Effects of low dose ramipril on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and raised excretion of urinary albumin: randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial (the DIABHYCAR study)

Technische Universität München, München, Bavaria, Germany
BMJ (online) (Impact Factor: 16.38). 03/2004; 328(7438):495. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.37970.629537.0D
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To investigate whether a low dose of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril lowers cardiovascular and renal events in patients with type 2 diabetes who have microalbuminuria or proteinuria.
Randomised, double blind, parallel group trial comparing ramipril (1.25 mg/day) with placebo (on top of usual treatment) for cardiovascular and renal outcomes for at least three years.
Multicentre, primary care study conducted mostly by general practitioners in 16 European and north African countries.
4912 patients with type 2 diabetes aged >50 years who use oral antidiabetic drugs and have persistent microalbuminuria or proteinuria (urinary albumin excretion > or = 20 mg/l in two consecutive samples), and serum creatinine < or = 150 micromol/l.
The primary outcome measure was the combined incidence of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure leading to hospital admission, and end stage renal failure.
Participants were followed for 3 to 6 (median 4) years. There were 362 primary events among the 2443 participants taking ramipril (37.8 per 1000 patient years) and 377 events among the 2469 participants taking placebo (38.8 per 1000 patient years; hazard ratio 1.03 (95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.20, P = 0.65)). None of the components of the primary outcome was reduced. Ramipril lowered systolic and diastolic blood pressures (by 2.43 and 1.06 mm Hg respectively after two years) and favoured regression from microalbuminuria (20-200 mg/l) or proteinuria (> 200mg/l) to normal level (< 20 mg/l) or microalbuminuria (P < 0.07) in 1868 participants who completed the study.
Low dose (1.25 mg) ramipril once daily has no effect on cardiovascular and renal outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria, despite a slight decrease in blood pressure and urinary albumin. The cardiovascular benefits of a daily higher dose (10 mg) ramipril observed elsewhere are not found with an eightfold lower daily dose.

Download full-text


Available from: Johannes F E Mann, Jul 04, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The PREVEND IT trial reported on a high cardiovascular (CV) event rate in subjects with a baseline urinary albumin excretion (UAE) rate of ≥ 50 mg/24 h. Here, we report on the observed 10-year CV outcome of this population and compare this with the predicted Framingham Risk Score (FRS). In addition, we evaluated the effect of four years of fosinopril treatment on this relation. Methods and results From the PREVEND IT cohort, 833 subjects without history of CV disease, randomized to fosinopril (N = 412) or placebo (N = 421), were studied. The primary endpoint included CV mortality and adjudicated hospitalization for CV disease during a 10-year follow-up period. Mean age was 51 ± 12 years and 65% were males, while prevalence of diabetes (2.6%) and use of CV drugs (3.5%) was low. Subjects were categorized to high UAE (≥ 50 mg/24 h) or low UAE (< 50 mg/24 h). After 10 years of follow-up, the event rate in the high UAE group was almost twice as high as predicted by the FRS (29.5% vs. 17.2%). Treatment for four years with fosinopril reduced the event rate to comparable levels of that predicted by FRS. The addition of UAE ≥ 50 mg/24 h to the FRS improved the Integrated Discrimination Improvement (P = 0.033) and increased the area under the curve by 0.54% (P = 0.024). Conclusions The 10-year CV risk of subjects with an elevated UAE (≥ 50 mg/24 h) is substantially underestimated by the FRS. Treatment with fosinopril successfully reduced this increased event rate to FRS-predicted CV risk.
    04/2014; 4. DOI:10.1016/j.ijchv.2014.04.004
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stroke is the leading cause of serious long-term disability and the third leading cause of death in the Western world. In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), stroke and vascular dementia are significantly more prevalent than in the general population. However, the optimal stroke prevention strategy in these patients is unclear, because controlled studies are scarce. In this paper, the results of the major antihypertensive trials and meta-analyses for stroke prevention in the general high cardiovascular (CV) risk population and in the CKD population are reviewed. The risk of stroke is much more blood pressure (BP)-dependent than the risk of other CV events, and, consistently, risk reduction is also strongly dependent on BP reduction. The magnitude of BP lowering is crucial in both populations. In renal patients, diuretics alone or in combination with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, compared with placebo, are powerful BP-lowering and stroke-protective agents. Calcium channel blockers and ACE inhibitors also seem to be superior to placebo, but with more modest BP-decreasing effects and statistically nonsignificant reductions in stroke risk. In active versus active drug studies, independently of the BP-lowering effect, there are no significant advantages of any class over the others, although the results point to a slight superiority of diuretics and calcium channel blockers. Antihypertensive regimens in CKD patients should always include a diuretic, because, in the pathogenesis of CKD-associated hypertension, volume overload plays a crucial role. Diuretics are also inexpensive and well tolerated. We suggest that further studies of CV outcomes in CKD patients should compare various combinations of diuretics plus other drugs, such as calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers.
    Journal of nephrology 21(3):374-83. · 2.00 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Honors thesis--Harvard University, 1937.