The effects of motivation, coaching, and knowledge of neuropsychology on the simulated malingering of head injury.

Department of Psychology, The Colorado College, 14 East Cache La Poudre Street, Colorado Springs, CO 80903, USA.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (Impact Factor: 2). 02/2004; 19(1):73-88. DOI: 10.1016/S0887-6177(02)00214-7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Two student groups, introductory psychology (n=91) and advanced neuroscience (n=34) undergraduates, were asked to malinger a head injury on Rey's 15-Item Test (FIT) and Dot Counting Test (DCT). The participants were randomly assigned to one of three motivation conditions (no motivation given, compensation, avoidance of blame for a motor vehicle accident) and to one of three coaching conditions (no coaching, coaching post-concussive symptoms, coaching symptoms plus warning of malingering detection). Analyses revealed a MotivationxStudent Group interaction on the FIT, indicating that the advanced neuroscience students, particularly when in the compensation condition, malingered the most flagrantly. On the DCT, main effects for motivation and coaching on the qualitative variables and a MotivationxCoaching interaction on the accuracy variables indicated that those in the compensation condition performed the most poorly, and that coaching plus warning only tempers malingering on memory tasks, not timed tasks.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Coaching is a topic of utmost importance for forensic neuropsychological assessment, and symptom validity tests (SVTs) should be resistant against it. Four groups of experimental malingerers (n = 15, each) were given scenarios to feign cognitive symptoms after traumatic brain injury. Group A obtained a basic scenario. For Group B, symptom information was added. Group C received an explicit warning against exaggerating symptom presentation. Group D obtained a specific coaching which contained an introduction into principles of effort measurement. All groups were given a short neuropsychological battery including three SVTs: the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test (ASTM), the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT), and the Word Completion Memory Test (WCMT). While a general trend for gradually better results in SVTs from Group A to Group D was observed, only in Group D were pass rates elevated for the MSVT and the WCMT. Not a single participant passed the ASTM test. Coaching appears to be more effective when principles of effort testing are described in detail. The use of more than one SVT in an evaluation is recommended.
    Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology. 08/2009; 4(4).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Very little is known about the autonomic psychophysiological responses while individuals are executing a Symptom Validity Test. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the peripheral psychophysiological correlates (electrodermal conductance and heart rate) during the performance of the Victoria Symptom Validity Test (VSVT). The sample of this study was composed of 30 participants who underwent the VSVT under two conditions: Exaggeration of cognitive deficits (ECD) and normal effort. Our results showed differences on skin conductance between correct answers and errors limited to the decision-making phase of the ECD condition. Those differences found in the maximum conductance value when participants decide to simulate their deficits could be related to emotional activation. No differences were found on the variable heart rate between the two conditions of the study. Implications of these results are discussed.
    Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 03/2011; 26(2):133-43. · 2.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: The aim of the present study was to explore whether commonly used clinical scales are able to detect malin-gered burnout. Methods: The Maslach Burnout Inventory–General Survey (MBI-GS) and the Symptoms Checklist 90 (SCL-90) were administered to four groups. In the first group, healthy participants were asked to fill out the questionnaires hon-estly (n = 20). The second group consisted of healthy participants who were instructed to malinger a burnout (n = 19). In the third group, participants were not only asked to feign a burnout, they were also told not to exaggerate their symptoms (n = 20). The fourth group consisted of people with "burnout" symptoms who were recruited through re-sponse on a "burnout" website (n =20). Results: Participants in the two malinger groups reported more symptoms on the two scales than either the honest re-sponders or the "burnout" patients. Patients with "burnout" reported more symptoms than the honest responders. Conclusion: This pattern suggests that overendorsement of items on scales like the MBI-GS and the SCL-90, may be an indication of malingered burnout (German J Psychiatry 2006; 9: 10-16).
    Cognition & Emotion - COGNITION EMOTION. 01/2006;


Available from