Demographic threats to the sustainability of Brazil nut exploitation

Utrecht University, Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Science (Impact Factor: 31.48). 12/2003; 302(5653):2112-2114. DOI: 10.1126/science.1091698
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A comparative analysis of 23 populations of the Brazil nut tree (Bertholletia excelsa) across the Brazilian, Peruvian, and Bolivian Amazon shows that the history and intensity of Brazil nut exploitation are major determinants of population size structure. Populations subjected to persistent levels of harvest lack juvenile trees less than 60 centimeters in diameter at breast height; only populations with a history of either light or recent exploitation contain large numbers of juvenile trees. A harvesting model confirms that intensive exploitation levels over the past century are such that juvenile recruitment is insufficient to maintain populations over the long term. Without management, intensively harvested populations will succumb to a process of senescence and demographic collapse, threatening this cornerstone of the Amazonian extractive economy.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The effects of the present biodiversity crisis have been largely focused on the loss of species. However, a missed component of biodiversity loss that often accompanies or even precedes species disappearance is the extinction of ecological interactions. Here, we propose a novel model that (i) relates the diversity of both species and interactions along a gradient of environmental deterioration and (ii) explores how the rate of loss of ecological functions, and consequently of ecosystem services, can be accelerated or restrained depending on how the rate of species loss covaries with the rate of interactions loss. We find that the loss of species and interactions are decoupled, such that ecological interactions are often lost at a higher rate. This implies that the loss of ecological interactions may occur well before species disappearance, affecting species functionality and ecosystems services at a faster rate than species extinctions. We provide a number of empirical case studies illustrating these points. Our approach emphasizes the importance of focusing on species interactions as the major biodiversity component from which the ‘health’ of ecosystems depends.
    Functional Ecology 11/2014; 29(3). DOI:10.1111/1365-2435.12356 · 4.86 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Resumo: Procura-se descrever a trajetória da castanha-do-pará como produto obtido essencialmente da coleta e do início da domesticação pelas comunidades indígenas pré-colombianas. A despeito de ser um produto conhecido no mercado interno e externo, a castanheira foi sendo destruída, vítima das políticas públicas que eram seguidamente implantadas na Amazônia. Os imigrantes japoneses que se instalaram em Tomé-Açu (1929) e Parintins (1931) foram os primeiros a tentar o plantio de castanheiras em sistemas agroflorestais (SAF). Na década de 1980, com o desenvolvimento das técnicas de formação de mudas e de enxertia pela Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) Amazônia Oriental, iniciaram os plantios em grandes áreas, que apresentaram dificuldades com relação à sua viabilidade econômica. A perda da hegemonia brasileira frente à Bolívia, as mudanças no processo de comercialização e as dificuldades de transformá-la em uma planta de cultivo são desafios que se apresentam para o futuro. A inserção das castanheiras em SAF constitui a forma mais apropriada para garantir a sua viabilidade econômica. Abstract: We attempt to describe the historical trajectory of the Brazil nut as a product obtained essentially through gathering, and by the very earliest of Amerindian societies. Despite being an established product in both domestic and foreign markets, Brazil nut trees have suffered from the negative consequences of a series of public policies in the Amazon region. Japanese immigrants who settled in Tomé-Açu (1929) and Parintins (1931) were the first to try planting Brazil nut trees in agroforestry systems (AFS). In the 1980s, with the development of seedlings techniques and grafting by EMBRAPA Amazônia Oriental, large-scale plantations were attempted which struggled to achieve economic viability. The loss of Brazilian hegemony to Bolivia, the changes in the marketing process and the difficulties establishing the Brazil nut as a cultivated plant remain major challenges for the future. The inclusion of Brazil nut trees in agroforestry systems potentially offers one of the most promising ways to ensure their economic viability.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Extractive reserves are conservation units that are concurrently expected to sustain subsistence and cash economies of reserve residents, often through use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs). Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa) has been central to many Amazonian reserves and resident livelihoods therein, due to its basin-wide distribution, significance in global markets, and potential for sustainable use and forest conservation. Yet, do the benefits of this and other NTFPs extend to all extractive reserve residents? A livelihood survey, structured interviews, and Brazil nut inventories from 2008 to 2010, randomly sampling the widely dispersed households and corresponding forests across the three regions of Riozinho do Anfrisio Extractive Reserve (RDAER), revealed significant social and ecological heterogeneity among RDAER regions. There were differences in Brazil nut stand access, individual tree characteristics (including crown form and marginally, and fruit production), stand and tree management, multiple household characteristics that shape resident investment and dependence on NTFPs, and the contribution of Brazil nut to forest-based income. If Brazil nut and other NTFPs are to reconcile conservation and development in forest communities, then policies to regulate and promote NTFP use must integrate the socioecological heterogeneity inherent in these forest products and within reserve polygons.
    Environmental Conservation 09/2013; 41(03):242-252. DOI:10.1017/S0376892913000489 · 2.32 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 5, 2014