Evaluation of the arthritis impact measurement scales (AIMS2) in Finnish patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Rheumatism Foundation Hospital, Heinola, Finland.
Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology (Impact Factor: 2.22). 02/2003; 32(5):300-5. DOI: 10.1080/03009740310003947
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS2) in Finnish patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
The reliability of the Finnish AIMS2 (Finn-AIMS2) questionnaire was assessed by test retest procedure and internal consistency of health-status scales. Construct validity was assessed by factor analysis, and convergent validity by correlation coefficients, with several disease activity and functional status variables.
Internal consistency was 0.79-0.89 and test retest reliability 0.72-0.97. Factor analysis identified three factors: physical, psychosocial, and pain. There were strong correlations between the Finn-AIMS2 health-status scales and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ).
The Finn-AIMS2 questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring health status in middle-aged Finnish patients with RA. The results also support the applicability of AIMS2 in comparisons in multinational studies.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction Environmental effectors, such as ultraviolet radiation exposure, infection and stress, have been established as having a role in exacerbating lupus symptoms. However, unpredictable patterns of flare events still remain a mystery. Occupational effectors have also been suggested as having a contributing role; however, they are not widely researched. In this paper we report a pilot study designed to generate focus areas for future research regarding occupational exposures and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods The study explored potential links between exposures and the occurrence of patient-reported flare events in 80 Australian women with SLE (American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria classified). Specifically, the study assessed the hypothesis that occupational exposure is associated with significant changes in the likelihood of lupus flares. Lifetime employment history was analysed with the Finnish Job Exposure Matrix (FINJEM), 40 different semiquantified exposure class estimates for a wide number of occupations based on probability of exposure (p≥5%=exposed) were analysed with the construction of negative binomial regression models to test relationships between occupational agents and flare days. A backward stepwise elimination was used to generate a parsimonious model. Results Significant associations were noted for exposure classes of manual handling burden, (p=0.02, incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.01), Iron (p=0.00, IRR 1.37), wood dust (p=0.00, IRR 3.34) and asbestos (p=0.03, IRR 2.48). Conclusion Exposure assessment results indicated that occupations, such as nursing, with a high manual handling burden, posed increased risk to patients with SLE, however, the greatest risk was associated with wood dust and iron exposure with teachers and specialist labourers.
    Science & medicine 01/2014; 1(e000023).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study conducted a systematic review of the methodological quality of the psychometric evaluation process and the quality of measurement properties of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-specific health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaires with the purpose of obtaining the best evidence to help in the selection of the most appropriate instrument for measuring HRQOL in RA patients.
    Quality of Life Research 05/2014; · 2.86 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: To develop Portuguese evidence-based recommendations for pain management by pharmocotherapy in inflammatory arthritis. Methods: The Portuguese project was integrated in the multinational 3E Initiative (Evidence, Expertise, Exchange) 2010 where a total of 453 rheumatologists from 17 countries have participated. The clinical questions concerning pain were formulated and the Portuguese group added 2 more questions. A systematic literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and 2008-2009 EULAR and ACR abstracts. The selected articles were systematically reviewed and the evidence was defined according to the Oxford Levels of Evidence. In each country a group of experts joined to discuss their national recommendations. In Portugal, the national meeting was held in October 2010, where 33 rheumatologists discussed and voted by Delphi method the national recommendations. Finally, the agreement among the rheumatologists and the potential impact on their clinical practice was assessed. Results: Thirteen national recommendations were formulated: pain measure scores; analgesic combination therapy; pharmacotherapy in preconception, pregnancy and lactation periods; pharmacotherapy according to comorbilities; safety of NSAIDs and/or paracetamol with methotrexate combination therapy; efficacy and safety of continuous/on-demand NSAIDs; opioids, paracetamol, corticosteroids, antidepressants, neuromodulators and muscle relaxants role and effectiveness; risk factors for the development of chronic pain and the role of topic analgesics. Conclusion: The portuguese recommendations for the pain management by pharmacotherapy in inflammatory arthritis were formulated according to the best evidence and supported by a panel of 63 rheumatologists. The differences between the national and international recommendations are reported in this article.
    Acta reumatologica portuguesa 04/2012; 37(2):160-174. · 0.70 Impact Factor