Article

Premonitory sensory phenomena and suppressibility of tics in Tourette syndrome: developmental aspects in children and adolescents.

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (Impact Factor: 3.29). 11/2003; 45(10):700-3. DOI: 10.1017/S0012162203001294
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although premonitory sensory phenomena (PSP) and suppressibility of tics (SPT) are important in Tourette syndrome not only when behavioural therapeutic approaches in children are considered, there is a lack of developmental information on these phenomena. Therefore, a cross-sectional survey of these factors in children and adolescents was carried out. Rates of PSP and SPT were gathered using a questionnaire for the assessment of Tourette syndrome. The 254 outpatients (212 males, 42 females) with Tourette syndrome investigated had an age range of 8 to 19 years, normal intelligence, and diagnosis according to DSM-IV-TR/ICD-10. To test for developmental effects, the total group was stratified into three age groups (8 to 10, 11 to 14, and 15 to 19 years). Data were statistically evaluated using chi2 tests. Of the 254 participants, 37% reported PSP, while 64% were able to suppress their tics. Only a subgroup of 119 patients gave unequivocal answers to both questions and only 60% of these experienced both PSP and SPT. Statistically significant stepwise increases were found at two different age levels. One was around 10 years (PSP 'Yes' or 'No' and SPT), the other around age 14 (PSP 'Yes'). There was no influence of tic duration and age at tic onset on PSP/SPT. The reported data suggest that PSP is experienced rarely in younger children with Tourette syndrome and is not a necessary prerequisite for SPT. Increasing PSP with age merely seems to reflect cognitive development rather than intrinsic aspects of Tourette syndrome. In children under 10 years of age, SPT might require more awareness of tics than in older age groups. Developmental aspects of PSP and SPT should be taken into consideration when studies of cognitive behavioural treatment for children and adolescents with Tourette syndrome are planned.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
51 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sensory phenomena (SP) are disturbing sensations, feelings or urges. Although such feelings are often found in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and Tourette's Syndrome (TS) patients, sensory phenomena are usually not addressed in assessment measures. The University of São Paulo's Sensory Phenomena Scale (USP-SPS) was designed to measure sensory phenomena among all ages of patients with OCD and TS, and it was validated in Portuguese. The aim of this study is to validate the English version of the USP-SPS and to examine its psychometric properties. Sixty subjects, between the ages of 7 and 60years, completed the USP-SPS, Y-BOCS or CY-BOCS and YGTSS. An expert clinician also performed a Clinical Inquiry about SP. Inter-rater reliability, sensitivity, specificity, convergent and divergent validity were evaluated. The USP-SPS symptom checklist showed good sensitivity in all ages, however its severity scale did not show good validity results for the pediatric population.
    Comprehensive psychiatry 02/2014; · 2.08 Impact Factor
  • The primary care companion to CNS disorders. 02/2014; 16(1).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective While in clinical interviews the vast majority of patients with Tourette syndrome (TS) report about a tic rebound after voluntary tic suppression, in recent studies in children no paradoxical tic increase could be found. We hypothesized that in adult patients there is a tic rebound after voluntary tic suppression. Methods We investigated tic severity, premonitory urges and the influence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) before, during and after tic suppression in 22 adult patients with TS using both an objective video tic rating and subjective patients ratings for tics and premonitory urges. Results According to the video rating, tic suppression resulted in a significant tic reduction, but no rebound. Patients also reported no tic rebound. They erroneously believed in an absolute tic reduction 20 and 30 minutes after suppression, but paradoxically felt no relative tic change. Premonitory urges remained unchanged. There was no correlation between premonitory urges and tic severity. The potency for tic inhibition did not correlate with premonitory urges and tic severity. ADHD did not influence tic inhibition. Conclusion In adults with TS, there is no tic rebound after voluntary tic suppression. Patients also reported no rebound, but erroneously felt a tic reduction in the later cause of the study. This misjudgement as well as patients’ often reported (mis-)belief of a tic rebound may be caused by overall difficulties in reliable tic rating. Premonitory urges remained unchanged during tic suppression. Tic suppression was not influenced by attention deficits. Premonitory urges are no prerequisite of tic suppression.
    Journal of Psychosomatic Research 06/2014; · 2.84 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
0 Downloads