Article

Determination of carbamate pesticide residues in vegetables and fruits by liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure photoionization-mass spectrometry and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-mass spectrometry.

Yokogawa Analytical Systems Inc, 3-3-11 Niitaka, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka 532-0033, Japan.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (Impact Factor: 3.11). 03/2004; 52(4):727-35. DOI: 10.1021/jf0343377
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI)-mass spectrometry method was developed for the determination of 22 carbamates including their metabolites in vegetables and fruits. For the optimization of APPI, several APPI ion source parameters were examined. As a result, many carbamates with APPI using the optimized parameter gave simple mass spectra, and a strong signal corresponding to [M + H](+) was observed except for aldicarb. However, some carbamate metabolites gave ammonium adduct ions [M + NH(4)](+) as base peak ions. The mean recovery of each carbamate from grape and onion samples spiked at 5 ng/g was 81.7-105.7%, with relative standard deviations of 3.3-5.9%. Furthermore, matrix constituents did not significantly influence the ionization efficiency. The limit of detection (S/N = 3) in grape and onion was in the range of 0.33-3.33 ng/g. For the robustness of this method, this system has been used to analyze 50 samples, and the intensities for all carbamates were found to be unaffected by the contamination of the APPI source by sample matrix constituents. This result indicates that the method is reliable.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
68 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reversed electrode polarity stacking mode (REPSM) coupled to micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) was employed for the simultaneous determination of carbamate insecticide residues in fruit juice samples. A mixture of the studied insecticides (i.e., methomyl, propoxur, carbofuran, carbaryl, isoprocarb, and promecarb) in 10 mmol L−1 phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) was introduced into the capillary tube by hydrodynamic injection at 0.5 psi for 30 s followed by removal of the sample matrix at −15 kV for 0.5 min. The analytes were successfully separated within 8 min using 10 mmol L−1 borate buffer containing 60 mmol L−1 sodium dodecyl sulfate at pH 9.5, and photodiode array detection at 205, 214, and 225 nm. The REPSM–MEKC gave stacking enhancement factors of about 4–13, compared to that without stacking. The limits of detection were in the range 0.01–0.10 mg L−1, which is acceptable with respect to the maximum residue limits. Good precisions were obtained with relative standard deviation lower than 1.8% (for migration time) and 10% (for peak area). The recoveries for most fruit juice samples were acceptable (>80%). No contamination of the studied carbamates was observed in any sample. The proposed method is simple and effective for preconcentration and removal of matrix interferences in a single step for the determination of the studied carbamate insecticides.
    Food Analytical Methods 02/2011; · 1.97 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A simple and sensitive liquid chromatographic (LC) method was developed for determination of carbaryl residue in buffalo meat samples. This method is based on a solid-phase extraction technique followed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)–photo-diode-array (PDA) detection. Meat samples (0.5 g) were deproteinized by adding acetonitrile followed by centrifugation and filtration. The analyte was separated on a reverse-phase (RP-C18) column using isocratic elution. Acetonitrile along with water appears to be an excellent extractant as recovery of the analyte in spiked sample at maximum residue level (MRL) was 98.5%, with coefficient of variation (CV) of 4.97%. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of the method was 0.015 and 0.03 μg g−1, respectively. The linearity of the carbaryl was 0.9992. Excellent method repeatability and reproducibility were also observed by intra- and inter-day assay precision. For robustness, the method was employed to analyze 122 buffalo meat samples, and intensities for the insecticide were found to be unaffected by the sample matrices interference.
