Does pre-operative physiotherapy improve outcomes from lower limb joint replacement surgery? A systematic review.

School of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, 3010, Australia.
The Australian journal of physiotherapy (Impact Factor: 3.48). 02/2004; 50(1):25-30. DOI: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60245-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A systematic review of randomised controlled trials was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of pre-operative physiotherapy programmes on outcome following lower limb joint replacement surgery. A search of relevant key terms was used to find suitable trials, with five papers meeting the inclusion criteria for the review. The methodological quality of the trials was rated using the PEDro scale. Estimates of the size of treatment effects were calculated for each outcome in each trial, with 95% confidence intervals calculated where sufficient data were provided. Of the three trials pertaining to total knee replacement, only very small mean differences were found between control and intervention groups for all of the outcome measures. Where confidence intervals could be calculated, these showed no clinically important differences between the groups. Two papers (one study) pertaining to total hip replacements found significant improvements in WOMAC scores, hip strength and range of movement, walking distance, cadence, and gait velocity for the intervention group, compared to a control group. Estimates of treatment effect sizes for these outcomes were larger than for the total knee replacement studies, with confidence intervals showing potentially clinically important differences between group means. However, as the intervention group also received an additional intensive post-operative physiotherapy program, these results cannot be attributed solely to the pre-operative program. This systematic review shows that pre-operative physiotherapy programmes are not effective in improving outcome after total knee replacement but their effect on outcome from total hip replacement cannot be adequately determined.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of progressive resistance training (PRT) on muscle strength and functional capacity before and/or after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The effects of THA and TKA upon quality of life and the rate of adverse events were also investigated. DATA SOURCES: Literature from nine databases. REVIEW METHODS: Studies were included if 1) the effect of a PRT intervention was compared with no intervention or another type of intervention; 2) the outcomes included muscle strength and/or functional capacity; 3) all participants were scheduled for or had just undergone THA or TKA; 4) they were randomized, controlled trials (RCT); and 5) only full-length papers in English were studied. Data on patient characteristics, training regime, controls, and outcome measures were extracted. RESULTS: Four RCT studies on PRT and THA including 136 patients and three RCT studies on PRT and TKA including 284 patients were identified and rated according to the PEDro scale. The general methodological quality of the studies was low. No adverse events were reported in any of the studies. Weak evidence of a beneficial effect of PRT before and/or after THA on muscle strength and functional capacity was found. No effect of PRT before TKA on muscle strength and functional capacity was found. The results of postoperative PRT were too heterogeneous to allow conclusions. CONCLUSION: PRT is safe and feasible before and/or after THA. PRT is safe, but the methodological quality of existing evidence permits no conclusion on the effectiveness of PRT before and/or after TKA.
    Clin Rehabil. 07/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The number of total knee and hip arthroplasty is predicted to rise 174% and 673%, respectively, over the next 20 years due to the expected rise in the baby boomer population. Along with increased numbers or procedures performed is the rise in cost and potential medical complications from hospitalizations. The purpose of this study is to describe one rural hospital's facility‐wide procedure to streamline processes and standardize care without compromising patient medical needs prior to, and during, the acute phase of total knee and hip arthroplasty. Data were compared before and after the facility‐wide procedure was implemented. Results found shorter length of hospital stay and significantly more discharges directly home all without increasing medical complications after the facility‐wide procedure was implemented.
    Journal for Healthcare Quality 01/2014; 36(3).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Around 20% of knee replacement have an unsatisfactory outcome. Pre-operative physiotherapy and education have been proposed to improve post-operative outcomes. Objectives This systematic review evaluated whether these factors improved length of stay and patient reported outcomes after knee replacement surgery. Data sources Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO and PEDro were searched on the 1st January 2013. Study selection or eligibility criteria Randomised or quasi-randomised studies assessing either pre-operative education or physiotherapy on patients undergoing a planned total or partial knee replacement were included in the review. Only studies with a control group receiving a defined standard of pre-operative care were included. Results Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria set. Two studies analysed the effect of pre-operative education, seven pre-operative physiotherapy and two studies used both factors. No study found significant differences in validated joint specific patient reported outcome measures. The education studies found a decrease in pre-operative expectation and an improvement in knowledge, flexion and regularity of exercise. Two studies found an improvement in muscle strength in the physiotherapy group at three months. The combination of education and physiotherapy was shown to reduce patient length of stay and cost in one study. Conclusion The evidence reviewed is insufficient to support the implementation of either pre-operative education or physiotherapy programmes. The combination of pre-operative education and physiotherapy may reduce the medical costs associated with surgery. Funding No funding was received.
    Physiotherapy 01/2014; · 1.57 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 31, 2014