The purpose of this paper is to review three cultural concepts (acculturation, ethnic identity, bicultural self-efficacy) and their relationship to the known risk and protective factors associated with youth violence. We conducted a review of the relevant literature that addresses these three cultural concepts and the relationship among culture, violent behavior, and associated cognition. The available literature suggests that ethnic identity and bicultural self-efficacy can be best thought of as protective factors, whereas acculturation can be a potential risk factor for youth violence. We examine the connection between these cultural concepts and the risk and protective factors described in the 2001 Surgeon General's Report on Youth Violence, and present a summary table with cultural risk and protective factors for violence prevention. These concepts can assist physicians in identifying risk and protective factors for youth violence when working with multicultural adolescents and their families. Physicians are more effective at providing appropriate referrals if they are aware that navigating among different cultures influences adolescent behavior.
"In a review of studies of the relations between acculturation and interpersonal and self-directed violence among adolescents from minority groups in the United States, Smokowski et al  identified a link between assimilation and youth violence, as violence was most prevalent among youths who were disconnected from their culture. This finding is consistent with evidence that acculturation is a risk factor for aggression  and that strong ethnic identity is a protective factor . Among the various groups, Smokowski et al  found that American Indian and Alaskan Native adolescents were at higher statistical risk for various types of aggression when compared with other minority groups. "
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Minority youth in general, and Aboriginal youth in particular, are at increased statistical risk for being perpetrators or victims of aggression.
We examined the potential protective aspect of cultural identity in relation to peer ratings of physical and relational aggression and factors typically associated with each among almost the entire cohort of Naskapi youths from Kawawachikamach, Québec.
Hierarchical multiple regressions revealed that a strong identity with their own Native culture predicted less perceived physical and social aggression by their peers.
These findings are discussed in the context of the role of a positive affiliation with ancestral culture for the diminishment of adolescent aggression and for general adaptive development and well-being.
Journal of Adolescent Health 08/2011; 49(2):155-9. DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.11.245 · 3.61 Impact Factor
"Although operating in different cultures may result in bicultural stress if there are clashing values and self-concepts across those cultures (Smith, 1989), Berry (1998) argued that bicultural individuals may benefit from operating in and valuing both cultures rather than choosing one or the other. The positive benefit of a bicultural self for African Americans is supported in research (Bell, 1990; Soriano et al., 2004). "
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Scholarship is emerging on intervention models that purposefully attend to cultural variables throughout the career assessment and career counseling process (Swanson & Fouad, in press). One heuristic model that offers promise to advance culturally-relevant vocational practice with African Americans is the Outline for Cultural Formulation (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). This article explicates the Outline for Cultural Formulation in career assessment and career counseling with African Americans integrating the concept of cultural identity into the entire model. The article concludes with an illustration of the Outline for Cultural Formulation model with an African American career client.
Journal of Career Development 06/2010; 37(1):441-464. DOI:10.1177/0894845309345847 · 1.52 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.