SAGES FLS Committee. Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery

Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons, Los Angeles, Calif, USA.
Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.38). 02/2004; 135(1):21-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6060(03)00156-9
Source: PubMed


This study explores the volume-outcome relationship for gastric bypass surgery for obesity to determine whether higher-volume hospitals, higher-volume surgeons, or both are associated fewer adverse outcomes.
The Pennsylvania state discharge database was used to identify 4685 cases of gastric bypass surgery for obesity between 1999 and 2001. Statistical modeling analyses were used to determine whether mortality or adverse outcome rate was significantly related to hospital and surgeon volume; the data were controlled for risk factors such as age, gender, comorbidities, and others.
There were 28 deaths (0.6%) and 813 adverse outcomes (17.4%). There was a significant risk-adjusted relationship between surgeon volume and adverse outcome, and the same trend was observed for deaths. Surgeons who performed fewer than 10 procedures per year had a 28% risk of adverse outcome and a 5% risk of death, compared with 14% (P<.05) and 0.3% (P=.06), respectively, for high-volume surgeons. Hospital volume did not reach significance, but there was a striking interaction between surgeon and hospital volume; surgeons who performed 10 to 50 cases per year operating in low-volume hospitals had a 55% risk of adverse outcome (P<.01).
Risk-adjusted in-hospital adverse outcome is significantly lower when gastric bypass is performed by higher-volume surgeons.

1 Follower
36 Reads
  • Source
    • "In 1997 the Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) introduced the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) course [8] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Robotic surgery is a rapidly expanding field. Thus far training for robotic techniques has been unstructured and the requirements are variable across various regions. Several projects are currently underway to develop a robotic surgery curriculum and are in various stages of validation. We aimed to outline the structures of available curricula, their process of development, validation status and current utilization. Methods: We undertook a literature review of papers including the MeSH terms “Robotics” and “Education”. When we had an overview of curricula in development, we searched recent conference abstracts to gain up to date information. Results: The main curricula are the FRS, the FSRS, the Canadian BSTC and the ERUS initiative. They are in various stages of validation and offer a mixture of theoretical and practical training, using both physical and simulated models. Discussion: Whilst the FSRS is based on tasks on the RoSS virtual reality simulator, FRS and BSTC are designed for use on simulators and the robot itself. The ERUS curricula benefits from a combination of dry lab, wet lab and virtual reality components, which may allow skills to be more transferable to the OR as tasks are completed in several formats. Finally, the ERUS curricula includes the OR modular training programme as table assistant and console surgeon. Conclusion: Curricula are a crucial step in global standardisation of training and certification of surgeons for robotic surgical procedures. Many curricula are in early stages of development and more work is needed in development and validation of these programmes before training can be standardised.
    International Journal of Surgery 01/2015; 13. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.033 · 1.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "One of the currently most popular simulators is the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) trainer. This physical-box trainer, based on the McGill Inanimate System for Training and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Skills (MISTELS) [6], was developed to teach and measure basic laparoscopic skills through five basic tasks: peg transfer, pattern cutting, ligating loop, suturing with intracorporeal knot, and suturing with extracorporeal knot [4]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: The Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) trainer is currently the standard for training and evaluating basic laparoscopic skills. However, its manual scoring system is time-consuming and subjective. The Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer (VBLaST©) is the virtual version of the FLS trainer which allows automatic and real time assessment of skill performance, as well as force feedback. In this study, the VBLaST© pattern cutting (VBLaST-PC©) and ligating loop (VBLaST-LL©) tasks were evaluated as part of a validation study. We hypothesized that performance would be similar on the FLS and VBLaST© trainers, and that subjects with more experience would perform better than those with less experience on both trainers. Methods: Fifty-five subjects with varying surgical experience were recruited at the Learning Center during the 2013 SAGES annual meeting and were divided into two groups: experts (PGY 5, surgical fellows and surgical attendings) and novices (PGY 1-4). They were asked to perform the PC or the ligating loop task on the FLS and the VBLaST© trainers. Their performance scores for each trainer were calculated and compared. Results: There were no significant differences between the FLS and VBLaST© scores for either the PC or the ligating loop task. Experts' scores were significantly higher than the scores for novices on both trainers. Conclusion: This study showed that the subjects' performance on the VBLaST© trainer was similar to the FLS performance for both tasks. Both the VBLaST-PC© and the VBLaST-LL© tasks permitted discrimination between the novice and expert groups. Although concurrent and discriminant validity has been established, further studies to establish convergent and predictive validity are needed. Once validated as a training system for laparoscopic skills, the system is expected to overcome the current limitations of the FLS trainer.
    Surgical Endoscopy 08/2014; 29(4). DOI:10.1007/s00464-014-3764-7 · 3.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The current model of surgical education in Poland does not contain precise recommendations about the role of manual training in the laboratory, which is becoming increasingly popular in the USA (FLS programme) [1–6] and in Western Europe (LLS) [7], especially regarding laparoscopic training. In January 2011 the European Consensus on learning basic laparoscopic skills with virtual trainers was published [8]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Surgical education has become one of the most important directions in modern surgery evolution. To meet growing need for appropriate training in laparoscopic and, even more importantly, classic surgical skills, a curriculum involving contemporary tuition methods is needed. Advanced, structuralised training, which includes advanced technologies like virtual reality training, video coaching and motivative aspects of competition, seems to be important for an adequate education programme. In academic years 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 the Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery of the Medical University of Gdansk together with the Pomeranian Foundation for Progress in Surgery organized 4480 h of training in that area of classic (2744) and laparoscopic (1736) skills. Both groups were involved in the programme of training in which the two most important aspects were reliable evaluation of the results and effective motivation to work. Skill evaluation at different stages of the programme were based on completion time and quality measurements. Apart from that, at the end of the course, the participants completed a questionnaire on their subjective perspective on this innovative curriculum, the quality and stability of the skills they obtained. In both arms of the programme (laparoscopic and classic) a statistically significant improvement was obtained as early as after the second and third sessions in half of the exercises. The acquired skills were stable over time, as proved by the plateau of completion time achieved in 11 out of 12 exercises. The results of the post-training questionnaire revealed that the participants were very satisfied with the structuralised form of training and appreciated the motivational role of competition. Contemporary surgical training should be organized as a systematic, well-evaluated and goal-oriented programme similar to the one proposed by our team. The use of contemporary training aids should be utilized in training of every surgical skill, not only laparoscopy. This form of training, associated with the component of competition, enables good and stable results to be achieved, as well as high satisfaction of trainees.
    Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques / Wideochirurgia i Inne Techniki Malo Inwazyjne 09/2013; 8(3):200-210. DOI:10.5114/wiitm.2011.33756 · 1.09 Impact Factor
Show more