Article

A randomized trial comparing initial HAART regimens of nelfinavir/nevirapine and ritonavir/saquinavir in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Department of Infectious Diseases, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Antiviral therapy (Impact Factor: 3.07). 12/2003; 8(6):595-602.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A triple-class HAART regimen may be associated with a better virological effect than conventional regimens, but may also lead to toxicity and more profound resistance.
Randomized, controlled, open-label trial of 233 protease inhibitor- and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-naive HIV-infected patients allocated to a regimen of nelfinavir and nevirapine (1250/200 mg twice daily; n = 118) or ritonavir and saquinavir (400/400 mg twice daily; n = 115), both in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The primary end-point was HIV RNA < or = 20 copies/ml after 48 weeks (missing value = failure). Patients remained under follow-up also in case of switch from the randomized therapy.
At baseline, the median CD4 cell counts were 126 (range: 0-942) (nelfinavir/nevirapine) and 150 (0-642) (ritonavir/saquinavir) cells/mm3, and HIV RNA measurements 5.0 copies/ml (1.3-6.4) in both groups. A total of 102 (86%) and 101 (88%) were antiretroviral-naive. 44% discontinued randomized therapy; P = 0.13. Of these, 80 and 73% switched therapy due to adverse events; P = 0.99. At week 48, 69 and 56%, respectively, had a HIV RNA < or = 20 copies/ml; P = 0.037.
A regimen of nelfinavir/nevirapine had a favourable virological effect and tolerability over a 48-week period compared with ritonavir/saquinavir, when administered in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. However, more extensive follow-up is required to determine the long-term consequences of triple class HAART regimens, including the development of broad drug resistance.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
69 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nelfinavir (Viracept) is an orally administered protease inhibitor. In combination with other antiretroviral drugs (usually nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTIs]), nelfinavir produces substantial and sustained reductions in viral load in patients with HIV infection. Nelfinavir may be used in the treatment of adults, adolescents and children aged >or=2 years with HIV infection. It can also be used in pregnancy. Resistance to nelfinavir may develop, but the most common mutation (D30N, appearing mainly in HIV-1 subtype B) does not confer resistance to other protease inhibitors, thereby conserving these agents for later use. Although less effective than lopinavir/ritonavir, the preferred first-line treatment in US guidelines, nelfinavir is positioned as an alternative agent for the treatment of adults and adolescents with HIV infection and is an option for those unable to tolerate other protease inhibitors. Nelfinavir also has a role in the management of pregnant patients as well as paediatric patients with HIV infection.
    Drugs 02/2005; 65(15):2209-44. · 4.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    AIDS (London, England) 09/2012; 26(15):1974-1977. · 4.91 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background We assessed whether quadruple or triple-class therapy for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection provides a virological benefit over standard triple therapy in patients with a very high plasma viraemia.Design National observational HIV cohort in the Netherlands.Methods Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, treatment-naïve, plasma viral load (pVL) ≥500.000 copies/ml and initiation of quadruple or triple therapy between 2001-2011. Time to viral suppression, defined as pVL <50 c/ml, was compared between the two groups using Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariate Cox regression analysis.Results 675 patients were included: 125 (19%) initiated quadruple and 550 (81%) triple therapy. Median pVL was 5.9 (IQR 5.8-6.1) log(10) c/ml in both groups (P=0.49). 22 (18%) patients on quadruple and 63 (12%) on triple therapy interrupted the treatment regimen because of drug-related toxicity (P=0.06). Median time to viral suppression was 5.8 (IQR 4.6-7.9) and 6.0 (4.0-9.4) months in the patients on quadruple and triple therapy (log rank, P=0.42). In the adjusted Cox analysis, quadruple therapy was not associated with time to viral suppression (HR 1.07 (95% CI 0.86-1.33), P=0.53). Similar results were seen when comparing triple- versus dual-class therapy (n=72 vs. n=601, respectively).Conclusions Initial quadruple or triple-class therapy was equally effective as standard triple therapy in the suppression of HIV-1 in treatment-naïve patients with very high viraemia and did not result in a faster pVL decline, but did expose patients to additional toxicity.
    Antiviral therapy 08/2012; · 3.07 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
15 Downloads
Available from
May 28, 2014