Article

Thin melanomas: predictive lethal characteristics from a 30-year clinical experience.

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Annals of Surgery (Impact Factor: 7.19). 10/2003; 238(4):528-35; discussion 535-7.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To guide treatment and clinical follow-up by defining the natural history of thin melanomas and identifying negative prognostic characteristics that may delineate high-risk patients.
In following > 10,000 patients with cutaneous melanoma over the past 30 years, our institution has observed nodal or metastatic disease in approximately 15% of patients with a thin (<1 mm) primary lesion.
A database query of patients with cutaneous melanoma returned 1158 patients with primary lesion < or = 1 mm thick and who received their initial treatment at a single institution. Median follow-up was 11 years (range, 1 to 34 years). Patient and melanoma characteristics as well as outcomes were recorded and statistically analyzed.
6.6% of patients had nodal or distant disease at presentation. Over time, an additional 9.4% developed metastases, including nodal and distal recurrences. Overall incidence of advanced disease was 15.3%. Univariate analysis identified male gender (P = 0.01), advanced age (>45 years; P = 0.05), and Breslow thickness (>0.75 mm; P = 0.008) as significant negative prognostic characteristics. Of patients with these 3 high-risk characteristics, 19.7% developed advanced disease (likelihood ratio 6.3; P = 0.007 versus nonhigh-risk patients). This group had more than twice the incidence of nodal recurrences. Patients with recurrence had significantly decreased 10-year survival (82% versus 45%; P < 0.0001). Surprisingly, neither ulceration nor Clark level predicted advanced disease.
Thin melanomas are potentially lethal lesions. Long-term follow-up identified a high-risk population of older males with tumors between 0.75 mm and 1.0 mm whose risk of recurrent disease approaches 20%. Traditionally accepted negative prognostic factors such as ulceration and discordant Clark levels are not predictive for metastasis in this population. Given the poor prognosis associated with recurrent disease, we recommend close clinical evaluation and follow-up to maximize accurate staging and therapeutic options.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
93 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Dutch melanoma guideline advises to examine one central block of the re-excision scar in case of a complete primary excision. To increase the evidence for this recommendation, we re-evaluated how often residual melanoma was found in re-excision specimens of a large series of completely excised melanomas. Of 1,209 Dutch melanoma cases, pathology reports of primary excisions were reviewed. Presence of melanoma in the margins was scored. All melanomas with a complete primary excision were included and pathology reports of re-excisions were reviewed. Presence of residual melanoma in the re-excision specimen and the number of blocks were scored. Slides of re-excision specimens containing residual melanoma were reviewed. Eventually, in four out of 812 melanomas (0.5 %) with a complete primary excision, residual melanoma was found in the re-excision specimen. The free margins of the primary melanomas in these cases ranged from 0.5-3.5 mm. In one case, the margin for melanoma in situ was 0.2 mm. In <1 % of initially completely excised melanomas, residual melanoma was found in the re-excision specimen. Histopathological examination of these re-excision specimens may not be cost-efficient. Our findings even imply that a re-excision could safely be omitted in selected cases of completely excised melanomas.
    Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin 05/2014; · 2.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Dataset: is 1 mm
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This contemporary review of melanoma surveillance strategies seeks to help practitioners examine and improve their surveillance protocols based on the currently available data. In general, there is no definitive benefit from increased screening or more aggressive use of interval imaging. Low-intensity surveillance strategies do not appear to adversely affect patient outcomes and should be the preferred approach compared with high-intensity strategies for most melanoma patients. All surveillance programs should emphasize education in order to maximize the effectiveness of patient-based detection of recurrent disease.
    Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2013; · 3.94 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
1 Download
Available from