Maxillary sinus elevation surgery: an overview.

New York University College of Dentistry, Ashman Department of Implant Dentistry, Division of Reconstructive and Comprehensive Care, New York, NY, USA.
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (Impact Factor: 0.96). 02/2003; 15(5):272-82; discussion 283. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00298.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Maxillary sinus elevation surgery was developed to increase the height of bone available for implant placement in the posterior maxilla. The efficacy and predictability of this procedure have been determined in numerous studies. The basic approach to the sinus (Caldwell-Luc operation) involves an osteotomy performed on the lateral maxillary wall, elevation of the sinus membrane, and placement of bone graft material. The graft materials can be categorized into four groups: autogenous bone, allografts (harvested from human cadavers), alloplasts (synthetic materials), and xenografts (grafts from a nonhuman species). These graft materials can be used alone or in combination with each other. Implant placement can occur at the same surgical procedure (immediate placement) or following a healing period of 6 to 9 months (delayed placement). A more conservative approach to the sinus, the osteotome technique, has been described as well. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This article provides an overview of the surgical technique, with emphasis on anatomic considerations, preoperative patient evaluation (clinical and radiographic), indications and contraindications to the procedure, and possible risks and complications.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Titanium oxide (TiO(2)) scaffolds have previously been reported to exhibit very low mechanical strength. However, we have been able to produce a scaffold that features a high interconnectivity, a porosity of 91% and a compressive strength above 1.2MPa. This study analyzed the in vivo performance of the porous TiO(2) scaffolds in a peri-implant cortical defect model in the rabbit. After 8weeks of healing, morphological microcomputed tomography analyses of the defects treated with the TiO(2) scaffolds had significantly higher bone volume, bone surface and bone surface-to-volume ratio when compared to sham, both in the cortical and bone marrow compartment. No adverse effects, i.e. tissue necrosis or inflammation as measured by lactate dehydrogenase activity and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis, were observed. Moreover, the scaffold did not hinder bone growth onto the adjacent cortical titanium implant. Histology clearly demonstrated new bone formation in the cortical sections of the defects and the presence of newly formed bone in close proximity to the scaffold surface and the surface of the adjacent Ti implant. Bone-to-material contact between the newly formed bone and the scaffold was observed in the histological sections. Islets of new bone were also present in the marrow compartment albeit in small amounts. In conclusion, the present investigation demonstrates that TiO(2) scaffolds osseointegrate well and are a suitable scaffold for peri-implant bone healing and growth.
    Acta biomaterialia 09/2012; · 5.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent and quality of new bone 6 months after sinus lift with biphasic micro- and macroporous calcium phosphate combined with fibrin sealant (MBCP-FS) and the 1-year implant success rate in the augmented site. MBCP-FS was applied to one sinus in 96 subjects requiring augmentation for delayed dental implant placement. In subjects who required bilateral lifts (N = 33), the MBCP-FS sinus was randomly selected; the contralateral sinus was grafted with autologous bone (mixed with Bio-Oss when harvested bone volume was insufficient. Panoramic views were taken periodically prior to and up to 18 months post-lift. Histomorphometric analysis was conducted on biopsies taken during implant placement 6 months after augmentation. Implant functionality and prosthesis success were assessed clinically 1 year after implant placement. In MBCP-FS sinuses, 20.6 ± 8.5% new, mainly lamellar bone was observed. Implants were placed as planned in 78/85 evaluable subjects (91.8%) 6 months after sinus lift. Graft heights remained stable 1 year after placement; 94.7% (142/150) of implants were functional. The amount and quality of new bone and implant success rates with MBCP-FS were similar to autologous bone graft (mixed with Bio-Oss in 30/31 evaluable subjects). MBCP-FS was safe and well-tolerated. MBCP-FS is safe and effective in sinus floor elevation for dental implant placement, supporting bone regeneration and with high 1-year implant success rates similar to autologous bone mixed with Bio-Oss.
    Clinical Oral Implants Research 09/2012; 23(9):1112-7. · 3.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This multislice tomographic study evaluated the dimensional changes after maxillary sinus augmentation using autogenous bone or a mixture of hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone. Ten selected patients, requiring a bilateral maxillary sinus augmentation, were divided, in a split mouth, design as follows: control group (CG n = 10 sinus grafted with autogenous bone) and test group (TG, n = 10 sinus grafted with a mixture of hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone at 80 : 20 w/w). Follow a healing period of 15 and 180 days, computed tomography (CT) measurements were taken by two blinded and calibrated examiners to verify the volumetric dimensional changes of the both groups. The interobserver agreement obtained ranged from good to excellent for both groups. Both groups presented significant dimensional changes after 180 days period healing (P < 0.05). The volumetric reduction in test group was lower (25.87%) when compared with the CG (42.30%) (P < 0.05). The both graft materials improved the bone volumetric ability to anchorage a dental implant. Moreover, the mixture of HA and autogenous bone graft showed lower degree of resorption and higher dimensional stability when compared with autogenous bone graft alone, at least at 180 days of healing. The CT exam protocol should be used as an important tool to measure bone grafts volumetric alterations.
    Clinical Oral Implants Research 09/2013; · 3.43 Impact Factor