Chronic pancreatitis. The problems of diagnostic criteria.

Third Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Pancreatology (Impact Factor: 2.04). 02/2004; 4(1):28-41. DOI: 10.1159/000077066
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The diagnostic criteria for chronic pancreatitis proposed by the Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) classified chronic pancreatitis into (i) definite; (ii) probable, and (iii) possible chronic pancreatitis, excluding obstructive, inflammatory (autoimmune) and tumor-forming pancreatitis from the definition of chronic pancreatitis. In the JPS Criteria, imaging studies, pancreatic function tests, and histological findings are independent of each other, and thus the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis is made if one of the criteria is satisfied, regardless of the etiology of the chronic pancreatitis. The current diagnostic criteria for chronic pancreatitis depend on abnormalities of the duct system, such as low bicarbonate output, dilation of main pancreatic duct and duct branches, and calculi in the ducts by imaging studies. We revealed that the difference between reversible and irreversible pancreatitis in experimental animals is dependent on the degree of damage of the duct epithelium where pancreas progenitor cells exist. Thus, chronic pancreatitis diagnosed by the current criteria based on abnormalities of the duct system is irreversible. In contrast, the epithelium of the ducts is usually preserved in obstructive and autoimmune pancreatitis in that both structural and functional changes recover almost completely when the obstruction is removed or the inflammatory changes disappear following steroid administration. Even in chronic pancreatitis defined as irreversible, there must be a reversible stage during its clinical course. There is a need to develop biological markers and/or imaging procedure to detect chronic pancreatitis at its reversible stage.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a relatively uncommon, complex and highly heterogeneous disease. There is no clear pattern applicable to the initial stages of CP, which hampers its early diagnosis. Some of the complications of CP, especially chronic pain, can be difficult to manage. There is wide variation in the diagnosis and treatment of CP and its complications among centers and health professionals. The Spanish Pancreatic Club has developed a consensus document on the management of CP. Two coordinators chose a multidisciplinary panel of 24 experts in this disease. A list of questions was drawn up. Each question was reviewed by two experts. These questions were then used to produce a draft, which was discussed in a face-to-face meeting with all the participants. The first part of the consensus document focusses on the diagnosis of CP and its complications.
    Gastroenterología y Hepatología 04/2013; · 0.57 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose As laparoscopic cholecystectomy and liver transplantation (LT) have become more common, so has biliary stricture. Fortunately, endoscopic treatment has almost simultaneously been developed. This article reviews the recent reports concerning the management of benign biliary strictures (BBS). Methods The literature regarding the diagnosis and treatment of BBS is reviewed after an electronic search of PubMed from 1982 to 2009 was performed. Results Despite the existence of diagnostic tools including tumor markers, brush cytology, intraductal ultrasonography and other imaging modalities, differentiating BBS from malignant stricture remains challenging, as does differentiating IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis from other benign strictures. Endoscopic treatment with balloon dilation of the stricture and serial insertions of stents is the preferred initial treatment for BBS. However, the outcomes of endoscopic treatments for primary sclerosing cholangitis or chronic pancreatitis are poorer than those for post-surgical biliary stricture. When endoscopic treatments fail to repair complicated biliary strictures such as Bismuth types III, IV, and V, surgical repair is recommended. Among the non-anastomotic BBS, intrahepatic bilateral type strictures after LT may require repeat transplantation. Conclusion Early referral to tertiary centers with an alliance among hepatobiliary surgeons, interventional radiologists, and endoscopists is necessary to assure optimal results.
    Surgery Today 09/2012; 42(12). · 0.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives. The recent International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC) for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and its Japanese amendment developed by the Japanese Pancreas Society (JPS 2011) may have overcome the drawbacks of earlier criteria and achieved a higher diagnostic ability for AIP. The aim of the present study is to evaluate this possibility and identify the underlying causes of this change. Methods. We compared the diagnostic abilities of the ICDC and JPS 2011 with those of the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2006 (JPS 2006), Korean diagnostic criteria (Korean), Asian diagnostic criteria (Asian), and HISORt diagnostic criteria in 110 patients with AIP and 31 patients with malignant pancreatic cancer. Results. The ICDC achieved the highest diagnostic ability in terms of accuracy (95.0%), followed by JPS 2011 (92.9%), Korean (92.2%), HISORt (88.7%), Asian (87.2%), and JPS 2006 (85.1%). Nearly all criteria systems exhibited a high specificity of 100%, indicating that the enhanced diagnostic ability of the ICDC and JPS 2011 likely stemmed from increased sensitivity brought about by inclusion of diagnostic items requiring no endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. The diagnostic ability of JPS 2011 was nearly equivalent to that of the ICDC. Conclusions. The ICDC and JPS 2011 have improved diagnostic ability as compared with earlier criteria sets because of an increase in sensitivity.
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice 01/2013; 2013:456965. · 1.62 Impact Factor