Article

[Radiotherapy in stage I testicular seminoma: retrospective study and review of literature].

Service de radiothérapie et oncologie, HIA du Val-de-Grâce, 74, boulevard du Port-Royal, 75005 Paris, France.
Cancer/Radiothérapie (impact factor: 1.49). 01/2004; 7(6):386-94.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Seminoma accounts for about 40% of germ cell tumours of the testicle. In this retrospective analysis, we review literature concerning management of stage I seminoma.
Between March 1987 and April 2001, 65 patients with stage I pure testicular seminoma received adjuvant radiotherapy with a 25 MV linear accelerator.
Median age was 33 years. Testicular tumour has been found on the right testis in 39 patients and on the left one in 24 patients. Patients have been treated using an anterior-posterior parallel pair and have received 20-25 Gy in 10-14 fractions. The target volume consisted of paraaortic, and paraaortic + homolateral iliac lymph nodes in 17 and 46 patients, respectively. Acute toxicity was mainly digestive, 38% of patients presenting nausea and vomiting. Median follow-up time was 37 months. All patients are alive in complete remission.
Because of good radio-sensitivity of seminoma, radiotherapy is regarded as standard adjuvant treatment (5 years relapse rate: 3-5%). Acute toxicity is dominated by moderate gastro-intestinal side effects. Secondary neoplasia represents one of the worst possible long-term complications of therapy. Waiting for ongoing randomised trials, the modern literature for seminoma reflects a trend toward lower radiation doses (20-25 Gy) and smaller treatment volumes (paraaortic field). Adjuvant chemotherapy with two courses of carboplatin, might be equivalent to radiotherapy but must be investigated in randomised trials. A surveillance policy is one of the other management options less recommended.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
26 Views
  • Source
    Article: Clinical stage I seminoma: the case for surveillance.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We believe that active surveillance is the optimal choice for compliant men who are able to handle the mental burden of not receiving adjuvant treatment. This takes into consideration the fact that a small number of men with clinical stage I (CSI) seminoma on surveillance will recur but are salvageable with equivalent outcome compared to those having adjuvant treatment which exposes eight in ten men to unnecessary short- and long-term risks with still the possibility of recurrence requiring salvation. This review will focus on CSI seminoma and the controversies surrounding its treatment and based upon current available evidence will outline the case for surveillance.
    World Journal of Urology 07/2009; 27(4):433-9. · 2.41 Impact Factor

Keywords

24 patients
 
25 MV linear accelerator
 
39 patients
 
46 patients
 
5 years relapse rate
 
65 patients
 
Adjuvant chemotherapy
 
germ cell tumours
 
good radio-sensitivity
 
lower radiation doses
 
management options
 
Median follow-up time
 
moderate gastro-intestinal side effects
 
ongoing randomised trials
 
paraaortic + homolateral iliac lymph nodes
 
retrospective analysis
 
smaller treatment volumes
 
standard adjuvant treatment
 
target volume
 
worst possible long-term complications