Assessing the needs of people with learning disabilities and mental illness: development of the Learning Disability version of the Cardinal Needs Schedule.

School of Health Studies, University of Bradford, UK.
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (Impact Factor: 1.88). 02/2004; 48(1):25-36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2004.00587.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT People with learning disability (LD) experience a range of mental health problems. They are a complex population, whose needs are not well understood. This study focuses on the development of a systematic process of needs assessment for this population.
The Cardinal Needs Schedule used in general psychiatry was adapted for people with learning disabilities (LD). The Learning Disability version of the Cardinal Needs Schedule (LDCNS) was tested on a sample of 35 people with LD and mental illness for its inter-rater reliability.
The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was calculated for 22 areas of functioning assessed by the LDCNS. Overall, there was very good agreement in seven areas, moderate agreement in six areas, fair agreement in three areas and poor agreement in one area. In four areas of functioning, Kappa could not be calculated. More needs were found in the social domain than in the clinical domain.
A systematic needs assessment schedule (LDCNS) was developed for people with LD and mental illness. The inter-rater reliability is generally acceptable, but requires further examination.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper presents a general statistical methodology for the analysis of multivariate categorical data arising from observer reliability studies. The procedure essentially involves the construction of functions of the observed proportions which are directed at the extent to which the observers agree among themselves and the construction of test statistics for hypotheses involving these functions. Tests for interobserver bias are presented in terms of first-order marginal homogeneity and measures of interobserver agreement are developed as generalized kappa-type statistics. These procedures are illustrated with a clinical diagnosis example from the epidemiological literature.
    Biometrics 04/1977; 33(1):159-74. · 1.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: First rank symptoms are central to the diagnosis of schizophrenia, but their complexity makes it difficult to validly detect them in people with learning disability. This report investigates ability of PAS-ADD to detect schizophrenia, validated against expert clinical opinion. The sample consisted of 98 patients with learning disabilities and a key informant for each sample member. Clinical opinions of the referring psychiatrists were sought using a symptom checklist. Reportage of remission, and the number of core schizophrenia symptoms identified, were used to estimate level of symptom activity at time of interview. The proportion of schizophrenia cases detected by PAS-ADD increases with the number of active core symptoms identified by the referrer. Where two or more core symptoms were indicated, PAS-ADD detected 71% cases. The most frequently fulfilled criterion was third-person auditory hallucinations. Six schizophrenia diagnoses disagreed with the clinician, four of which were referred as being hypomania. Overall symptom frequency detected by PAS-ADD was positively correlated with IQ. Results suggest there may be scope for modifying the ICD-10 diagnostic algorithm for use with learning disability, particularly in relation to the delusions and negative symptoms criteria.
    The British Journal of Psychiatry 04/1996; 168(3):359-67. · 7.34 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Psychiatric and behavioural disorders were found to be relatively common in a sample of 318 individuals with a mental handicap living in the community. Many of those referred for psychiatric assessment had other non-psychiatric problems. The presence of these other needs has been recognized, and had led to the emergence of a distinct group of professionals, therapists and support staff with whom psychiatrists need to liaise to devise an adequate and effective care plan. This study also highlights the need for the development of a methodology for assessing psychiatric disorders in people with a mental handicap.
    Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 09/1992; 36 ( Pt 4):349-57. · 1.88 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 5, 2014