    Analytical methods 01/2010; 2(4). · 1.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ziel und HintergrundGestiegene Anforderungen an analytische Methoden seitens der Zulassungsbehörden einerseits und die Notwendigkeit zur Kostensenkung durch kürzere Entwicklungszeiten andererseits führen dazu, dass bei der industriellen Entwicklung neuer Pflanzenschutzmittel (PSM) die Kopplung von Hochleistungsflüssigkeits-chromatographie (HPLC) mit der Tandem-Massenspektrometrie (MS/MS) unter Verwendung der Ionisation bei Atmosphärendruck (API) seit Mitte der 1990er Jahre herkömmliche Methoden wie GC-MS oder HPLC-UV in der Rückstandsanalytik zunehmend verdrängt. Erste Impulse für diese Entwicklung kamen aus der Pharmaindustrie, die bereits Ende der 1980er Jahre HPLC-MS/MS zur Quantifizierung von Wirkstoffen und deren Abbauprodukten in Plasma einzusetzen begann. MethodenDie Ursachen für die hohe Akzeptanz der HPLC-MS/MS mit Elektrospray-Ionisation (ESI) oder chemischer Ionisation bei Atmosphärendruck (APCI) gegenüber alternativen Bestimmungsmethoden werden anhand analytischer Güteparameter, Übereinstimmung mit internationalen Zulassungsrichtlinien und betriebswirtschaftlicher Belange begründet. Ergebnisse und SchlussfolgerungenModerne rückstandsanalytische Laboratorien bearbeiten schon heute rund 75% aller analytischen Problemstellungen mittels HPLC-MS/MS. Für die Bestimmung der meisten PSM und deren Abbauprodukte (Metaboliten) in unterschiedlichsten Probenmatrizes bieter die HPLC-MS/MS-Kopplungstechnik entscheidende Vorteile. Hierzu zählen eine reduzierte oder der Verzicht auf eine Aufreinigung (Clean-up) nach der Extraktion des Probenmaterials, hoher Probendurchsatz bei geringer Störanfälligkeit, hohe Nachweisstärke und ein großer linearer Messbereich. Darüber hinaus können mehrere Analyten unterschiedlichster Verbindungsklassen in einem chromatographischen Lauf bestimmt werden. Wegen der hohen Selektivität sind nur in Ausnahmefällen noch zusätzliche Absicherungsverfahren notwendig. In der amtlichen Überwachung ist die HPLC-MS/MS-Kopplungstechnik erst seit Mitte 2002 als Methode zugelassen. Bisher haben nur wenige staatliche Untersuchungsstellen in diese Technologie investiert; die Gründe dafür sind in erster Linie die hohen Kosten für die Geräte und für das Vorhalten des erforderlichen qualifizierten Personals. Empfehlung und AusblickDer Anteil der HPLC-MS/MS zur Lösung rückstandsanalytischer Fragestellungen wird weiter zunehmen, da neue Ionisierungstechniken auch bisher schwierig analysierbare Stoffklassen erschließen und die Investitionskosten bei zunehmender Leistungsfähigkeit der Geräte sinken. Dennoch wird es auch weiterhin für die sog. klassischen Analysenmethoden Nischenplätze geben. Ganz im Sinne einer Probendurchsatzsteigerung könnten Konzepte, wie z.B. parallele HPLC-MS/MS und/oder Online-Aufreinigung von Extrakten über Säulenschaltungen, sein, die bereits seit Längerem in der Pharmaindustrie Verwendung finden und weiter zunehmen dürften. Für eine fundierte Bewertung der hier vorgestellten Technik bezüglich ihrer Eignung in der Rückstandsanalytik liegen allerdings noch zu wenig Erfahrungen vor. Goal and ScopeIncreasing demands from the regulatory authorities of plant protection products for residue analytical methods on the one hand and the need for cost reduction by shorter development times on the other hand have led to a significant displacement of conventional methods (e.g. HPLC-UV or GC-MS) by HPLC-MS/MS with atmospheric pressure ionization (API) in residue analysis since the mid of the 1990s. This development started in the pharmaceutical industries where HPLC-MS/MS had already been used for the quantitation of drugs and their metabolites in plasma since the late 1980s. MethodsThe reason for the high acceptability of HPLC-MS/MS with electrospray ionisation (ESI) or chemical ionization at atmosheric pressure (APCI) compared with alternative methods are shown with respect to analytical quality parameters, compliance with international registration guidelines and economic reasons. Results and ConclusionHPLC-MS/MS is being applied for solving ca. 75% of all analytical problems occuring in modern residue analytical laboratories. This technique offers convincing advantages for the determination of plant protection products and their metabolites in various matrices. These are a reduced number of or no clean-up steps after extraction of the samples, high throughput besides high ruggedness, low limits of detection and a large linear measuring range. In addition, several analytes of various chemical classes can be determined within one chromatographic run. Due to the high selectivity there is only little need for additional confirmatory methods. For enforcement purposes HPLC-MS/MS is accepted by the European authorities since 2002. However, due to high costs for instrumentation and specially skilled personnel only few enforcement laboratories have invested into this technology, so far. Recommendation and PerspectiveThe importance of HPLC-MS/MS in residue analysis will further increase, as new ionization techniques will enable the analysis of more analytes and as the investment costs will decrease in the future. However, proven conventional methods will still survive in some cases. New concepts, such as parallel HPLC-MS/MS or on-line purification of extracts by column switching which are already widely used in the pharmaceutical industry could help to further increase the throughput. However, for a sound evaluation with respect to their applicability in residue analysis there is so far too little experience. SchlagwörterFlüssigkeitschromatographie-Massenspektrometrie-Pflanzenschutzmittel-Rückstandsanalytik KeywordsLiquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-pesticides-plant protection products-residue analysis
    Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung 01/2006; 18(1):21-26.