Article

Convenient determination of DNA extraction efficiency using an external DNA recovery standard and quantitative-competitive PCR.

Department of Microbiology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA.
Journal of Microbiological Methods (Impact Factor: 2.1). 05/2004; 57(2):259-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.01.013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Molecular biology techniques have advanced the field of microbial ecology through the analysis of nucleic acids. Most techniques that use DNA or RNA require their extraction from environmental matrices, which can be tedious and inefficient. While a number of extraction methods, both laboratory-based and commercially available, have been developed, none of these include a convenient method to determine extraction efficiency. We have developed an external DNA recovery standard, Lambda DNA (target DNA) contained within pBR322, allowing routine determinations of DNA recovery efficiency. Target DNA was added to sediments as whole cells, total DNA extracted using commercial DNA extraction/purification kits and the amount of target DNA recovered quantified by quantitative-competitive PCR (QC-PCR). Three commercially available kits (UltraClean Soil DNA, FastDNA SPIN and Soil Master DNA Extraction) were evaluated for recovery efficiency. Recoveries for the three kits ranged from undetectable to 43.3% with average recoveries of 14.9+/-16.0%, 28.3+/-10.5% and 2.4+/-0.1% (UltraClean, FastDNA and Soil Master, respectively). Quantification of target DNA proved robust in sediments heavily polluted with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and the external recovery standard could be detected following extraction and amplification from as few as 1 x 10(3) cells added to 0.5 g sediment (wet weight). The external DNA recovery standard was also added directly to the sediment as purified plasmid DNA prior to extraction. It was recovered with similar efficiency as when added as whole cells, suggesting its usefulness in estimating DNA recovery in ribosomal DNA studies. These results show that, while the commercial kits offer expedited sample processing, the extraction efficiencies vary on a sample-by-sample basis and were <100%. Therefore, quantitative DNA studies require an estimation of DNA recovery.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
150 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Molecular biological methods have become increasingly relevant to the diagnosis and control of infectious diseases, such as leishmaniasis. Since various factors may affect the sensitivity of PCR assays, including DNA yield and purity, an optimal extraction method is pivotal. Losses of a parasite's DNA during extraction may significantly impair its detection by PCR and lead to false-negative results. This study proposes a triplex PCR assay targeting the parasite's DNA, an external control (pUC18) and an internal control (G3PD) for accurate diagnosis of leishmaniasis. Two primer pairs were designed to detect the plasmid pUC18 and a triplex PCR assay targeting the Leishmania braziliensis kinetoplast DNA, the external control and the internal control was standardized. The triplex PCR assay was assessed for its ability to detect the three target DNA fragments simultaneously. PCR products from pUC18 DNA resulted in bands of 368 (P1) and 316 (P2) base pairs (bp). The triplex PCR optimized with the chosen external control system (P1) allowed the simultaneous detection of the internal control (G3PD - 567 bp) as well as of small quantities (10 pg) of the target parasite's DNA, detected by amplification of a 138 bp product. The new tool standardized herein enables a more reliable interpretation of PCR results, mainly by contributing to quality assurance of leishmaniasis diagnosis. Furthermore, after simple standardization steps, this protocol could be applied to the diagnosis of other infectious diseases in reference laboratories. This triplex PCR enables the assessment of small losses during the DNA extraction process, problems concerning DNA degradation (sample quality) and the detection of L. braziliensis kDNA.
    Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases 01/2014; 20:16. · 0.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Environmental DNA (eDNA) is hypothesized to accumulate in surface water and sediment; however, the distribution of eDNA within a lentic environment and its relationship to fish spatial distribution is not well-known. We developed a quantitative PCR assay for the cytochrome b gene of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio), an ubiquitous invasive fish, and used it to measure eDNA in a small (65 ha) lake, in which both the density of carp and their spatial distribution were monitored for several years. Surface water, sub-surface water, and sediment were sampled from 22 locations in the lake, including areas frequently used by the carp. The detectability and concentration of eDNA in surface and sub-surface water were not significantly different (p > 0.05). In water, areas of high carp use had higher detectability and eDNA concentration, but there was no effect of fish use on sediment. Detectability followed the trend: high use water > low use water > sediment. Concentration of eDNA was highest in sediment on a per mass basis. These results suggest that eDNA sampling schemes should be informed by expected fish distribution patterns. This research is funded by Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund.
    American Fisheries Society 144th Annual Meeting; 08/2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is no universally-accepted method to quantify bacteria and archaea in seawater and marine sediments, and different methods have produced conflicting results in the same samples. To identify best-practices, we compiled data from 65 studies, plus our own measurements, in which bacteria and archaea were quantified with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), catalyzed reporter deposition FISH (CARD-FISH), polyribonucleotide FISH, or quantitative PCR (qPCR). To estimate efficiency, we defined "yield" as the sum of bacteria and archaea counted by these techniques divided by total cells. In seawater, yield was high (median 71%) and was similar for FISH, CARD-FISH, and polyribonucleotide FISH. In sediments, only for CARD-FISH measurements in which archaeal cells were permeabilized with proteinase K had high yields (median 84%). Therefore the majority of cells in both environments appear to be alive, since they contain intact ribosomes. In sediments, the sum of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene qPCR counts was not closely related to cell counts, even after accounting for variations in copy numbers per genome. However, qPCR measurements were precise relative to other qPCR measurements made on the same samples. qPCR is therefore a reliable relative quantification method. Inconsistent results for the relative abundance of bacteria vs. archaea in deep subsurface sediments were resolved by the removal of CARD-FISH measurements in which lysozyme was used to permeabilize archaeal cells and qPCR measurements which used ARCH516 as an archaeal primer or TaqMan probe. Data from best-practice methods showed that archaea and bacteria decreased as depth increased in seawater and marine sediments, although archaea decreased more slowly.
    Applied and Environmental Microbiology 10/2013; · 3.95 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
200 Downloads
Available from
May 22, 2014