Article

The retrieval function of the KDEL receptor requires PKA phosphorylation of its C-terminus

Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biology, University of Seville, 41012 Seville, Spain.
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Impact Factor: 4.55). 11/2003; 14(10):4114-25. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E03-04-0194
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The KDEL receptor is a Golgi/intermediate compartment-located integral membrane protein that carries out the retrieval of escaped ER proteins bearing a C-terminal KDEL sequence. This occurs throughout retrograde traffic mediated by COPI-coated transport carriers. The role of the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of the KDEL receptor in this process has been investigated. Deletion of this domain did not affect receptor subcellular localization although cells expressing this truncated form of the receptor failed to retain KDEL ligands intracellularly. Permeabilized cells incubated with ATP and GTP exhibited tubular processes-mediated redistribution from the Golgi area to the ER of the wild-type receptor, whereas the truncated form lacking the C-terminal domain remained concentrated in the Golgi. As revealed with a peptide-binding assay, this domain did not interact with both coatomer and ARF-GAP unless serine 209 was mutated to aspartic acid. In contrast, alanine replacement of serine 209 inhibited coatomer/ARF-GAP recruitment, receptor redistribution into the ER, and intracellular retention of KDEL ligands. Serine 209 was phosphorylated by both cytosolic and recombinant protein kinase A (PKA) catalytic subunit. Inhibition of endogenous PKA activity with H89 blocked Golgi-ER transport of the native receptor but did not affect redistribution to the ER of a mutated form bearing aspartic acid at position 209. We conclude that PKA phosphorylation of serine 209 is required for the retrograde transport of the KDEL receptor from the Golgi complex to the ER from which the retrieval of proteins bearing the KDEL signal depends.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Manuel Muñiz, Sep 03, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
157 Views
 · 
43 Downloads
  • Source
    • "Indeed, our identification of null mutations in the single Drosophila KdelR will allow for more direct tests for a role for the KdelR in inducing autophagy in neurodegenerative disease models [39] and in regulating cargo flux through the Golgi [40]. The null mutations can also be used to clarify the importance of post-translational modifications on Kdel-R localization and activity [41]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Core components of the secretory pathway have largely been identified and studied in single cell systems such as the budding yeast S. cerevisiae or in mammalian tissue culture. These studies provide details on the molecular functions of the secretory machinery; they fail, however, to provide insight into the role of these proteins in the context of specialized organs of higher eukaryotes. Here, we identify and characterize the first loss-of-function mutations in a KDEL receptor gene from higher eukaryotes. Transcripts from the Drosophila KDEL receptor gene KdelR - formerly known as dmErd2 - are provided maternally and, at later stages, are at elevated levels in several embryonic cell types, including the salivary gland secretory cells, the fat body and the epidermis. We show that, unlike Saccharomyces cerevisiae Erd2 mutants, which are viable, KdelR mutations are early larval lethal, with homozygous mutant animals dying as first instar larvae. KdelR mutants have larval cuticle defects similar to those observed with loss-of-function mutations in other core secretory pathway genes and with mutations in CrebA, which encodes a bZip transcription factor that coordinately upregulates secretory pathway component genes in specialized secretory cell types. Using the salivary gland, we demonstrate a requirement for KdelR in maintaining the ER pool of a subset of soluble resident ER proteins. These studies underscore the utility of the Drosophila salivary gland as a unique system for studying the molecular machinery of the secretory pathway in vivo in a complex eukaryote.
    PLoS ONE 10/2013; 8(10):e77618. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0077618 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Following an increase in the intracellular levels of cAMP, the ARF proteins redistribute from the cytosol to the Golgi complex in intact cells (Martin et al. 2000). Protein kinase A also phosphorylates a COPI-binding motif on the C-terminal tail of the KDELR, which is necessary for retrograde transport of the KDELR itself (Cabrera et al. 2003) in its control of the recycling of important ER-resident proteins (e.g. ER chaperones) (Pelham 1991). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intracellular membrane transport involves the well-coordinated engagement of a series of organelles and molecular machineries that ensure that proteins are delivered to their correct cellular locations according to their function. To maintain the homeostasis of the secretory system, the fluxes of membranes and protein across the transport compartments must be precisely balanced. This control should rely on a mechanism that senses the movement of the traffic and generates the required homeostatic response. Due to its central position in the secretory pathway and to the large amounts of signaling molecules associated with it, the Golgi complex represents the ideal candidate for this regulation. The generation of autonomous signaling by the Golgi complex in response to the arrival of cargo from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) has been experimentally addressed only in recent years. These studies have revealed that cargo moving from the ER to the Golgi activates a series of signaling pathways, the functional significance of which appears to be to maintain the homeostasis of the Golgi complex and to activate Golgi trafficking according to internal demand. We have termed this regulatory mechanism the Golgi control system. A key player in this Golgi control system is the KDEL receptor, which has previously been shown to retrieve chaperones back to the endoplasmic reticulum and more recently to behave as a signaling receptor. Here, we discuss the particular role of KDEL receptor signaling in the regulation of important pathways involved in the maintenance of the homeostasis of the transport apparatus, and in particular, of the Golgi complex.
    Histochemie 07/2013; 140(4). DOI:10.1007/s00418-013-1130-9 · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "A machinery component of COPI vesicles with another dilysine motif is the seven-helix transmembrane protein KDEL receptor that functions as a transmembrane adaptor. Its cytosolic tail interacts with coatomer via a KKXSXXX signal, active only when its serine residue is phosphorylated (Cabrera et al. 2003), whereas its luminal part interacts with soluble proteins that harbor a C-terminal KDEL-sequence (Lewis and Pelham 1992). As a result, KDEL-proteins are included into COPI vesicles and retrieved to the ER (Pelham 1991; Majoul et al. 1998), where they dissociate from the KDEL receptor, probably because of a difference of pH between Golgi and ER (Wilson et al. 1993). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Golgi serves as a hub for intracellular membrane traffic in the eukaryotic cell. Transport within the early secretory pathway, that is within the Golgi and from the Golgi to the endoplasmic reticulum, is mediated by COPI-coated vesicles. The COPI coat shares structural features with the clathrin coat, but differs in the mechanisms of cargo sorting and vesicle formation. The small GTPase Arf1 initiates coating on activation and recruits en bloc the stable heptameric protein complex coatomer that resembles the inner and the outer shells of clathrin-coated vesicles. Different binding sites exist in coatomer for membrane machinery and for the sorting of various classes of cargo proteins. During the budding of a COPI vesicle, lipids are sorted to give a liquid-disordered phase composition. For the release of a COPI-coated vesicle, coatomer and Arf cooperate to mediate membrane separation.
    Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology 08/2011; 3(11):a005231. DOI:10.1101/cshperspect.a005231 · 8.23 Impact Factor
Show more