Article

Carotid artery stenosis: grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis--Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference.

Department of Radiology, University of Southern California (USC), Keck School of Medicine, USC University Hospital, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Ultrasound Quarterly (Impact Factor: 1.4). 12/2003; 19(4):190-8. DOI: 10.1097/00013644-200312000-00005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts in the field of vascular ultrasonography (US) to come to a consensus regarding Doppler US for assistance in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. The panel's consensus statement is believed to represent a reasonable position on the basis of analysis of available literature and panelists' experience. Key elements of the statement include the following: First, all internal carotid artery (ICA) examinations should be performed with grayscale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler US. Second, the degree of stenosis determined at grayscale and Doppler US should be stratified into the categories of normal (no stenosis), less than 50% stenosis, 50 to 69% stenosis, > or =70% stenosis to near occlusion, near occlusion, and total occlusion. Third, ICA peak systolic velocity (PSV) and the presence of plaque on grayscale and/or color Doppler images are primarily used in the diagnosis and grading of ICA stenosis. Two additional parameters (the ICA-to-common carotid artery PSV ratio and ICA end diastolic velocity) may also be used when clinical or technical factors raise concern that ICA PSV may not be representative of the extent of disease. Fourth, ICA should be diagnosed as normal when ICA PSV is less than 125 cm/second and no plaque or intimal thickening is visible, less than 50% stenosis when ICA PSV is less than 125 cm/second and plaque or intimal thickening is visible, 50 to 69% stenosis when ICA PSV is 125 to 230 cm/second and plaque is visible, > or =70% stenosis to near occlusion when ICA PSV is more than 230 cm/second and visible plaque and lumen narrowing are seen, near occlusion when there is a markedly narrowed lumen on color Doppler US, and total occlusion when there is no detectable patent lumen on grayscale US and no flow on spectral, power, and color Doppler US. Fifth, the final report should discuss velocity measurements and grayscale and color Doppler findings. Study limitations should be noted when they exist. The conclusion should state an estimated degree of ICA stenosis as reflected in these categories. The panel also considered various technical aspects of carotid US and methods for quality assessment, and identified several important unanswered questions meriting future research.

4 Followers
 · 
496 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The relationships between cerebral and systemic endothelial (dys)function and between cerebral (dys)function and intima-media thickness (IMT) of carotid arteries in patients and healthy volunteers have not yet been clarified. In order to explore these issues, the authors performed a post hoc correlation analysis of cerebrovascular reactivity to L-arginine, a marker of cerebral endothelial function; flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), a marker of systemic endothelial function; and IMT of the carotid arteries, a marker of the extent of atherosclerosis. Correlations were analyzed in a heterogeneous group consisting of 20 patients with lacunar infarctions (LIs) and extensively impaired endothelial function, 21 patients with similar risk factors (SRs), but without LIs, and 21 healthy controls. Cerebrovascular reactivity to L-arginine was determined by the transcranial Doppler method (TCD), FMD by ultrasound measurements of the brachial artery after hyperemia, and IMT by measurement of the common carotid arteries. Analysis of correlations in the group of 62 subjects revealed that L-arginine reactivity, which was diminished in LI and SR patients, did not correlate with FMD, which was also diminished in both LI and SR patients (Rho = 0.10 with p = 0.458). On the contrary, a significant negative correlation was found between L-arginine reactivity and IMT (Rho = -0.30 with p = 0.015). In conclusion, our study investigating relations between cerebral and systemic endothelial dysfunction showed that cerebral endothelial function, determined by L-arginine reactivity, correlates well with the degree of atherosclerosis determined by IMT but does not correlate with FMD, suggesting that cerebral and systemic endothelial function may not be closely associated.
    Endothelium 07/2009; 14(2):73-80. DOI:10.1080/10623320701346692 · 1.91 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease. We have evaluated the degree of erythrocyte aggregation (EA) as a microinflammatory biomarker in a cohort of hospital-based, neurologically asymptomatic outpatients. The degree of EA and carotid artery stenosis was evaluated in 510 individuals by using a simple slide test and image analysis. Results: Four hundred and sixteen individuals had minimal carotid stenosis (< 30%); 47 had mild to moderate stenosis (30-69%) and 47 had severe stenosis (> 70%). A significant correlation was noted between the degree of carotid stenosis and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), white blood cell count (WBCC) and fibrinogen (r=0.160, p=0.005; r=0.191, p=0.001 and r=0.126, p=0.026, respectively). The significant correlation was noted between the degree of carotid stenosis and EA (r=0.209, p< 0.001). The subjects with severe stenosis differed significantly from the other groups in their ESR, WBCC and EA. High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) concentrations did not discriminate between the presence and absence of significant carotid atherosclerotic disease. Inflammatory biomarkers such as ESR and the EA test are more sensitive than hs-CRP to the presence of a significant atherosclerotic carotid burden. These biomarkers might aid in the detection and quantification of microinflammation in individuals with carotid atherosclerosis.
    Disease markers 01/2008; 24(1):33-9. DOI:10.1155/2008/184647 · 2.17 Impact Factor
  • Source