Effect of firmness of mattress on chronic non-specific low-back pain: randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial

Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
The Lancet (Impact Factor: 39.21). 12/2003; 362(9396):1599-604. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14792-7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A firm mattress is commonly believed to be beneficial for low-back pain, although evidence supporting this recommendation is lacking. We assessed the effect of different firmnesses of mattresses on the clinical course of patients with chronic non-specific low-back pain.
In a randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial, we assessed 313 adults who had chronic non-specific low-back pain, but no referred pain, who complained of backache while lying in bed and on rising. Mattress firmness is rated on a scale developed by the European Committee for Standardisation. The H(s) scale starts at 1.0 (firmest) and stops at 10.0 (softest). We randomly assigned participants firm mattresses (H(s)=2.3) or medium-firm mattresses (H(s)=5.6). We did clinical assessments at baseline and at 90 days. Primary endpoints were improvements in pain while lying in bed, pain on rising, and disability.
At 90 days, patients with medium-firm mattresses had better outcomes for pain in bed (odds ratio 2.36 [95% CI 1.13-4.93]), pain on rising (1.93 [0.97-3.86]), and disability (2.10 [1.24-3.56]) than did patients with firm mattresses. Throughout the study period, patients with medium-firm mattresses also had less daytime low-back pain (p=0.059), pain while lying in bed (p=0.064), and pain on rising (p=0.008) than did patients with firm mattresses.
A mattress of medium firmness improves pain and disability among patients with chronic non-specific low-back pain.


Available from: Francisco M Kovacs, Jun 03, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There have been many studies to investigate the sleeping comfort of mattresses that have been evaluated sensory tests and body pressure distribution. Measurement of stress distribution within the human body would provide valuable information. Numerical analysis is one of the most desirable techniques to estimate stress distribution in lieu of an invasive measurement. In this study, a two-dimensional human body-mattress model was developed by using Finite Element method to examine sleeping comfort of mattress. We constructed both male and female Finite Element models with the use of the statistical data on Japanese human body dimensions. We utilized von Mises stress as an evaluation criterion of sleeping comfort and performed the Finite Element analysis iteratively while modifying Young's moduli of mattress to investigate which mattress firmness yields the lowest stress on the lumbar region. When Young's modulus of mattress was of medium firmness (that is, neither high nor low), the lowest stress on the lumbar region was found and sleeping comfort was regarded to be most appropriate. As a result of the Finite Element analysis, this characteristic of mattress firmness generated the lowest stress within the human body was changed owing to the difference of both human body dimensions and material properties of the human soft tissues. Subjective preference of mattress firmness is assumed to be determined according to body dimensions and material properties of the human soft tissues. Therefore, Finite Element analysis is considered to be one of the best tools for studying the sleeping comfort of mattresses.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The treatment and management of low back pain is complex when there is no specific etiology such as cancer, fracture, or herniated disc. An organized approach to management that follows evidence based guidelines will facilitate care in a problem that reflects a lifetime prevalence of over 70 percent. The purpose of this review is to present a guideline to care for a common disabling process with a very heterogeneous etiology.
    Health Services Insights 01/2013; 6:33-8. DOI:10.4137/HSI.S10469
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: IntroductionNon-specific chronic low back pain is a common problem in the working age population. Multimodal physiotherapy is the combination of the best three short-time interventions; advice, manual therapy and physical exercise. There are sufficient bases to consider that deep water running increases the effects size when they complement each other. Use of studies that collect pre- and post-intervention data only at the end of it has been shown to be valid.
    Fisioterapia 01/2010; 32(1):17-24. DOI:10.1016/j.ft.2009.06.005