Carotid artery stenosis: grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis--Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference.

Department of Radiology, University of Southern California (USC), Keck School of Medicine, USC University Hospital, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Ultrasound Quarterly (Impact Factor: 1.4). 12/2003; 19(4):190-8. DOI: 10.1097/00013644-200312000-00005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts in the field of vascular ultrasonography (US) to come to a consensus regarding Doppler US for assistance in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. The panel's consensus statement is believed to represent a reasonable position on the basis of analysis of available literature and panelists' experience. Key elements of the statement include the following: First, all internal carotid artery (ICA) examinations should be performed with grayscale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler US. Second, the degree of stenosis determined at grayscale and Doppler US should be stratified into the categories of normal (no stenosis), less than 50% stenosis, 50 to 69% stenosis, > or =70% stenosis to near occlusion, near occlusion, and total occlusion. Third, ICA peak systolic velocity (PSV) and the presence of plaque on grayscale and/or color Doppler images are primarily used in the diagnosis and grading of ICA stenosis. Two additional parameters (the ICA-to-common carotid artery PSV ratio and ICA end diastolic velocity) may also be used when clinical or technical factors raise concern that ICA PSV may not be representative of the extent of disease. Fourth, ICA should be diagnosed as normal when ICA PSV is less than 125 cm/second and no plaque or intimal thickening is visible, less than 50% stenosis when ICA PSV is less than 125 cm/second and plaque or intimal thickening is visible, 50 to 69% stenosis when ICA PSV is 125 to 230 cm/second and plaque is visible, > or =70% stenosis to near occlusion when ICA PSV is more than 230 cm/second and visible plaque and lumen narrowing are seen, near occlusion when there is a markedly narrowed lumen on color Doppler US, and total occlusion when there is no detectable patent lumen on grayscale US and no flow on spectral, power, and color Doppler US. Fifth, the final report should discuss velocity measurements and grayscale and color Doppler findings. Study limitations should be noted when they exist. The conclusion should state an estimated degree of ICA stenosis as reflected in these categories. The panel also considered various technical aspects of carotid US and methods for quality assessment, and identified several important unanswered questions meriting future research.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Innerhalb der letzten 10–15 Jahre hat die Duplexsonographie durch ihre vergleichsweise einfache Technik und ihre hohe Validität (Sensitivität und Spezifität bei Beinvenenthrombose >90%) invasive Verfahren bei Venenerkrankungen fast vollständig verdrängt. Auch in der Diagnostik von Stenosen der extrakraniellen hirnversorgenden Gefäße muss zur Abschätzung des Stenosegrads (Treffsicherheit bei höhergradigen Stenosen >90%) sowie der Indikationsstellung für rekonstruktive Maßnahmen nur in Ausnahmefällen auf die Angiographie zurückgegriffen werden. Dennoch bleibt die Frage des vulnerablen Plaques sowie dessen Erkennbarkeit in bildgebenden Verfahren bei Karotisstenose ein kontrovers diskutiertes Thema, vornehmlich bedingt durch methodenspezifische Probleme.
    Gefässchirurgie 08/2008; 13(4). · 0.24 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite a decline during the recent decades in stroke-related death, the incidence of stroke has remained unchanged or slightly increased, and extracranial carotid artery stenosis is implicated in 20%-30% of all strokes. Medical therapy and risk factor modification are first-line therapies for all patients with carotid occlusive disease. Evidence for the treatment of patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis greater than 70% with either carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is compelling, and several trials have demonstrated a benefit to carotid revascularization in the symptomatic patient population. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis is more controversial, with the largest trials only demonstrating a 1% per year risk stroke reduction with CEA. Although there are sufficient data to advocate for aggressive medical therapy as the primary mode of treatment for asymptomatic carotid stenosis, there are also data to suggest that certain patient populations will benefit from a stroke risk reduction with carotid revascularization. In the United States, consensus and practice guidelines dictate that CEA is reasonable in patients with high-grade asymptomatic stenosis, a reasonable life expectancy, and perioperative risk of less than 3%. Regarding CAS versus CEA, the best-available evidence demonstrates no difference between the two procedures in early perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction, or death, and no difference in 4-year ipsilateral stroke risk. However, because of the higher perioperative risks of stroke in patients undergoing CAS, particularly in symptomatic, female, or elderly patients, it is difficult to recommend CAS over CEA except in populations with prohibitive cardiac risk, previous carotid surgery, or prior neck radiation. Current treatment paradigms are based on identifying the magnitude of perioperative risk in patient subsets and on using predictive factors to stratify patients with high-risk asymptomatic stenosis.
    Vascular Health and Risk Management 01/2014; 10:403-416.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this prospective study was to analyze the utility of a gray-scale median (GSM) system for identifying unstable plaques and to design and validate a prediction model for unstable plaques in symptomatic atheromatous carotid arteries. Fifty-two patients with non-cardioembolic cerebral infarction were included in the study. The receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed 76% sensitivity and 82% specificity for a GSM of 29 (p < 0.001) as a cutoff point for unstable plaques. A logistic regression model indicated that a GSM <29, male gender and not having been treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were independently associated with an unstable plaque classification. A probability model for unstable plaques was achieved by combining the strength of each variable (high blood pressure, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, previous stroke, anti-hypertensive drugs, calcium channel blockers, intima–media thickness). The model was tested with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (p < 0.001) and validated by the leave-one-out cross-validation method (p < 0.001). The prediction model based on a GSM <29, male gender and not having been treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors resulted in a probable unstable plaque assessment.
    Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 09/2014; · 2.10 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 3, 2014