ultrasonic tissue characterization: a methodical study.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study was performed to evaluate the quantitative ultrasonic tissue characterization of the normal fetal lung development by using acoustic raw data captured after preprocessing. One hundred and sixty-two patients with completed gestational ages between 22 and 37 weeks were enrolled in this study. Longitudinal and transverse sections of the fetal thorax and upper abdomen were imaged. A region of interest of constant size was defined and the tissue-specific gray scale was determined by using an interactive software. A total of 162 patients met the inclusion criteria. The echogenicity of the fetal lung showed a particular changing pattern during pregnancy: the mean gray value of the fetal lung (MGV) is almost the same as the MGV of the fetal liver at 22 and 23 weeks, decreases between 22 and 31 weeks and increases between 31 and 37 weeks. The MGV of the fetal liver decreases significantly from 24 weeks to 31 weeks and increases significantly again toward 37 weeks. We stated that the MGV of the lung is smaller than the MGV of the liver during 31 weeks of gestation and the relation reverses in late gestation. At term, the MGV of the liver is greater than the MGV of the lung. The lung-to-liver ratio is <1 between 24 and 29 weeks and >1 between 30 and 35 weeks. The echogenicity of the fetal lung showed a particular changing pattern during pregnancy, which corresponds to morphologic changes of the fetal lung development.Prenatal Diagnosis 10/2004; 24(9):671-6. · 2.11 Impact Factor -
Article: Giant hydronephrosis mimicking progressive malignancy.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Cases of giant hydronephroses are rare and usually contain no more than 1-2 litres of fluid in the collecting system. We report a remarkable case of giant hydronephrosis mimicking a progressive malignant abdominal tumour. A 78-year-old cachectic woman presented with an enormous abdominal tumour, which, according to the patient, had slowly increased in diameter. Medical history was unremarkable except for a hysterectomy >30 years before. A CT scan revealed a giant cystic tumour filling almost the entire abdominal cavity. It was analysed by two independent radiologists who suspected a tumour originating from the right kidney and additionally a cystic ovarian neoplasm. Subsequently, a diagnostic and therapeutic laparotomy was performed: the tumour presented as a cystic, 35 x 30 x 25 cm expansive structure adhesive to adjacent organs without definite signs of invasive growth. The right renal hilar vessels could finally be identified at its basis. After extirpation another tumourous structure emerged in the pelvis originating from the genital organs and was also resected. The histopathological examination revealed a >15 kg hydronephrotic right kidney, lacking hardly any residual renal cortex parenchyma. The second specimen was identified as an ovary with regressive changes and a large partially calcified cyst. There was no evidence of malignant growth. Although both clinical symptoms and the enormous size of the tumour indicated malignant growth, it turned out to be a giant hydronephrosis. Presumably, a chronic obstruction of the distal ureter had caused this extraordinary hydronephrosis. As demonstrated in our case, an accurate diagnosis of giant hydronephrosis remains challenging due to the atrophy of the renal parenchyma associated with chronic obstruction. Therefore, any abdominal cystic mass even in the absence of other evident pathologies should include the differential diagnosis of a possible hydronephrosis. Diagnostic accuracy might be increased by a combination of endourological techniques such as retrograde pyelography and modern imaging modalities.BMC Urology 10/2003; 3:4. · 1.45 Impact Factor -
Article: Giant hydronephrosis mimicking progressive malignancy
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Abstract Background Cases of giant hydronephroses are rare and usually contain no more than 1–2 litres of fluid in the collecting system. We report a remarkable case of giant hydronephrosis mimicking a progressive malignant abdominal tumour. Case presentation A 78-year-old cachectic woman presented with an enormous abdominal tumour, which, according to the patient, had slowly increased in diameter. Medical history was unremarkable except for a hysterectomy >30 years before. A CT scan revealed a giant cystic tumour filling almost the entire abdominal cavity. It was analysed by two independent radiologists who suspected a tumour originating from the right kidney and additionally a cystic ovarian neoplasm. Subsequently, a diagnostic and therapeutic laparotomy was performed: the tumour presented as a cystic, 35 × 30 × 25 cm expansive structure adhesive to adjacent organs without definite signs of invasive growth. The right renal hilar vessels could finally be identified at its basis. After extirpation another tumourous structure emerged in the pelvis originating from the genital organs and was also resected. The histopathological examination revealed a >15 kg hydronephrotic right kidney, lacking hardly any residual renal cortex parenchyma. The second specimen was identified as an ovary with regressive changes and a large partially calcified cyst. There was no evidence of malignant growth. Conclusion Although both clinical symptoms and the enormous size of the tumour indicated malignant growth, it turned out to be a giant hydronephrosis. Presumably, a chronic obstruction of the distal ureter had caused this extraordinary hydronephrosis. As demonstrated in our case, an accurate diagnosis of giant hydronephrosis remains challenging due to the atrophy of the renal parenchyma associated with chronic obstruction. Therefore, any abdominal cystic mass even in the absence of other evident pathologies should include the differential diagnosis of a possible hydronephrosis. Diagnostic accuracy might be increased by a combination of endourological techniques such as retrograde pyelography and modern imaging modalities.BMC Urology. 01/2003;