Convenient determination of DNA extraction efficiency using an external DNA recovery standard and quantitative-competitive PCR

Department of Microbiology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA.
Journal of Microbiological Methods (Impact Factor: 2.03). 05/2004; 57(2):259-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.01.013
Source: PubMed


Molecular biology techniques have advanced the field of microbial ecology through the analysis of nucleic acids. Most techniques that use DNA or RNA require their extraction from environmental matrices, which can be tedious and inefficient. While a number of extraction methods, both laboratory-based and commercially available, have been developed, none of these include a convenient method to determine extraction efficiency. We have developed an external DNA recovery standard, Lambda DNA (target DNA) contained within pBR322, allowing routine determinations of DNA recovery efficiency. Target DNA was added to sediments as whole cells, total DNA extracted using commercial DNA extraction/purification kits and the amount of target DNA recovered quantified by quantitative-competitive PCR (QC-PCR). Three commercially available kits (UltraClean Soil DNA, FastDNA SPIN and Soil Master DNA Extraction) were evaluated for recovery efficiency. Recoveries for the three kits ranged from undetectable to 43.3% with average recoveries of 14.9+/-16.0%, 28.3+/-10.5% and 2.4+/-0.1% (UltraClean, FastDNA and Soil Master, respectively). Quantification of target DNA proved robust in sediments heavily polluted with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and the external recovery standard could be detected following extraction and amplification from as few as 1 x 10(3) cells added to 0.5 g sediment (wet weight). The external DNA recovery standard was also added directly to the sediment as purified plasmid DNA prior to extraction. It was recovered with similar efficiency as when added as whole cells, suggesting its usefulness in estimating DNA recovery in ribosomal DNA studies. These results show that, while the commercial kits offer expedited sample processing, the extraction efficiencies vary on a sample-by-sample basis and were <100%. Therefore, quantitative DNA studies require an estimation of DNA recovery.

Download full-text


Available from: Robert H Findlay,
  • Source
    • "Other forms of post-mortem genetic damage, for example cross-linking (Poinar et al., 1998), and the complications of co-extracted chemical impurities routinely encountered in ancient and forensic DNA studies have yet to be addressed. While the realities of degradation make it highly unlikely that aDNA or forensic extraction copy numbers will ever reach " modern " levels, recognition that there is substantial preserved DNA in skeletal samples that is being lost during extraction is vital to improving methodologies for the extraction of DNA from finite resources such as ancient and forensic biological materials (Mumy and Findlay, 2004; Dabney et al., 2013). Successfully accessing and retaining even a fraction of these DNA molecules will expand the potential of degraded materials research. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: DNA from ancient sources is generally believed to be of low copy number, despite minimal attention towards direct measurement of DNA loss accumulated through the extraction process. We developed synthesized “standards” to measure the efficiency of some common DNA extraction methods for degraded skeletal samples, and used quantitative PCR to estimate a known quantity of DNA subjected to a given extraction method (i.e. “copies in”) versus quantity of DNA retained (i.e. “copies out”). All methods performed poorly in retaining short segments of DNA, giving low copy number results even when pre-extraction copy numbers far exceeded those expected of ancient samples. These findings challenge low copy number expectations, suggesting that ancient specimens may contain far more preserved genetic material than previously recognized. Furthermore, they emphasize the importance of optimizing and/or developing specialized extraction methods for retrieving degraded DNA.
    Journal of Archaeological Science 06/2014; 46. DOI:10.1016/j.jas.2014.03.030 · 2.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The extraction of nucleic acids from biological samples is a critical step and may result in losses of the target DNA [16]. Since various factors may affect the sensitivity of PCR assays, including DNA yield and purity, an optimal extraction method is essential. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Molecular biological methods have become increasingly relevant to the diagnosis and control of infectious diseases, such as leishmaniasis. Since various factors may affect the sensitivity of PCR assays, including DNA yield and purity, an optimal extraction method is pivotal. Losses of a parasite's DNA during extraction may significantly impair its detection by PCR and lead to false-negative results. This study proposes a triplex PCR assay targeting the parasite's DNA, an external control (pUC18) and an internal control (G3PD) for accurate diagnosis of leishmaniasis. Two primer pairs were designed to detect the plasmid pUC18 and a triplex PCR assay targeting the Leishmania braziliensis kinetoplast DNA, the external control and the internal control was standardized. The triplex PCR assay was assessed for its ability to detect the three target DNA fragments simultaneously. PCR products from pUC18 DNA resulted in bands of 368 (P1) and 316 (P2) base pairs (bp). The triplex PCR optimized with the chosen external control system (P1) allowed the simultaneous detection of the internal control (G3PD - 567 bp) as well as of small quantities (10 pg) of the target parasite's DNA, detected by amplification of a 138 bp product. The new tool standardized herein enables a more reliable interpretation of PCR results, mainly by contributing to quality assurance of leishmaniasis diagnosis. Furthermore, after simple standardization steps, this protocol could be applied to the diagnosis of other infectious diseases in reference laboratories. This triplex PCR enables the assessment of small losses during the DNA extraction process, problems concerning DNA degradation (sample quality) and the detection of L. braziliensis kDNA.
    Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases 04/2014; 20(1):16. DOI:10.1186/1678-9199-20-16 · 0.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "An environmental matrix can also significantly affect sample processing efficiency. DNA recovery and purification can be inefficient and variable from one sample to the next (Wilson, 1997; Mumy and Findaly, 2004; Stoeckel et al., 2009). In addition, reference samples were wellmixed in the SIPP study, and contained at most a mixture of two fecal sources. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Microbial source tracking (MST) methods were evaluated in the Source Identification Protocol Project (SIPP), in which 27 laboratories compared methods to identify host sources of fecal pollution from blinded water samples containing either one or two different fecal types collected from California. This paper details lessons learned from the SIPP study and makes recommendations to further advance the field of MST. Overall, results from the SIPP study demonstrated that methods are available that can correctly identify whether particular host sources including humans, cows and birds have contributed to contamination in a body of water. However, differences between laboratory protocols and data processing affected results and complicated interpretation of MST method performance in some cases. This was an issue particularly for samples that tested positive (non-zero Ct values) but below the limits of quantification or detection of a PCR assay. Although false positives were observed, such samples in the SIPP study often contained the fecal pollution source that was being targeted, i.e., the samples were true positives. Given these results, and the fact that MST often requires detection of targets present in low concentrations, we propose that such samples be reported and identified in a unique category to facilitate data analysis and method comparisons. Important data can be lost when such samples are simply reported as positive or negative. Actionable thresholds were not derived in the SIPP study due to limitations that included geographic scope, age of samples, and difficulties interpreting low concentrations of target in environmental samples. Nevertheless, the results of the study support the use of MST for water management, especially to prioritize impaired waters in need of remediation. Future integration of MST data into quantitative microbial risk assessments and other models could allow managers to more efficiently protect public health based on site conditions.
    Water Research 07/2013; 47(18). DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.063 · 5.53 Impact Factor
Show more