Quality improvement for pressure ulcer care in the nursing home setting: the Northeast Pressure Ulcer Project.

Department of Community Health, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (Impact Factor: 4.78). 11/2003; 4(6):291-301. DOI: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000094064.06058.74
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The objectives of this study were to evaluate the impact of a collaborative model of quality improvement in nursing homes on processes of care for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers.
The study design was experimental.
We studied 29 nursing homes in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island.
Participants consisted of pressure ulcer quality improvement teams in 29 nursing homes.
Quality improvement teams attended a series of workshops to review clinical guidelines and quality improvement principles and to share best practices, and worked one-on-one with mentors to implement quality improvement techniques and to collect data independently.
We calculated process measures based on the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) guidelines. Process measures addressed each facility's processes of care for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers at baseline and after 12 months of intervention. Prevention measures focused on recent admissions and high-risk residents; treatment measures focused on patients newly diagnosed with pressure ulcers and all patients with pressure ulcers.
Overall, 6 of 8 prevention process measures improved significantly, with percent difference between baseline and follow up ranging from 11.6% to 24.5%. Three of 4 treatment process measures improved significantly, with 5.0%, 8.9%, and 25.9% difference between baseline and follow up. For each process measure, between 5 and 12 facilities demonstrated significant improvement between baseline and follow up, and only 2 or fewer declined for each process measure.
Improvement in processes of care after the use of a structured collaborative quality improvement approach is possible in the nursing home setting.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pressure ulcers are a significant iatrogenic cause of morbidity and mortality in the aged care population, with prevalence reported to be as high as 43% in some aged care facilities. The PRIME trial was a 15-month pre- and post-intervention study designed to investigate the effectiveness of an integrated pressure ulcer management system consisting of pressure ulcer risk assessment tools, Australian Wound Management Association (AWMA) guidelines, digital imaging and clinical education in reducing pressure ulcer prevalence in residential aged care facilities. A total of 1228 residents from 23 residential aged care facilities were enrolled in this Commonwealth-funded study. The findings suggest that the PRIME intervention significantly reduced pressure ulcer prevalence risk by 52% (p
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To test the effectiveness of a pressure ulcer (PU) prevention intervention featuring musical cues to remind all long-term care (LTC) staff (nursing and ancillary) to help every resident move or reposition every 2 hours. Twelve-month paired-facility two-arm (with one-arm crossover) randomized intervention trial. Ten midwestern U.S. LTC facilities. Four treatment facilities received intervention during Months 1 to 12, four comparison facilities received intervention during Months 7 to 12, and two pseudo-control facilities received no intervention. LTC facility residents (N = 1,928). All facility staff received in-person education, video, and handouts, and visiting family members received informational pamphlets on PU prevention and an intervention featuring musical cues. Nurse-led multidisciplinary staff teams presented the cues as prompts for staff and family to reposition residents or remind them to move. Musical selections (with and without lyrics) customized to facility preferences were played daily over the facility intercom or public address system every 2 hours for the 12-hour daytime period. Primary outcome measure was the frequency of new facility-acquired PUs divided by the total number of facility Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments conducted during the study period. Odds of a new PU were lower in intervention facilities (P = .08) for MDS 2.0 assessments and were significantly lower (P = .05) for MDS 3.0. Mean odds ratios suggested intervention facility residents were 45% less likely than comparison facility residents to develop a new PU. Customized musical cues that prompt multidisciplinary staff teams to encourage or enable movement of all residents hold promise for reducing facility-acquired PUs in LTC settings.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 09/2013; 61(9):1552-9. · 4.22 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Falling is a significant cause of injury and death in frail older adults. Residents in long-term care (LTC) facilities fall for a variety of reasons and are more likely to endure injuries after a fall than those in the community The American Medical Directors Association (AMDA) Clinical Practice Guideline is written to give LTC staff an understanding of risk factors for falls and provide guidance for a systematic approach to patient assessment and selection of appropriate interventions. It is intended to help facilities establish processes for evaluating, managing, and preventing falls. AMDA guidelines are written specifically for the elder in the LTC setting. Facility teams systematically address each individual's risk factors for falls and fall risks and the adverse consequences on the patient's functioning and quality of life. AMDA guidelines emphasize key care processes and are organized for ready incorporation into facility-specific policies and procedures to guide staff and practitioner practices and performance.
    Translational behavioral medicine. 06/2012; 2(2):241-3.

Rosa R Baier