Determinants of innovation within health care organizations - Literature review and Delphi study

TNO Prevention and Health, Leiden, The Netherlands.
International Journal for Quality in Health Care (Impact Factor: 1.58). 05/2004; 16(2):107-23. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh030
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT When introducing innovations to health care, it is important to gain insight into determinants that may facilitate or impede the introduction, in order to design an appropriate strategy for introducing the innovation. To obtain an overview of determinants of innovations in health care organizations, we carried out a literature review and a Delphi study. The Delphi study was intended to achieve consensus among a group of implementation experts on determinants identified from the literature review.
We searched 11 databases for articles published between 1990 and 2000. The keywords varied according to the specific database. We also searched for free text. Forty-four implementation experts (implementation researchers, programme managers, and implementation consultants/advisors) participated in the Delphi study.
The following studies were selected: (i) studies describing innovation processes, and determinants thereof, in health care organizations; (ii) studies where the aim of the innovations was to change the behaviour of health professionals; (iii) studies where the health care organizations provided direct patient care; and (iv) studies where only empirical studies were included.
Two researchers independently selected the abstracts and analysed the articles. The determinants were divided into four categories: characteristics of the environment, characteristics of the organization, characteristics of the user (health professional), and characteristics of the innovation. When analysing the determinants, a distinction was made between systematically designed and non-systematically designed studies. In a systematic study, a determinant analysis was performed and the innovation strategy was adapted to these determinants. Furthermore, the determinants were associated with the degree of implementation, and both users and non-users of the innovation were asked about possible determinants. In the Delphi study, consensus was defined as agreement among 75% of the experts on both the influence of a determinant and the direction towards which that influence tended (i.e. facilitating, impeding, or neutral).
From the initial 2239 abstracts, 57 studies were retrieved and 49 determinants were identified that affected (impeded or facilitated) the innovation process. The experts identified one other determinant. Seventeen studies had a more-or-less systematic design; the others did not. After three rounds, consensus was reached on the influence of 49 out of 50 determinants.
The results of the literature review matched those found in the Delphi study, and 50 potentially relevant determinants of innovation processes were identified. Many of the innovation studies had several methodological flaws, such as not adjusting innovation strategies to relevant determinants of the innovation process, or that data on determinants were gathered only from non-users. Furthermore, the degree of implementation was evaluated in several ways, which made comparison difficult.

  • International Journal of Health Promotion and Education 05/2014; 52(6):315-327. DOI:10.1080/14635240.2014.912445
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inleiding: Het doel van dit onderzoek is het verbeteren van de praktijk van signalering van gezondheidsproblemen bij 5-6 en 10-11 jarige kinderen in de Jeugdgezondheidszorg (JGZ). Een standaard signaleringslijst is ontwikkeld en getoetst op de bruikbaarheid voor het Preventief Gezondheidsonderzoek (PGO), waarbij wel of geen triage wordt gebruikt. Methode: De standaard signaleringlijst werd op een systematische wijze ontwikkeld op basis van een beoordelingskader en met betrokkenheid van een expertgroep. Vervolgens is de ontwikkelde signaleringslijst op bruikbaarheid getoetst bij ouders en JGZ-medewerkers. De antwoorden van 793 ouders op de signaleringslijsten zijn kwantitatief geanalyseerd. Ook zijn er interviews gehouden met 50 ouders en negen JGZ-medewerkers over de bruikbaarheid van de lijst. Resultaten: Resultaten van het bruikbaarheidsonderzoek tonen aan dat het merendeel van de ouders van de 5-6 en 10-11 jarigen alle vragen invult, respectievelijk 68% en 71%. Ouders van allochtone herkomst vulden de signaleringlijst minder volledig in dan ouders van Nederlandse herkomst. Zowel ouders als JGZ-medewerkers beoordelen de bruikbaarheid van de standaard signaleringslijsten positief. Conclusie: Het onderzoek toont aan dat de standaard signaleringslijst goed bruikbaar is binnen de JGZ-praktijk. Aanbevolen wordt om aandacht te geven aan implementatie van de standaard signaleringslijst in de JGZ en verder onderzoek te doen naar normaalwaarden en validiteit. Abstract Identification of health problems in preventive child healthcare: development and usability of standardized questionnaires. Introduction: The main aim of the current project was to improve the task of Preventive Child Healthcare (PCH) in identifying health problems in children aged 5-6 and 10-11 years. This was achieved by developing a standardized questionnaire as part of the preventive health examinations and by investigating the usability of this questionnaire. Method: A systematic approach was used to develop a standardized questionnaire, e.g. the use of an assessment framework and an expert group. Next, the usability of the standardized questionnaire has been investigated among parents and PCH professionals; the answers of 793 parents on the questionnaire were analyzed. Furthermore 50 parents and 9 PCH professionals were interviewed about the usability of the questionnaires. Results: The usability study showed that the majority of the parents of children aged 5-6 and 10-11 years completed all questions in the questionnaire, respectively 68% and 71%. Especially the Dutch parents filled out the complete questionnaire (compared to immigrant parents). Most parents and PCH professionals rated the usability of the questionnaire as positive. Conclusion: The results of the usability study show that the standardized questionnaire can be used in current PCH practice. We recommend validation research in order to assess whether the questionnaire actually improves the identification of health problems by PCH.
    10/2013; 91(7):415-421. DOI:10.1007/s12508-013-0139-8
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The impact of physical inactivity and unhealthy diet on health is increasingly profound. Lifestyle interventions targeting both behaviors simultaneously might decrease the prevalence of overweight and comorbidities. The Dutch ‘BeweegKuur’ is a combined lifestyle intervention (CLI) in primary care, to improve physical activity and dietary behavior in overweight people. In a cluster randomized controlled trial, the (cost-) effectiveness of an intensively guided program has been compared to a less intensively guided program. This process evaluation aimed to assess protocol adherence and potential differences between clusters. In addition, sustainability (i.e. continuation of the CLI in practice after study termination) was evaluated. Methods Existing frameworks were combined to design the process evaluation for our intervention and setting specifically. We assessed reach, fidelity, dose delivered and received, context and implementation strategy. Both qualitative and quantitative data were used for a comprehensive evaluation. Data were collected in semi-structured interviews with health care providers (HCPs, n = 25), drop-out registration by HCPs, regular questionnaires among participants (n = 411) and logbooks kept by researchers during the trial. Results Protocol adherence by professionals and participants varied between the programs and clusters. In both programs the number of meetings with all HCPs was lower than planned in the protocol. Participants of the supervised program attended, compared to participants of the start-up program, more meetings with physiotherapists, but fewer with lifestyle advisors and dieticians. The ‘BeweegKuur’ was not sustained, but intervention aspects, networks and experiences were still utilized after finalization of the project. Whether clusters continued to offer a CLI seemed dependent on funding opportunities and collaborations. Conclusions Protocol adherence in a CLI was problematic in both HCPs and participants. Mainly the amount of dietary guidance was lower than planned, and decreased with increasing guidance by PT. Thus, feasibility of changing physical activity and dietary habits simultaneously by one intervention in one year was not as high as expected. Also the sustainability of CLI was poor. When a CLI program is started, re-invention should be allowed and maximum effort should be taken to guarantee long term continuation, by planning both implementation and sustainability carefully.
    BMC Family Practice 03/2015; 16(37). DOI:10.1186/s12875-015-0254-5 · 1.74 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 2, 2014