Traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy for significantly and chronically distressed married couples.

Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (Impact Factor: 4.85). 05/2004; 72(2):176-91. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.2.176
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A randomized clinical trial compared the effects of traditional behavioral couple therapy (TBCT) and integrative behavioral couple therapy (IBCT) on 134 seriously and chronically distressed married couples, stratified into moderately and severely distressed groups. Couples in IBCT made steady improvements in satisfaction throughout the course of treatment, whereas TBCT couples improved more quickly than IBCT couples early in treatment but then, in contrast to the IBCT group, plateaued later in treatment. Both treatments produced similar levels of clinically significant improvement by the end of treatment (71% of IBCT couples and 59% of TBCT couples were reliably improved or recovered on the Dyadic Adjustment Scale; G. B. Spanier, 1976). Measures of communication also showed improvement for both groups. Measures of individual functioning improved as marital satisfaction improved.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although applied behavior analysts often say they engage in evidence-based practice, they express differing views on what constitutes "evidence" and "practice." This article describes a practice as a service offered by a provider to help solve a problem presented by a consumer. Solving most problems (e.g., increasing or decreasing a behavior and maintaining this change) requires multiple intervention procedures (i.e., a package). Single-subject studies are invaluable in investigating individual procedures, but researchers still need to integrate the procedures into a package. The package must be standardized enough for independent providers to replicate yet flexible enough to allow individualization; intervention manuals are the primary technology for achieving this balance. To test whether the package is effective in solving consumers' problems, researchers must evaluate outcomes of the package as a whole, usually in group studies such as randomized controlled trials. From this perspective, establishing an evidence-based practice involves more than analyzing the effects of discrete intervention procedures on behavior; it requires synthesizing information so as to offer thorough solutions to problems. Recognizing the need for synthesis offers behavior analysts many promising opportunities to build on their existing research to increase the quality and quantity of evidence-based practices.
    The Behavior analyst / MABA 01/2013; 36(1):7-33. · 1.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We examine whether head motion can be used for predicting human expert's judgments of behavioral characteristics relevant to the couples therapy domain. Specifically we predict “high” or “low” presence of several behavioral characteristics such as “Blame” that are discerned by human experts, through data-driven clustering of the head motion signal based on power-spectral features. We employ the distribution of motion samples in each cluster for behavior judgment prediction. We find clustering horizontal and vertical motion separately is superior to combined clustering in predicting behavior. The performance of gender-specific and gender-independent clustering of head motion is comparable in average while different for each gender. The proposed power-spectral features outperform linear prediction features in average. Using data from a clinical study of distressed couples, we empirically show that the derived clusters quantize head motion into meaningful types that relate to interpretable behavior characteristics. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of inferring behavior characteristics from head motion signals.
    ICASSP 2014 - 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP); 05/2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examined differences in marital satisfaction between first and second marriages and how additional factors can help explain satisfaction differences between the marriage types. Participants in first marriages reported higher levels of satisfaction than remarried individuals. Regression analyses demonstrated marriage type to be a moderator of satisfaction in second marriages; as education increased, satisfaction also increased. Length of marriage was found to significantly influence satisfaction in first marriages, but not second marriages. In both first and second marriages, participants currently in counseling reported lower satisfaction scores. The need to understand remarriages' distinct characteristics apart from first marriages is discussed.
    Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 01/2013; 54(1):78-93. DOI:10.1080/10502556.2012.743831