Article

Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on time to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or death using marginal structural models.

Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
American Journal of Epidemiology (Impact Factor: 4.98). 11/2003; 158(7):687-94.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To estimate the net (i.e., overall) effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on time to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or death, the authors used inverse probability-of-treatment weighted estimation of a marginal structural model, which can appropriately adjust for time-varying confounders affected by prior treatment or exposure. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive men and women (n = 1,498) were followed in two ongoing cohort studies between 1995 and 2002. Sixty-one percent (n = 918) of the participants initiated HAART during 6,763 person-years of follow-up, and 382 developed AIDS or died. Strong confounding by indication for HAART was apparent; the unadjusted hazard ratio for AIDS or death was 0.98. The hazard ratio from a standard time-dependent Cox model that included time-varying CD4 cell count, HIV RNA level, and other time-varying and fixed covariates as regressors was 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.61, 1.07). In contrast, the hazard ratio from a marginal structural survival model was 0.54 (robust 95% confidence interval: 0.38, 0.78), suggesting a clinically meaningful net benefit of HAART. Standard Cox analysis failed to detect a clear net benefit, because it does not appropriately adjust for time-dependent covariates, such as HIV RNA level and CD4 cell count, that are simultaneously confounders and intermediate variables.

2 Followers
 · 
82 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The parametric g-formula can be used to estimate the effect of a policy, intervention, or treatment. Unlike standard regression approaches, the parametric g-formula can be used to adjust for time-varying confounders that are affected by prior exposures. To date, there are few published examples in which the method has been applied. Methods: We provide a simple introduction to the parametric g-formula and illustrate its application in an analysis of a small cohort study of bone marrow transplant patients in which the effect of treatment on mortality is subject to time-varying confounding. Results: Standard regression adjustment yields a biased estimate of the effect of treatment on mortality relative to the estimate obtained by the g-formula. Conclusions: The g-formula allows estimation of a relevant parameter for public health officials: the change in the hazard of mortality under a hypothetical intervention, such as reduction of exposure to a harmful agent or introduction of a beneficial new treatment. We present a simple approach to implement the parametric g-formula that is sufficiently general to allow easy adaptation to many settings of public health relevance.
    Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) 08/2014; 25(6). DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000000160 · 6.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Longitudinal observational data are required to assess the association between exposure to β-interferon medications and disease progression among relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in the "real-world" clinical practice setting. Marginal structural Cox models (MSCMs) can provide distinct advantages over traditional approaches by allowing adjustment for time-varying confounders such as MS relapses, as well as baseline characteristics, through the use of inverse probability weighting. We assessed the suitability of MSCMs to analyze data from a large cohort of 1,697 relapsing-remitting MS patients in British Columbia, Canada (1995-2008). In the context of this observational study, which spanned more than a decade and involved patients with a chronic yet fluctuating disease, the recently proposed "normalized stabilized" weights were found to be the most appropriate choice of weights. Using this model, no association between β-interferon exposure and the hazard of disability progression was found (hazard ratio = 1.36, 95% confidence interval: 0.95, 1.94). For sensitivity analyses, truncated normalized unstabilized weights were used in additional MSCMs and to construct inverse probability weight-adjusted survival curves; the findings did not change. Additionally, qualitatively similar conclusions from approximation approaches to the weighted Cox model (i.e., MSCM) extend confidence in the findings.
    American Journal of Epidemiology 06/2014; 180(2). DOI:10.1093/aje/kwu125 · 4.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This book is, as the title indicates, about regression methods, with examples and terminology from the biostatistics field. It should, however, also be useful for practitioners from other disciplines where regression methods can be applied. A prerequisite for the book is a first course in statistics, including simple linear regression, one-way ANOVA, and the chi-square test for independence in contingency tables. After a motivating introductory example in Chapter 1, the authors continue in Chapter 2 with a presentation of descriptive and graphical methods for different kinds of variables, e.g., the histogram, the boxplot, and the qq-plot, along with ordinary numerical summary statistics for numerical variables, tables for categorical variables, and scatterplots, correlation coefficients, and crosstabulation for the relation between two variables. In Chapter 3, “Basic Statistical Methods”, the above mentioned prerequisites are reviewed, i.e., the t-test, analysis of variance, correlation, simple linear regression, methods for binary outcomes, survival analysis, and bootstrap confidence intervals. In Chapter 4, multipredictor methods are introduced in the context of the basic linear regression model. This chapter also covers the general topics confounding, mediation, interaction, and model checking. Chapter 5 deals with predictor selection, Chapter 6 with binary outcomes and logistic regression, and Chapter 7 with survival analysis. In Chapter 8, dependence is introduced in the form of repeated measurements, and its various forms are discussed in sections about hierarcical data, longitudinal data, generalized estimating equations, and random effects models. Chapter 9 returns to independence and introduces the generalized linear models. Finally, Chapter 10 introduces briefly the concept of analysis of complex surveys. The book concludes with a summary in Chapter 11, where the authors try to give practical advises about which of the methods covered in this book should be used in a particular situation, and also under what circumstances none is suitable. Most chapters end with a Problems section, and a section of further notes and references, making the book suitable as a text for a course on regression methods for Ph. D. students in medicine, but also in other appplied fields, e.g., in the social sciences. Many of the analyses in the book are illustrated with output from the statistical package Stata.Reviewer: Göran Broström (Umea)