An outcome evaluation of sphincter pharyngoplasty for the management of velopharyngeal insufficiency.

Division of Plastic Surgery, Emory University and Center for Craniofacial Disorders, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Scottish Rite, GA, USA.
Plastic &amp Reconstructive Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.54). 01/2004; 112(7):1755-61. DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000090720.33554.8B
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Sphincter pharyngoplasty is frequently used for the management of children with velopharyngeal insufficiency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcome and revision rates of sphincter pharyngoplasty at the authors' institution. Two hundred fifty patients underwent sphincter pharyngoplasty for velopharyngeal insufficiency between January of 1987 and March of 2001. There were 117 female patients and 133 male patients, with a mean age at primary sphincter pharyngoplasty of 7.6 years (range, 1 to 45 years). Diagnoses included velopharyngeal insufficiency alone (n = 63), velopharyngeal insufficiency associated with cleft palate (n = 127), velocardiofacial syndrome (n = 32), submucous cleft (n = 15), and other (n = 13). Pharyngoplasty revision was defined as any secondary surgical revision of the sphincter as determined by clinical evaluation and objective speech assessment. The pharyngoplasty revision rate was found to be 12.8 percent (n = 32). A favorable outcome was demonstrated in 30 of these patients (93.8 percent) after pharyngoplasty revision. Two patients, one with a diagnosis of a submucous cleft and velocardiofacial syndrome and the other with a cleft palate, required a second revision because of persistent velopharyngeal insufficiency. The revision rate was highest in those patients with velocardiofacial syndrome (21.8 percent) and lowest in patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency alone (6.3 percent). Patients who required revision had significantly higher preoperative oral sentence nasometry (55.2 percent versus 46.1 percent; p < 0.01) and larger velopharyngeal areas (23.7 mm2 versus 18.9 mm2). There was no significant difference in age or sex for those patients who required a revision compared with those who did not require revision. Mean follow-up was 2.4 years (range, 4 months to 13.6 years). Sphincter pharyngoplasty is an effective procedure for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency using revision rate as the standard of success. It had an 87 percent primary success rate that increased to 99 percent after a single revision. Patients with velocardiofacial syndrome, more severe preoperative hypernasal resonance, and larger velopharyngeal areas were more likely to require pharyngoplasty revision.

  • 01/2005;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) may be associated with several palatal abnormalities, including overt cleft palate, submucosal cleft palate, palatopharyngeal disproportion, and velar hypotonia. The syndrome is the genetic disorder most commonly associated with velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD). The complex causes of VPD in affected patients combine with the complexity of associated medical disorders to render surgical management of the velopharynx particularly challenging. Optimization of surgical outcomes requires precision in diagnosis, surgical management, and multidisciplinary care. This article provides an overview of 22q11DS and provides a review of the assessment and surgical management of VPD in affected individuals.
    Clinics in plastic surgery 04/2014; 41(2):271-282. · 0.95 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Determine the impact of adenoid size and prior adenoidectomy on outcomes of sphincter pharyngoplasty.Study Design: Retrospective reviewMethods: Retrospective review of patients eighteen years of age or younger, who underwent sphincter pharyngoplasty for velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) from 2007-2012. Nasal endoscopy and nasometry testing were administered pre- and post-operatively. Pre-operative adenoid size was scored by two blinded otolaryngologists. Primary outcome measures were sphincter pharyngoplasty revision rate, achievement of normal resonance, and degree of improvement in nasometry scores.Results: Eighty-six patients were included in this study. The overall rate of revision sphincter pharyngoplasty was 28%. Patients with mild adenoid hypertrophy underwent less revision surgery (14%) than patients with moderate to severe adenoid hypertrophy (38%, p=0.046). Subgroup analysis was performed based on prior repair of cleft or submucous cleft palate, and history of 22q11 microdeletion. Smaller adenoids were associated with lower surgical revision rates in patients who did not have a history of cleft palate or 22q11 microdeletion (p=0.014 and 0.018, respectively). Adenoid size did not impact revision rates in patients with repaired cleft palates or those with 22q11 microdeletions.Conclusion: Smaller or absent adenoids are associated with lower rates of revision surgery after sphincter pharyngoplasty in children with VPI. Patients with VPI and bulky adenoids, who do not have a history of cleft palate or 22q11 microdeletion, should be considered for adenoidectomy prior to sphincter pharyngoplasty.
    The Laryngoscope 03/2014; · 1.98 Impact Factor