Basing decisions on better quality routine clinical data.

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Quality and Safety in Health Care (Impact Factor: 2.16). 11/2003; 12(5):327-8. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.5.327
Source: PubMed
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Quality assurance is a backbone for the provision of health care. This has lead to the introduction of systems to evaluate and improve patient care. Currently, a 29-category monitoring is mandatory for all German hospitals (EQS, Einrichtungsübergreifende Qualitätssicherung). Since 2007, the incidence rate of pressure ulcers as an indicator for quality of care has been incorporated. A concern associated with the EQS is the requirement for active data entry by doctors and nurses, whereas the US-based patient safety indicator "PSI 3 - pressure ulcer" relies on routine clinical data without the need for additional documentation. In this study, we perform a head-to-head comparison of the 2 methods and analyze the feasibility of implementing the PSI 3 system in German hospitals on the example of pressure ulcer incidence in a German academic hospital. Our analysis shows that the usage of the PSI 3 is feasible. In particular, all clinical data are readily available. Critical advantages of the PSI 3 include the low time consumption and the positive economic impact due to increased work-flow. A prerequisite for the accuracy of the PSI 3 is the careful distinction and documentation of whether a condition (in our case: pressure ulcers) is pre-existing or hospital-acquired. In this regard, the accurate documentation of admission diagnoses is a potential weakness because these are not essential for reimbursement from health insurances and thus tend to be less well documented. In the US and Australia this problem has been addressed by introducing "present on admission" tabs into patient records. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the usage of a quality assurance system based on routinely acquired clinical data in German hospitals is feasible, and encourages further evaluation.
    Das Gesundheitswesen 12/2011; 73(12):803-9. DOI:10.1055/s-0030-1262865 · 0.62 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – The paper aims to outline benchmarking and performance monitoring practice developed by the New Zealand Health Information Service at a diagnosis-related group (DRG) level. Design/methodology/approach – The indicators are calculated from the routine hospital discharge data in the National Minimum Dataset. The benchmarks are set at either the 20th or 80th centile as a cut-point that can alert to possible issues or a target for which to aim. Benchmarks can be used to highlight variations by making comparisons with other health-care providers or the same provider over time. Findings – This approach provides an indication of which DRGs and outcome variables may be worth looking at in more detail. Using comparative measures across providers allows the identification of areas of health care with the most potential for gain. Practical implications – There is strong evidence of changed clinical practice and improved health outcomes following systematic evaluation of some patient management practices. Originality/value – This overview of benchmarking practice using routine data with some distinctive features would be of interest to those with similar undertakings.
    Benchmarking An International Journal 11/2005; 12(6):498-507. DOI:10.1108/14635770510628636
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The need to improve the clinical assessment and management of acutely poisoned patients presenting to an NHS hospital emergency department (ED). Creation of an electronic clinical toxicology database to prospectively collect all aspects of clinical information on poisoned-patient presentations. Systematic analysis of collated information to identify shortfalls in patient assessment and management. Bimonthly audit meetings, and design and implementation of educational interventions to address identified shortfalls. Ongoing audit to demonstrate continued improvement in patient care. ED in tertiary-level inner-city London teaching hospital. Study conducted by staff from the ED and clinical toxicology service. Demonstration of overall reduction in the incidence of predefined shortfalls in patient assessment and management during 12-month study period. Strategies for improvement: Targeted educational lectures and case-based clinical scenarios addressing identified deficiencies in the knowledge required to effectively manage poisoned patients. Weekly case-based anonymised feedback report sent electronically to staff involved in caring for poisoned patients. Implementation of targeted teaching of ED staff and regular electronic distribution of teaching cases. Between the first and second 6 months of the study, there was a significant increase in the proportion of presentations for which clinical management was graded as "good" (77.6% to 89.4%, p<0.0001) and a significant reduction in the proportion of "major" (9.9% to 5.8%, p = 0.012) and "minor" (12.6% to 4.8%, p<0.0001) shortfalls. Systematic collection of clinical information, using a dedicated electronic database and subsequent review and audit of collated data by interested clinicians, enabled design and implementation of targeted educational interventions to address shortfalls in patient management. This process has led to significant improvements in the clinical care of acutely poisoned patients presenting to the ED.
    Postgraduate medical journal 11/2008; 84(997):603-8. DOI:10.1136/pgmj.2007.066043 · 1.55 Impact Factor