Predicting falls within the elderly community: comparison of postural sway, reaction time, the Berg balance scale and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale for comparing fallers and non-fallers.

School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, 125 University St, Ottawa, Ont., Canada K1N6N5.
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics (Impact Factor: 1.7). 01/2004; 38(1):11-26. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-4943(03)00082-7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Simple reaction time, the Berg balance scale, the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale and postural sway were studied in order to determine cut-off scores as well as develop a model used in the prevention of fallers within the elderly community. One hundred and twenty-five subjects, 45 fallers and 80 non-fallers were evaluated throughout the study and results indicated that non-fallers have significantly faster reaction times, have higher scores on the Berg balance scale and the ABC scale as well as sway at slower frequencies when compared to fallers. Furthermore, all risk factors were subsequently entered into a logistic regression analysis and results showed that reaction time, the total Berg score and the total ABC score contributed significantly to the prediction of falls with 89% sensitivity and 96% specificity. A second logistic regression was carried out with the same previous variables as well as all questions of the Berg and ABC scales. Results from the logistic analysis revealed that three variables were associated with fall status with 91% sensitivity and 97% specificity. Results from the following study would seem rather valuable as an assessment tool for health care professionals in the identification and monitoring of potential fallers within nursing homes and throughout the community.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The responsiveness (sensitivity to change) of many self-report measures commonly used with individuals who have balance and vestibular dysfunction has not been assessed. The purpose of this study was to determine the responsiveness of 4 self-report measures including the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), and Vestibular Activities and Participation (VAP) scale in people seeking treatment for vertigo, dizziness, and unsteadiness. A prospective descriptive study. Forty-five patients (mean age, 56 yr; range, 18-79 yr) with vertigo, dizziness, and unsteadiness were included. Participants completed the measures at their initial physician examination and 4 to 6 weeks later. The follow-up visit included a Global Rating of Change Scale (GROC). The change in total scores for each self-report measure from initial visit to follow-up visit were recorded and compared against the GROC. A Spearman correlation was performed to determine the relationship between all 4 self-report measures and the GROC. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was also used to evaluate responsiveness. Significant correlations were found between the GROC and ABC (ρ = 0.50), DHI (ρ = 0.61), and FES-I (ρ = 0.36) but not the VAP (ρ = 0.27). The ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve was significantly greater than 0.5 for the ABC, DHI, and FES-I. The DHI demonstrated the greatest responsiveness, with an optimal cutoff of a change in 3 points related to significant change.
    Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 06/2014; 35(5):884-8. · 1.44 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We performed a retrospective chart review to determine the responsiveness and minimal detectable change (MDC95) in persons with balance and vestibular disorders with the dynamic gait index (DGI) and the functional gait assessment (FGA). The study cohort consisted of 326 patients with a mean age of 60 ± 18.3 years (range, 18-95 years; 69% female). The DGI, FGA, Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale, and the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) were collected at intake and discharge. The standardized response mean as an index of responsiveness was greater for the FGA (1.25) than for the DGI (0.72). Both measures demonstrated good internal consistency with baseline measures. The amount of pre- to posttreatment change that exceeds chance variation was estimated at 4 points for the DGI and 6 points for the FGA. In both the DGI and the FGA, a magnitude of change equivalent to the respective MDC95 was significantly associated with improvements in self-reported disability as measured by the ABC and DHI. The DGI and the FGA are responsive to change over time in persons with balance and vestibular disorders. More complex gait measures need to be developed, as close to 50% of the subjects received optimal scores at discharge from a physical therapy exercise program, indicating that these measures have a ceiling effect.Video Abstract available (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, for more insights from the authors).
    Journal of neurologic physical therapy: JNPT 04/2014; 38(2):119-24. · 1.65 Impact Factor
  • Source

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 22, 2014