Article

The incidence of treated end-stage renal disease in New Zealand Maori and Pacific Island people and in Indigenous Australians.

Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (Impact Factor: 3.37). 04/2004; 19(3):678-85. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfg592
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although Indigenous Australians, New Zealand Maori and Pacific Island people comprise an unduly high proportion of patients treated for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the two countries, no population-based age- and disease-specific rates have been published.
From data provided to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), truncated age- and sex-standardized incidence rates were calculated for treated ESRD due to all causes and by primary renal disease, in four broad age groups of Maori, Pacific Island people and all 'other' New Zealanders and Indigenous and non-indigenous Australians, for the period 1992-2001.
The incidence of ESRD did not differ in persons aged 0-14 years. In adults, Maori and Pacific Island people had similar rates of ESRD, a little more than half those of Indigenous Australians except in persons aged 65 years and over in whom the rates were nearly equal, but two to ten times the rates in 'other' New Zealanders and non-indigenous Australians. The excess of ESRD in Indigenous Australians was due principally to type II diabetic nephropathy and glomerulonephritis (all common types except lupus nephritis), but was seen also in respect of type I diabetic nephropathy, hypertensive renal disease and analgesic nephropathy, while the excess in Maori and Pacific Island people was confined to type II diabetic nephropathy, hypertensive renal disease and glomerulonephritis (especially lupus nephritis and type I mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis, but not mesangial IgA disease).
The incidence and pattern of treated ESRD differs quantitatively and qualitatively between Maori, Pacific Island people and other New Zealanders, and Indigenous and non-indigenous Australians.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
69 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Whilst increasing numbers of elderly people in Australia are commencing dialysis, few Indigenous patients are aged ≥65 years and their outcomes are unknown. We compared the long-term survival, mortality hazards and causes of death between elderly Indigenous and elderly non-Indigenous dialysis patients.
    Nephrology 07/2014; · 1.69 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose A previous clinical trial showed that radiologic insertion of first peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters by modified Seldinger technique is noninferior to laparoscopic surgery in patients at low risk in a clinical trial setting. The present cohort study was performed to confirm clinical effectiveness of radiologic insertion in everyday practice, including insertion in patients with expanded eligibility criteria and by fellows in training. Materials and Methods Between 2004 and 2009, 286 PD catheters were inserted in 249 patients, 133 with fluoroscopic guidance in the radiology department and 153 by laparoscopic surgery. Survival analyses were performed with the primary outcome of complication-free catheter survival and secondary outcomes of overall catheter survival and patient survival. Outcomes were assessed at last follow-up, as long as 365 days after PD catheter insertion. Results In the radiologic group, unadjusted 365-day complication-free catheter, overall catheter, and patient survival rates were 22.6%, 81.2%, and 82.7%, respectively, compared with 22.9% (P = .52), 76.5% (P = .4), and 92.8% (P = .01), respectively, in the laparoscopic group. Frequencies of individual complications were similar between groups. Adjusting for patient age, comorbidity, and previous PD catheter, the hazard ratio (HR) for catheter complications by radiologic versus laparoscopic insertion is 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62–1.31); the HR for overall catheter survival is 1.25 (95% CI, 0.59–2.65); and that for death is 2.47 (95% CI, 0.84–7.3). Conclusions Radiologic PD catheter insertion is a clinically effective alternative to laparoscopic surgery, although there was poorer long-term survival with radiologic catheter placement, possibly because of preferential selection of radiologic insertion for more frail patients.
    Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR 01/2014; · 1.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Racial disparities in transplantation rates and outcomes have not been investigated in detail for NZ, a country with unique demographics. We studied a retrospective cohort of 215 patients <18 yr who started renal replacement therapy in NZ 1990–2012, using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA). Primary outcomes were time to first kidney transplant, death-censored graft survival, and retransplantation after loss of primary graft. Europeans and Asians were most likely to receive a transplant (92% and 91% transplanted within five yr, respectively), and Pacific and Māori patients were less likely to receive a transplant than Europeans (51% and 46%, respectively), reflecting disparities in live donor transplantation. Pacific patients were more likely to have glomerulonephritis and FSGS. Pacific patients had five-yr death-censored graft survival of 31%, lower than Māori (61%) and Europeans (88%). No Pacific patients who lost their grafts were re-transplanted within 72 patient-years of follow-up, whereas 14% of Māori patients and 36% of European and Asian patients were retransplanted within five yr. Current programs to improve live and deceased donation within Māori and Pacific people and management of recurrent kidney disease are likely to reduce these disparities.
    Pediatric Transplantation 07/2014; · 1.50 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
2 Downloads